IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v44y2026i3ne70074.html

Impacts of trade and technology tensions: Evidence from Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Juthathip Jongwanich

Abstract

Motivation The trade and technology war between the United States and China poses significant challenges for small, open Asian economies like Thailand. Some argue that the policies driving this conflict present opportunities, including trade diversion and increased investment, particularly in the electronics sector—the centre of efforts to unwind economic interdependence. However, trade circumvention and domestic supply chain disruptions have emerged as threats that could outweigh the benefits. Determining whether threats outweigh the advantages requires systematic analysis. Purpose This study analyses the impacts of trade and technology war on Thailand, with a focus on three key areas: trade diversion; imports and supply chains; and trade circumvention, particularly within the electronics production chains. Approach and Methods This study uses detailed trade data at the six‐digit Harmonized System (HS) code level, investment information, and online business surveys from 2017–2024. To clearly assess the impact of the trade and technology war on Thailand, particularly in the electronics sector, the supply chain of electronic products in the country is identified and categorized into upstream, midstream, and downstream segments. The study explores input–output mapping for selected products to understand import structures and supply chain linkages. The Herfindahl–Hirschman index and intra‐industry trade index are also applied in the study. Findings The findings provide evidence of export diversion toward the US market, particularly in the downstream and midstream segments of the electronic supply chain. In the downstream segment, the shift was largely limited to market switching, while market expansion beyond the United States was observed in the midstream and upstream segments. The structure of Thailand's import partners has changed significantly, with China and Taiwan dominating the supply chain. The former dominates finished products, while the latter plays a leading role in parts and components. Stronger foreign investment and production capacity are observed in the midstream and upstream industries, while trade and free trade area utilization data suggest some trade circumvention, though the extent remains limited. Policy Implications The trade and technology war has reignited the need for Thailand to re‐evaluate a wide range of strategic issues. A well‐defined industrial policy, underpinned by coherent and coordinated strategies across government agencies, should be a top priority. Strengthening global and domestic supply chains, along with the restructuring of tariff and non‐tariff measures, should be another key area in reforming the country's policy. Regional cooperation, particularly within ASEAN/ASEAN+, is likely to become more significant than bilateral liberalization, especially amid the growing uncertainty of global trade policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Juthathip Jongwanich, 2026. "Impacts of trade and technology tensions: Evidence from Thailand," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 44(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:3:n:e70074
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Hong & Ning, Jingxin & Xu, Mingzhi (Jimmy), 2021. "An eye for an eye? The trade and price effects of China's retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Athukorala, Prema-chandra & Yamashita, Nobuaki, 2006. "Production fragmentation and trade integration: East Asia in a global context," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 233-256, December.
    3. Kei-Mu Yi, 2003. "Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(1), pages 52-102, February.
    4. Richard E. Baldwin, 2008. "Managing The Noodle Bowl: The Fragility Of East Asian Regionalism," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 53(03), pages 449-478.
    5. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Ju Hyun Pyun & Nobuaki Yamashita & Chih‐hai Yang, 2024. "Ripple effects in regional value chains: Evidence from an episode of the US–China trade war," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 880-897, March.
    6. Juthathip Jongwanich, 2025. "Free trade agreements (FTAs) and export structures: evidence from Thailand," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 483-521, April.
    7. Gopinath, Gita & Gourinchas, Pierre-Olivier & Presbitero, Andrea F. & Topalova, Petia, 2025. "Changing global linkages: A new Cold War?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Hiroshi Mukunoki, 2023. "The magnification effect in global value chains," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 141-157, February.
    2. Robert Koopman & William Powers & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2010. "Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains," NBER Working Papers 16426, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Witada Anukoonwattaka & Mia Mikic (ed.), 2011. "India: A New Player in Asian Production Networks?, Studies in Trade and Investment 75," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number tipub2624, January-j.
    4. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Souknilanh Keola & Sasatra Sudsawasd, 2026. "The Effects of US Additional Tariffs in Trump 2.0 on Production and Trade: Evidence From Thailand," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 64(2), pages 157-170, June.
    5. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2011. "China’s Trade in Asia and the World: Long run Relation with Short run Dynamics," MPRA Paper 30664, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 May 2011.
    6. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Ju Hyun Pyun & Nobuaki Yamashita & Chih‐hai Yang, 2024. "Ripple effects in regional value chains: Evidence from an episode of the US–China trade war," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 880-897, March.
    7. Haddad, Mona, 2007. "Trade integration in East Asia : the Role of China and production networks," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4160, The World Bank.
    8. Kazunobu Hayakawa, 2026. "Trade Effects of US Tariffs Under Trump 2.0," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 64(2), pages 121-142, June.
    9. Çakır, Mustafa Yavuz & Kabundi, Alain, 2013. "Trade shocks from BRIC to South Africa: A global VAR analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 190-202.
    10. Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso & Martina Vidovic & Anca M. Voicu, 2014. "EU-Accession Effects on Sectoral Trade: A Helpman-Melitz-Rubinstein Approach with Panel Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 4903, CESifo.
    11. Mitsuyo ANDO & Kazunobu HAYAKAWA & Fukunari KIMURA & Kenta YAMANOUCHI, 2025. "The Structure of Supply Chains and the Impacts of Trump 1.0 Tariffs: Evidence from Japanese firms’ sales to North America," Discussion papers 25046, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    12. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Chih‐Hai Yang, 2026. "Technology Sanctions and Firm R&D: Evidence From the U.S.–China Trade Dispute," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 406-419, July.
    13. Richard Baldwin & Javier Lopez-Gonzalez, 2015. "Supply-chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1682-1721, November.
    14. Miguel Angel Esquivias Padilla, & Dyah Wulan Sari, & Rossanto Dwi Handoyo, 2017. "Formation of production networks in ASEAN: Measuring the real value-added and identifying the role of ASEAN countries in the world supply chains," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(2), pages 237-255, May.
    15. Richard Baldwin, 2010. "Unilateral Tariff Liberalisation," NBER Working Papers 16600, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Okubo, Toshihiro & Watabe, Yuta, 2023. "Networked FDI and third-country intra-firm trade," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 591-606.
    17. Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Voicu, Anca M. & Vidovic, Martina, 2011. "CEECs Integration into Regional Production Networks. Trade Effects of EU-Accession," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 55, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    18. repec:got:cegedp:125 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Chin Hee Hahn & Yong-Seok Choi, 2010. "China’s Rise and Production and Investment Growth in Korean Manufacturing Industries: Channels and the Effects," Chapters, in: Takatoshi Ito & Chin Hee Hahn (ed.), The Rise of China and Structural Changes in Korea and Asia, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Tri WIDODO & Diyah PUTRIANI, 2011. "RMB Devaluation and Asean5 Countries’ Exports to the US: Complementary or Substitute?," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 8, pages 169-184, December.
    21. Liemt, Gijsbert van., 2007. "Subcontracting in electronics : from contract manufacturers to providers of electronic manufacturing services (EMS)," ILO Working Papers 993979313402676, International Labour Organization.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:3:n:e70074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.