IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v38y2026i2p420-437.html

How the Quota of Judges Reform Enhances Corporate Information Transparency: Evidence From China's Listed Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenkun Su
  • Jingbo Ning

Abstract

Exploiting the quasi‐natural experiment of China's Quota of Judges Reform, we find that enhanced judicial quality and independence significantly improve corporate information transparency. Using panel data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A‐share listed companies from 2011 to 2022 and employing a multi‐period difference‐in‐differences approach, we document that the quota of judges reform increases corporate transparency by approximately 2.05 percentage points. This conclusion remains robust after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. The improvement is driven by three key mechanisms: enriching judicial knowledge quantity, improving judicial knowledge quality, and enhancing judicial knowledge authority, all of which strengthen the credibility and enforceability of information disclosure regulations. The impact is more pronounced for firms that are non‐state‐owned, have low litigation risk, face high financing constraints, and exhibit high ownership concentration. This research enriches the discourse on judicial institutions and corporate behavior by demonstrating the pathways through which legal reforms enhance information transparency and market quality in emerging economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenkun Su & Jingbo Ning, 2026. "How the Quota of Judges Reform Enhances Corporate Information Transparency: Evidence From China's Listed Firms," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 420-437, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:420-437
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.70030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70030
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.70030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Ronald C. & Mansi, Sattar A. & Reeb, David M., 2004. "Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 315-342, September.
    2. Matthieu Chemin, 2020. "Judicial Efficiency and Firm Productivity: Evidence from a World Database of Judicial Reforms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(1), pages 49-64, March.
    3. La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert, 2000. "Investor protection and corporate governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 3-27.
    4. Jacopo Ponticelli & Leonardo S. Alencar, 2016. "Court Enforcement, Bank Loans, and Firm Investment: Evidence from a Bankruptcy Reform in Brazil," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(3), pages 1365-1413.
    5. Kshitiz Shrestha & Jorge Martinez‐Vazquez & Charles Hankla, 2023. "Political decentralization and corruption: Exploring the conditional role of parties," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 411-439, March.
    6. Feld, Lars P. & Voigt, Stefan, 2003. "Economic growth and judicial independence: cross-country evidence using a new set of indicators," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 497-527, September.
    7. Ball, Ray & Robin, Ashok & Wu, Joanna Shuang, 2003. "Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 235-270, December.
    8. Core, John E., 2001. "A review of the empirical disclosure literature: discussion," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 441-456, September.
    9. Piao Li & Chang Song & Jenny Jing Wang & Hongrui Zheng, 2022. "CFOs’ audit experience and corporate disclosure quality: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 4013-4039, September.
    10. Leuz, Christian & Nanda, Dhananjay & Wysocki, Peter D., 2003. "Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 505-527, September.
    11. Karthik Balakrishnan & Mary Brooke Billings & Bryan Kelly & Alexander Ljungqvist, 2014. "Shaping Liquidity: On the Causal Effects of Voluntary Disclosure," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2237-2278, October.
    12. Radhakrishnan Gopalan & Abhiroop Mukherjee & Manpreet Singh, 2016. "Do Debt Contract Enforcement Costs Affect Financing and Asset Structure?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(10), pages 2774-2813.
    13. Bradley, Michael & Chen, Dong, 2011. "Corporate governance and the cost of debt: Evidence from director limited liability and indemnification provisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 83-107, February.
    14. James R. Brown & J. Anthony Cookson & Rawley Z. Heimer, 2017. "Law and Finance Matter: Lessons from Externally Imposed Courts," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(3), pages 1019-1051.
    15. Charles J. Hadlock & Joshua R. Pierce, 2010. "New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1909-1940.
    16. Michaël Aklin & Eric Arias & Julia Gray, 2022. "Inflation concerns and mass preferences over exchange‐rate policy," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 5-40, March.
    17. Jun Qian & Philip E. Strahan, 2007. "How Laws and Institutions Shape Financial Contracts: The Case of Bank Loans," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(6), pages 2803-2834, December.
    18. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiwu Chen & Yan Chen & Yan Han & Meiting Lu & Yaowen Shan, 2026. "Justice’s financial footprint: Judicial independence and the cost of debt," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 51(1), pages 174-210, February.
    2. Christian Leuz & Peter D. Wysocki, 2016. "The Economics of Disclosure and Financial Reporting Regulation: Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 54(2), pages 525-622, May.
    3. Dai, Xiang & Lv, Jin Roc & Yang, Chen, 2026. "Bankruptcy courts and capital structures," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 57-72.
    4. Basu, Debarati & Sen, Kaustav, 2022. "Organizational form and access to capital: The role of regulatory interventions," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    5. Iatridis, George, 2010. "International Financial Reporting Standards and the quality of financial statement information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 193-204, June.
    6. Tsalavoutas, Ioannis & Tsoligkas, Fanis & Evans, Lisa, 2020. "Compliance with IFRS mandatory disclosure requirements: A structured literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    7. Majeed, Muhammad Ansar & Yan, Chao, 2021. "Financial statement comparability, state ownership, and the cost of debt: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Hong Huang & Xiangting Kong & Albert Tsang, 2019. "Professional Accountancy Organizations and Stock Market Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 231-260, June.
    9. Greta Falavigna & Roberto Ippoliti, 2022. "Financial constraints, investments, and environmental strategies: An empirical analysis of judicial barriers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2002-2018, July.
    10. Srinidhi, Bin & Lim, Chee Yeow & Hossain, Mahmud, 2009. "Effects of country-level legal, extra-legal and political institutions on auditing: A cross-country analysis of the auditor specialization premium," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 34-46.
    11. Si, Haiping & Li, Chengyu & Miao, Miao & Li, Xueyao & Wang, Chao, 2025. "Every coin has two sides: Does bankruptcy judicial reform promote corporate innovation༟," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1699-1720.
    12. Chauhan, Yogesh & Kumar, Surya Bhushan, 2019. "The value relevance of nonfinancial disclosure: Evidence from foreign equity investment," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 52.
    13. Gao, Hao & He, Jing & Li, Yong & Qu, Yuanyu, 2020. "Family control and cost of debt: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    14. Carol Ann Frost & Elizabeth A. Gordon & Andrew F. Hayes, 2006. "Stock Exchange Disclosure and Market Development: An Analysis of 50 International Exchanges," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 437-483, June.
    15. Singgih Wijayana & Sidney J. Gray, 2019. "Institutional Factors and Earnings Management in the Asia-Pacific: Is IFRS Adoption Making a Difference?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 307-334, April.
    16. David Schoenherr & Jan Starmans, 2022. "When Should Bankruptcy Law Be Creditor‐ or Debtor‐Friendly? Theory and Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(5), pages 2669-2717, October.
    17. Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C., 2017. "Accounting Quality and Loan Pricing: The Effect of Cross-country Differences in Legal Enforcement," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 178-200.
    18. Pedro J. García-Teruel & Pedro Martínez-Solano & Juan P. Sánchez-Ballesta, 2014. "Supplier Financing and Earnings Quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9-10), pages 1193-1211, November.
    19. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto, 2023. "SMEs’ behavior under financial constraints: An empirical investigation on the legal environment and the substitution effect with tax arrears," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Hussein Mohsen Saber Ahmed & Awad Elsayed Awad Ibrahim & Khaldoon Albitar, 2026. "Digital Technologies Disclosure and the Cost of Capital: The Mediating Role of Sustainability Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 5895-5925, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:420-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.