IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v29y2025i2p574-589.html

Intentions of housing developers to reuse wood materials in buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Renée Sørum Gangsø
  • Gudbrand Lien
  • Mehmet Mehmetoglu
  • Hanne Kathrine Sjølie
  • Ståle Størdal

Abstract

The environmental impacts of the construction industry can be decreased by enhancing material circularity. This study explored the psychological factors that influence the intention of housing developers to use recycled wood materials in construction projects. A cross‐sectional survey (n = 138) was conducted in the fall of 2022 in southern Norway. A conceptual model was developed and tested to integrate the theory of planned behavior and institutional theory. The model incorporates three behavioral variables (behavioral attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control), regulatory and market factors, and previous reuse behavior to investigate their direct and indirect impacts on reuse intention. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses. In addition, a bootstrapping test was used to examine the potential mediating effects. The conceptual model explained a large proportion (R2$R^2$ = 53 %) of the intentions of housing developers to use recycled wood materials in construction projects in the next 5 years. The results reveal that previous reuse behavior, behavioral attitude, perceived behavioral control, and regulatory and market factors positively impact the intention to use recycled wood materials, while subjective norms do not have a significant effect. This suggests that changes in the use of recycled materials do not originate from consumer requirements. Easy access to materials, information, and suitable regulations and standards can improve the intention to use recycled wood in construction projects. Thus, this may be a first step toward establishing an industrialized value chain for recycled wood materials for construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Renée Sørum Gangsø & Gudbrand Lien & Mehmet Mehmetoglu & Hanne Kathrine Sjølie & Ståle Størdal, 2025. "Intentions of housing developers to reuse wood materials in buildings," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(2), pages 574-589, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:574-589
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13618
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peidong Sang & Haona Yao & Lin Zhang & Sen Wang & Yanjie Wang & Jinjian Liu, 2020. "Influencing factors of consumers’ willingness to purchase green housing: a survey from Shandong Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4267-4287, June.
    2. Gadenne, David & Sharma, Bishnu & Kerr, Don & Smith, Tim, 2011. "The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7684-7694.
    3. repec:eme:ijhma0:ijhma-11-2017-0097 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Daniel R. Cooper & Timothy G. Gutowski, 2017. "The Environmental Impacts of Reuse: A Review," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(1), pages 38-56, February.
    5. Wee-Lee Tan & Yen-Nee Goh, 2018. "The role of psychological factors in influencing consumer purchase intention towards green residential building," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(5), pages 788-807, October.
    6. Julian Kirchherr & Andrea Urbinati & Kris Hartley, 2023. "Circular economy: A new research field?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1239-1251, October.
    7. Jaap Sok & Joao Rossi Borges & Peter Schmidt & Icek Ajzen, 2021. "Farmer Behaviour as Reasoned Action: A Critical Review of Research with the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 388-412, June.
    8. Li, Qianwen & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2018. "Differences and influencing factors for Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housings: Evidence from five first-tier cities in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 299-313.
    9. Magnus Sparrevik & Luitzen Boer & Ottar Michelsen & Christofer Skaar & Haley Knudson & Annik Magerholm Fet, 2021. "Circular economy in the construction sector: advancing environmental performance through systemic and holistic thinking," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 392-400, September.
    10. Shijing Yang & Yikun Su & Wei Wang & Kaicheng Hua, 2019. "Research on Developers’ Green Procurement Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Charles Gillott & Will Mihkelson & Maud Lanau & Dave Cheshire & Danielle Densley Tingley, 2023. "Developing Regenerate: A circular economy engagement tool for the assessment of new and existing buildings," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 423-435, April.
    12. Pascual Berrone & Andrea Fosfuri & Liliana Gelabert & Luis R. Gomez‐Mejia, 2013. "Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 891-909, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Hao & Deng, Nana & Cheng, Kaiwei & Lu, Bin & Zhang, Bin & Wang, Bo, 2020. "How to effectively implement an incentive-based residential electricity demand response policy? Experience from large-scale trials and matching questionnaires," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Tong Hu & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Nurul Hassan Reza & Mengling Wu & Qing Yang, 2024. "Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Magdalena Grębosz-Krawczyk & Agnieszka Zakrzewska-Bielawska & Sylwia Flaszewska, 2021. "From Words to Deeds: The Impact of Pro-Environmental Self-Identity on Green Energy Purchase Intention," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Luca Ferri & Maria Iuorio & Marco Maffei & Fiorenza Meucci, 2026. "Environmental Awareness and Sustainable Public Procurement: An Analysis of Perceptions of Public Officials," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 1465-1478, January.
    5. Shiwen Zhao & Liwen Chen, 2021. "Exploring Residents’ Purchase Intention of Green Housings in China: An Extended Perspective of Perceived Value," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Xia Cao & Tianjiao Zhao & Zeyu Xing, 2022. "How Do Government Policies Promote Green Housing Diffusion in China? A Complex Network Game Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Morgane Innocent & Agnès François-Lecompte & Nolwenn Roudaut, 2020. "Comparison of human versus technological support to reduce domestic electricity consumption in France," Post-Print hal-02450849, HAL.
    8. Chun-Hsi Vivian Chen & Yu-Cheng Chen, 2021. "Assessment of Enhancing Employee Engagement in Energy-Saving Behavior at Workplace: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Zhenjiao Chen & Yaqing Liu, 2020. "The Effects of Leadership and Reward Policy on Employees’ Electricity Saving Behaviors: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. María Belén Prados-Peña & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Pedro Núñez-Cacho & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2024. "Intention to purchase sustainable craft products: a moderated mediation analysis of the adoption of sustainability in the craft sector," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 775-797, January.
    11. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Maciejowska & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Rafal Weron, 2014. "Diffusion and adoption of dynamic electricity tariffs: An agent-based modeling approach," HSC Research Reports HSC/14/01, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    12. Cristiano Codagnone & Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri & Francesco Bogliacino & Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva & George Gaskell & Andriy Ivchenko & Pietro Ortoleva & Francesco Mureddu, 2016. "Labels as nudges? An experimental study of car eco-labels," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(3), pages 403-432, December.
    13. Ohler, Adrienne M. & Billger, Sherrilyn M., 2014. "Does environmental concern change the tragedy of the commons? Factors affecting energy saving behaviors and electricity usage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Tamer Z. Fouad Mohamed, 2024. "Extending the theory of planned behavior with government support and perceived risk to test the adoption of light electric vehicles in Tainan," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(1), pages 24-41, January.
    15. Matthias Kalverkamp & Alexandra Pehlken & Thorsten Wuest, 2017. "Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Briguglio, Marie & Formosa, Glenn, 2017. "When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-162.
    17. Zhao, Feng & Wang, Jinhai & Chen, Qian, 2025. "Climate change exposure and corporate strategic aggressiveness: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 26-53.
    18. Fang, Xingming & Wang, Lu & Sun, Chuanwang & Zheng, Xuemei & Wei, Jing, 2021. "Gap between words and actions: Empirical study on consistency of residents supporting renewable energy development in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    19. Jung-Chieh Lee & Ting Li & Lihui Zhang, 2025. "Environmental concerns and green trust in continuous green fintech use: an expectation-confirmation model with insights from Ant Forest," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Belaïd, Fateh & Joumni, Haitham, 2020. "Behavioral attitudes towards energy saving: Empirical evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:29:y:2025:i:2:p:574-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.