IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v31y2024i5p2158-2179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feminist academic organizations: Challenging sexism through collective mobilizing across research, support, and advocacy

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren Gurrieri
  • Andrea Prothero
  • Shona Bettany
  • Susan Dobscha
  • Jenna Drenten
  • Shelagh Ferguson
  • Stacey Finkelstein
  • Laura McVey
  • Nacima Ourahmoune
  • Laurel Steinfield
  • Linda Tuncay Zayer

Abstract

This paper examines the establishment of a feminist academic organization, GENMAC (Gender, Markets, and Consumers; genmac.co), serving gender scholars in business schools and related fields. In so doing, it builds on the emerging literature of feminist academic organizations, as situated within feminist organizational studies (FOS). Through a feminist case study and by assessing the reflections of GENMAC's board members, we tell the story of the emergence of GENMAC and detail the tensions the organization encountered as it formally established itself as a feminist organization within the confines of a business school setting, a patriarchal system, and a neoliberal university paradigm. We build on the FOS literature by considering how our organization counters cultures of heightened individualism and builds collective action to challenge sexism through the nexus of research, support, and advocacy pillars of our organization. We demonstrate how, through these actions, our organization challenges hierarchies of knowledge, prioritizes the care and support needed for the day‐to‐day survival of gender scholars in business schools, and spotlights and challenges structural inequalities and injustices in the academy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren Gurrieri & Andrea Prothero & Shona Bettany & Susan Dobscha & Jenna Drenten & Shelagh Ferguson & Stacey Finkelstein & Laura McVey & Nacima Ourahmoune & Laurel Steinfield & Linda Tuncay Zayer, 2024. "Feminist academic organizations: Challenging sexism through collective mobilizing across research, support, and advocacy," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2158-2179, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:2158-2179
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12912
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kate Grosser & Jeremy Moon, 2019. "CSR and Feminist Organization Studies: Towards an Integrated Theorization for the Analysis of Gender Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 321-342, March.
    2. Debra A. Barbezat, 2006. "Gender Differences in Research Patterns Among PhD Economists," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 359-375, July.
    3. Steinfield, Laurel & Sanghvi, Minita & Zayer, Linda Tuncay & Coleman, Catherine A. & Ourahmoune, Nacima & Harrison, Robert L. & Hein, Wendy & Brace-Govan, Jan, 2019. "Transformative intersectionality: Moving business towards a critical praxis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 366-375.
    4. Catherine Coleman & Eileen Fischer & Linda Tuncay Zayer, 2021. "A Research Agenda for (Gender) Troubled Times: Striving for a Better Tomorrow," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(2), pages 205-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srinivas Venugopal, 2021. "Envisioning a community‐centric approach to impact assessments in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 118-133, March.
    2. Wai Ching Poon & Gareth D. Leeves, 2017. "Is there gender gap unequivocally? Evidence from research output 1958–2008," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1687-1701, June.
    3. Heidi Reed, 2024. "“When money is more valuable than people…”: The pandemic as a call for business to care," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 435-455, March.
    4. Melanie Richards, 2023. "When do Non-financial Goals Benefit Stakeholders? Theorizing on Care and Power in Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 333-351, May.
    5. Layla Branicki & Senia Kalfa & Alison Pullen & Stephen Brammer, 2023. "Corporate Responses to Intimate Partner Violence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 657-677, November.
    6. Cate Thomas & Colleen MacMillan & Merryn McKinnon & Hayley Torabi & Megan Osmond-McLeod & Ellen Swavley & Tamzen Armer & Kimberley Doyle, 2021. "Seeing and Overcoming the Complexities of Intersectionality," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, February.
    7. John P. Conley & Ali Sina Önder & Benno Torgler, 2016. "Are all economics graduate cohorts created equal? Gender, job openings, and research productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 937-958, August.
    8. Verónica Amarante & Marisa Bucheli & María Inés Moraes & Tatiana Pérez, 2021. "Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 40(84), pages 763-790, October.
    9. Tehmina Khan & Pavithra Siriwardhane, 2021. "Barriers to Career Progression in the Higher Education Sector: Perceptions of Australian Academics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Shuna Shu Ham Ho & Chang Hoon Oh & Daniel Shapiro, 2024. "Can Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Social License? A Sentiment and Emotion Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 445-476, March.
    11. Heidi Reed, 2023. "“When money is more valuable than people…”: The pandemic as a call for business to care," Post-Print hal-04461114, HAL.
    12. Pinkovetskaia Yu. S., 2021. "Comparative analysis of respondent's opinions concerning possibilities of successful startups and easy start of entrepreneurial activity," Russian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Omsk Humanitarian Academy, vol. 15(2), pages 219-226, June.
    13. Laura C. Blanco, 2022. "Diferenciales salariales de género y sus determinantes para el personal académico en propiedad en la Universidad de Costa Rica. (Gender wage differentials and its determinants for tenured academics at," Working Papers 202204, Universidad de Costa Rica, revised May 2022.
    14. Silvia Gherardi & Oliver Laasch, 2022. "Responsible Management-as-Practice: Mobilizing a Posthumanist Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 269-281, November.
    15. Araújo, Tanya & Fontainha, Elsa, 2017. "The specific shapes of gender imbalance in scientific authorships: A network approach," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 88-102.
    16. Vanita Yadav & Jeemol Unni & Ravikiran Naik & Swati Dutta, 2022. "Gender Differentials in Entrepreneurship: Insights from a Multi-method Study," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 30-64, March.
    17. María Fernández-Muiños & Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Luis Vázquez-Suárez, 2022. "Are the Sins of the Father the Sins of the Sons, but Not the Daughters? Exploring How Leadership Gender and Generation Impact the Corporate Social Responsibility of Franchise Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Cunningham, Rosemary & Zavodny, Madeline, 2012. "How Well Are Women Represented at the AEA Meeting? A Study of the 1985-2010 Programs," IZA Discussion Papers 6597, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Zachary Ferrara & Carlos J. Asarta, 2023. "The Lived Experiences of Top Women Contributors to Leading Economic Education Journals," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 68(1), pages 110-125, March.
    20. John P. Conley & Ali Sina Önder & Benno Torgler, 2012. "Are all High-Skilled Cohorts Created Equal? Unemployment, Gender, and Research Productivity," Working Papers 2012.86, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:2158-2179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.