IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v43y2012i3p649-670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

If You Don't Count, You Don't Count: Monitoring and Evaluation in South African NGOs

Author

Listed:
  • Natascha Mueller-Hirth

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Natascha Mueller-Hirth, 2012. "If You Don't Count, You Don't Count: Monitoring and Evaluation in South African NGOs," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(3), pages 649-670, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:43:y:2012:i:3:p:649-670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01776.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Jacobs & Chris Barnett & Richard Ponsford, 2010. "Three Approaches to Monitoring: Feedback Systems, Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation and Logical Frameworks," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(6), pages 36-44, November.
    2. Roberts, Susan M. & Jones III, John Paul & Frohling, Oliver, 2005. "NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1845-1864, November.
    3. Robert Chambers, 2010. "A Revolution Whose Time Has Come? The Win‐Win of Quantitative Participatory Approaches and Methods," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(6), pages 45-55, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adela Itzkin & Jai Kumar Clifford-Holmes & Mary Scholes & Kaera Coetzer, 2022. "Approaches to Enhance Integration and Monitoring for Social-Ecological Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Esther Turnhout & Katja Neves & Elisa de Lijster, 2014. "‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 581-597, March.
    3. Molecke, Greg & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2017. "Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 550-568.
    4. Boomsma, Roel & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2019. "Constituting the governable NGO: The correlation between conduct and counter-conduct in the evolution of funder-NGO accountability relations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-20.
    5. Tiina Kontinen & Anja Onali, 2017. "Strengthening Institutional Isomorphism in Development NGOs? Program Mechanisms in an Organizational Intervention," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6645 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Stéphan Pezé, 2011. "Thinking the unthinkable: managerialization of work related suicides as a framing process," Post-Print hal-00608894, HAL.
    3. Godofredo Ramizo Jr, 2016. "From Schism to Synthesis: The Off-Centre Radical-Reformist Role of Development Management," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(6), pages 789-807, November.
    4. Le Fanu, Guy, 2014. "International development, disability, and education: Towards a capabilities-focused discourse and praxis," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 69-79.
    5. Johanne Boucher & Joanne M. Roch, 2017. "Absorptive Capacity: North–South Partnerships and Organizational Learning Within Development Networks," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(2), pages 404-422, April.
    6. Katsutoshi Fushimi, 2024. "Institutional Environment Pressures Perceived by Bilateral Development Cooperation Agency's Constituents," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 217-235, March.
    7. Ferguson, J.E. & Huysman, M.H., 2009. "Between ambition and approach: towards sustainable knowledge management in development organizations," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Aogán Delaney & Tom Evans & John McGreevy & Jordan Blekking & Tyler Schlachter & Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki & Peter A. Tamás & Todd A. Crane & Hallie Eakin & Wiebke Förch & Lindsey Jones & Donald R. Nelson , 2018. "Governance of food systems across scales in times of social-ecological change: a review of indicators," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 287-310, April.
    9. Sébastien Boillat & Jean-David Gerber & Christoph Oberlack & Julie G. Zaehringer & Chinwe Ifejika Speranza & Stephan Rist, 2018. "Distant Interactions, Power, and Environmental Justice in Protected Area Governance: A Telecoupling Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, October.
    10. Jean-Baptiste Litrico & Marya L. Besharov, 2019. "Unpacking Variation in Hybrid Organizational Forms: Changing Models of Social Enterprise Among Nonprofits, 2000–2013," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 343-360, October.
    11. Lena Gutheil & Dirk‐Jan Koch, 2023. "Civil society organizations and managerialism: On the depoliticization of the adaptive management agenda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    12. Krystin Zigan & Alan Le Grys, 2018. "Towards an Understanding of Social Responsibility Within the Church of England," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 535-560, May.
    13. Juanjo Balaguer, 2024. "Participatory Video and Impact: Analysis of the Living Cultures Indigenous Fellowship," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(2), pages 496-514, April.
    14. Katsutoshi Fushimi, 2022. "Perceived Home and Host Country Institutional Environment Pressures by Bilateral Development Cooperation Agency's Constituents," Working Papers 228, JICA Research Institute.
    15. Tad Mutersbaugh & Lauren Martin, 2012. "Dialectics of Disassembly: Heifer-Care Protocols and the Alienation of Value in a Village Dairy Cooperative," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(3), pages 723-740, March.
    16. Boadu, Evans Sakyi & Ile, Isioma, 2019. "Between power and perception: Understanding youth perspectives in participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) in Ghana," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Emmanuel Kumi & Tara Saharan, 2022. "Hybridisation of institutional logics and civil society organisations' advocacy in Kenya," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(4), pages 245-255, October.
    18. Hall, Matthew, 2014. "Evaluation logics in the third sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 46365, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Ferguson, Julie & Huysman, Marleen & Soekijad, Maura, 2010. "Knowledge Management in Practice: Pitfalls and Potentials for Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1797-1810, December.
    20. Richard Axelby & Bethel Worku‐Dix & Emma Crewe, 2022. "Global partnerships on paper and in practice: Critical observations from inside a Global Challenge Research Fund capacity‐development project," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(8), pages 1496-1508, November.
    21. Cazenave, Bruno & Morales, Jeremy, 2024. "Against new humanitarian management: Prefigurative accounting in the humanitarian field," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:43:y:2012:i:3:p:649-670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.