IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v5y2014i3p366-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The BRICS-led Development Bank: Purpose and Politics beyond the G20

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory T. Chin

Abstract

type="graphical" xml:id="gpol12167-abs-0002"> The most fundamental challenge in launching the bank likely resides in the fact that, if the BRICS follow an approach similar to the World Bank's, the new BRICS bank will need to borrow from global capital markets by issuing bonds.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory T. Chin, 2014. "The BRICS-led Development Bank: Purpose and Politics beyond the G20," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5(3), pages 366-373, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:366-373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/gpol.2014.5.issue-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julie Gilson, 2020. "EU-ASEAN relations in the 2020s: pragmatic inter-regionalism?," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 727-745, July.
    2. Светличный А. И., 2018. "Устойчивое Развитие И Новый Банк Развития Брикс: Анализ И Перспективы," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 1, pages 68-88.
    3. Eugénia C. Heldt & Laura C. Mahrenbach, 2019. "Rising Powers in Global Economic Governance: Mapping the Flexibility‐Empowerment Nexus," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(1), pages 19-28, February.
    4. Gregory T. Chin & Kevin P. Gallagher, 2019. "Coordinated Credit Spaces: The Globalization of Chinese Development Finance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(1), pages 245-274, January.
    5. Alexandr Svetlicinii, 2018. "Sustainable Development and New Development Bank BRICS: Analysis and Perspectives," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 68-88.
    6. Gu, Jing & Renwick, Neil & Xue, Lan, 2018. "The BRICS and Africa's search for green growth, clean energy and sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 675-683.
    7. Andreas Kruck & Bernhard Zangl, 2020. "The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 5-16, October.
    8. Victor Manuel Isidro Luna, 2019. "Development banking, state of confidence and sustainable growth," Working Papers PKWP1917, Post Keynesian Economics Society (PKES).
    9. Juliet Johnson & Seçkin Köstem, 2016. "Frustrated Leadership: Russia's Economic Alternative to the West," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 207-216, May.
    10. Andrew F. Cooper & Asif B. Farooq, 2015. "The Advocacy of Democratic Governance by India and China: Patterns of Consistency/Inconsistency between Declaratory and Operational Practices," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 71(3), pages 221-238, September.
    11. Abhinandan Kumar, 2023. "Walking a Tightrope: Assessing India’s Engagements with G20 and BRICS," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 79(4), pages 525-534, December.
    12. Hang Luo & Lize Yang, 2021. "Equality and Equity in Emerging Multilateral Financial Institutions: The Case of the BRICS Institutions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 482-508, September.
    13. Muhammad Atif & Muqarrab Akbar, 2019. "BRICS and African Region Partnership: Challenges and Opportunities," Global Political Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(4), pages 59-69, December.
    14. Andrew F. Cooper, 2017. "The BRICS’ New Development Bank: Shifting from Material Leverage to Innovative Capacity," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 275-284, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:366-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.