IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v7y2016i2p207-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frustrated Leadership: Russia's Economic Alternative to the West

Author

Listed:
  • Juliet Johnson
  • Seçkin Köstem

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliet Johnson & Seçkin Köstem, 2016. "Frustrated Leadership: Russia's Economic Alternative to the West," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 207-216, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:207-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1758-5899.12301
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew F. Cooper & Asif B. Farooq, 2013. "BRICS and the Privileging of Informality in Global Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(4), pages 428-433, November.
    2. Vladimir Mau, 2016. "Between crises and sanctions: economic policy of the Russian Federation," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 350-377, July.
    3. Juliet Johnson & Andrew Barnes, 2015. "Financial nationalism and its international enablers: The Hungarian experience," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 535-569, June.
    4. Helleiner, Eric, 2014. "The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance After the 2008 Meltdown," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199973637.
    5. Asel Isakova & Zsoka Koczan & Alexander Plekhanov, 2016. "How much do tariffs matter? Evidence from the customs union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 166-184, April.
    6. Gregory T. Chin, 2014. "The BRICS-led Development Bank: Purpose and Politics beyond the G20," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5(3), pages 366-373, September.
    7. Stephen Wegren & Andrew Konitzer, 2007. "Prospects for Managed Democracy in Russia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 1025-1047.
    8. Neil Robinson, 2013. "Russia's Response to Crisis: The Paradox of Success," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(3), pages 450-472.
    9. Mikko Huotari & Thilo Hanemann, 2014. "Emerging Powers and Change in the Global Financial Order," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5(3), pages 298-310, September.
    10. Asel Isakova & Zsoka Koczan & Alexander Plekhanov, 2013. "How much do tariffs matter? Evidence from the customs union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia," Working Papers 154, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Office of the Chief Economist.
    11. Francisco G. Carneiro, 2013. "What Promises Does the Eurasian Customs Union Hold for the Future?," World Bank Publications - Reports 17034, The World Bank Group.
    12. Sam Pryke, 2012. "Economic Nationalism: Theory, History and Prospects," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 3(3), pages 281-291, September.
    13. Andrej Krickovic, 2014. "Imperial nostalgia or prudent geopolitics? Russia's efforts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space in geopolitical perspective," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 503-528, November.
    14. Andrea Goldstein, 2013. "The Political Economy of Global Business: the Case of the BRICs," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(2), pages 162-172, May.
    15. Carneiro, Fracisco, 2013. "What Promises Does the Eurasian Customs Union Hold for the Future?," World Bank - Economic Premise, The World Bank, issue 108, pages 1-5, February.
    16. David Cadier, 2014. "Eastern Partnership vs Eurasian Union? The EU–Russia Competition in the Shared Neighbourhood and the Ukraine Crisis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5, pages 76-85, October.
    17. Asel Isakova & Zsoka Koczan & Alexander Plekhanov, 2016. "How much do tariffs matter? Evidence from the customs union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 166-184, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arevik Mkrtchyan, 2015. "Determining the Common External Tariff in a Customs Union: Evidence from the Eurasian Customs Union," BEROC Working Paper Series 27, Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC).
    2. Amat Adarov, 2023. "Eurasian economic integration: impact evaluation using the gravity model and the synthetic control methods," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(2), pages 467-504, May.
    3. Mkrtchyan Arevik, 2013. "Trade impact of non-tariff trade costs. An Assessment of the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan," EERC Working Paper Series 13/14e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS.
    4. Aktoty Aitzhanova & Shigeo Katsu & Johannes F. Linn & Vladislav Yezhov (ed.), 2014. "Kazakhstan 2050: Toward a Modern Society for All," Books, Emerging Markets Forum, edition 1, number kazakh2050, May.
    5. Celbis, Mehmet Guney & Wong, Pui-hang & Guznajeva, Tatjana, 2018. "The Eurasian customs union and the economic geography of Belarus: A panel convergence approach," MERIT Working Papers 2018-029, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Gulzar Ali & Zhaohua Li, 2017. "An Empirical Investigation on the Role of exports, imports and its Determinants in Foreign Trade of Pakistan," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 8(6), pages 39-58.
    7. Chiara Natalie Focacci & Mitja Kovac & Rok Spruk, 2022. "The perils of Kremlin's influence: evidence from Ukraine," Papers 2206.04950, arXiv.org.
    8. Augusto Cerqua & Pierluigi Montalbano & Zhansaya Temerbulatova, 2021. "A decade of Eurasian Integration: An ex-post non-parametric assessment of the Eurasian Economic Union," Working Papers 1/21, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    9. Ilene Grabel, 2019. "Continuity, Discontinuity and Incoherence in the Bretton Woods Order: A Hirschmanian Reading," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(1), pages 46-71, January.
    10. Gnutzmann, Hinnerk & Gnutzmann-Mkrtchyan, Arevik, 2020. "The Cost of Borders: Evidence from the Eurasian Customs Union," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-664, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    11. Sharafutdinova,Gulnaz & Lokshin,Michael M., 2020. "Hide and Protect : A Role of Global Financial Secrecy in Shaping Domestic Institutions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9348, The World Bank.
    12. Niemi, Riku, 2016. "The Eurasian Union: Much potential, little results," BOFIT Policy Briefs 1/2016, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    13. Andrew F. Cooper & Asif B. Farooq, 2015. "The Advocacy of Democratic Governance by India and China: Patterns of Consistency/Inconsistency between Declaratory and Operational Practices," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 71(3), pages 221-238, September.
    14. Anders Aslund, 2013. "Ukraine's Choice: European Association Agreement or Eurasian Union?," Policy Briefs PB13-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    15. Georgiev, Yordan & Nagy-Mohacsi, Piroska & Plekhanov, Alexander, 2017. "Structural Reform and Productivity Growth in Emerging Europe and Central Asia," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 523, Asian Development Bank.
    16. Miroslawa Laszuk, 2014. "Changes in the regulations of commodity turnover with third countries following establishment of the customs union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 13(1), pages 147-162, March.
    17. Victor Manuel Isidro Luna, 2019. "Development banking, state of confidence and sustainable growth," Working Papers PKWP1917, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    18. Mikko Huotari & Sandra Heep, 2016. "Learning geoeconomics: China’s experimental financial and monetary initiatives," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 153-171, June.
    19. Popescu Raluca Maria, 2021. "European Union vs. Eurasian Union – a brief comparative analysis and perspectives for cooperation," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1294-1304, December.
    20. Andrew F. Cooper, 2017. "The BRICS’ New Development Bank: Shifting from Material Leverage to Innovative Capacity," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 275-284, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:7:y:2016:i:2:p:207-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.