IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v56y2020i2p165-212.html

Formal Analysis of Segregation of Duties (SoD) in Accounting: A Computational Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary Kim
  • Jagdish Gangolly
  • S. S. Ravi
  • Daniel J. Rosenkrantz

Abstract

This study examines a computational framework for segregation of duties (SoD) in the design as well as implementation of accounting systems. The framework consists of a model of workflows in accounting systems based on workflow graphs, a partial order model of roles performed by the actors in the accounting system, and a specification of SoD rules. We develop a set of algorithms for four SoD rules that can be used in the enforcement of SoD. For the SoD rule that precludes task type conflicts, our results show that while compliance verification can be carried out efficiently, finding an SoD compliant assignment of tasks is computationally intractable. For those situations, we present an integer linear programming (ILP) formulation for finding compliant assignments using public domain ILP solvers. For the remaining three SoD rules, we demonstrate efficient ways of testing compliance for a given assignment as well as finding compliant assignments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary Kim & Jagdish Gangolly & S. S. Ravi & Daniel J. Rosenkrantz, 2020. "Formal Analysis of Segregation of Duties (SoD) in Accounting: A Computational Approach," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(2), pages 165-212, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:56:y:2020:i:2:p:165-212
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.12190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12190
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.12190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng Gao & Joanna Shuang Wu & Jerold Zimmerman, 2009. "Unintended Consequences of Granting Small Firms Exemptions from Securities Regulation: Evidence from the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(2), pages 459-506, May.
    2. Andrew M. Bauer, 2016. "Tax Avoidance and the Implications of Weak Internal Controls," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 449-486, June.
    3. William R. Kinney, Jr. & Marcy L. Shepardson, 2011. "Do Control Effectiveness Disclosures Require SOX 404(b) Internal Control Audits? A Natural Experiment with Small U.S. Public Companies," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 49(2), pages 413-448, May.
    4. Tirole, Jean, 1986. "Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 181-214, Fall.
    5. Xinghua Gao & Yonghong Jia, 2016. "Internal Control over Financial Reporting and the Safeguarding of Corporate Resources: Evidence from the Value of Cash Holdings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 783-814, June.
    6. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1991. "Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(0), pages 24-52, Special I.
    7. Elsas, Ph.I., 2008. "X-raying Segregation of Duties: Support to illuminate an enterprise's immunity to solo-fraud," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 82-93.
    8. W. Kobelsky, Kevin, 2014. "A conceptual model for segregation of duties: Integrating theory and practice for manual and IT-supported processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 304-322.
    9. William B. Tayler & Robert J. Bloomfield, 2011. "Norms, Conformity, and Controls," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 49(3), pages 753-790, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Rosemary & Hedley, Timothy & Gangolly, Jagdish & Ravi, S.S., 2025. "Segregation of duties in accounting systems: A framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Hanwen & Yang, Daoguang & Zhang, Joseph H. & Zhou, Haiyan, 2020. "Internal controls, risk management, and cash holdings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Anja Schöttner & Veikko Thiele, 2010. "Promotion Tournaments and Individual Performance Pay," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 699-731, September.
    3. Delfgaauw, Josse & Souverijn, Michiel, 2016. "Biased supervision," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 107-125.
    4. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Gabriele Cardullo & Luca Beltrametti, 2025. "Monitoring and prudence," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 221-235, October.
    6. Banerjee, Swapnendu & Chakraborty, Somenath, 2025. "Individual versus Team Production with Social Preferences," MPRA Paper 125933, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Walter Novaes & Luigi Zingales, 2004. "Bureaucracy as a Mechanism to Generate Information," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 35(2), pages 245-259, Summer.
    8. Mui, Vai-Lam, 1995. "The economics of envy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 311-336, May.
    9. W. Kobelsky, Kevin, 2014. "A conceptual model for segregation of duties: Integrating theory and practice for manual and IT-supported processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 304-322.
    10. Wang, Fangjun & Xu, Luying & Zhang, Junrui & Shu, Wei, 2018. "Political connections, internal control and firm value: Evidence from China's anti-corruption campaign," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 53-67.
    11. Ge, Weili & Koester, Allison & McVay, Sarah, 2017. "Benefits and costs of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b) exemption: Evidence from small firms’ internal control disclosures," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 358-384.
    12. Joras Ferwerda & Ioana Sorina Deleanu & Brigitte Unger, 2019. "Strategies to avoid blacklisting: The case of statistics on money laundering," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    13. repec:eee:labchp:v:3:y:1999:i:pb:p:2373-2437 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Andersson, Fredrik, 2004. "A Trickle-Down Theory of Incentives with Applications to Privatization and Outsourcing," Working Papers 2004:13, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    15. Gratton, Gabriele, 2015. "The sound of silence: Political accountability and libel law," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 266-279.
    16. Luc Bernier & Massimo Florio & Philippe Bance, 2020. "The Routledge Handbook of State-Owned Enterprises," Post-Print hal-02613944, HAL.
    17. Agnieszka Rusinowska & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2020. "Ingratiation and Favoritism in Organizations," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 176(3), pages 413-445.
    18. Stefan Petry, 2018. "Mandatory Worker Representation on the Board and Its Effect on Shareholder Wealth," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(1), pages 25-54, March.
    19. Espahbodi, Reza & Espahbodi, Hassan, 2019. "The impact on stock prices of deferral and elimination of internal control audit requirement for small firms," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 158-166.
    20. Zhao, Qiuhong & Ziebart, David A., 2015. "SOX and bondholders' reliance on monitors," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 129-137.
    21. Kim, Rosemary & Hedley, Timothy & Gangolly, Jagdish & Ravi, S.S., 2025. "Segregation of duties in accounting systems: A framework," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:56:y:2020:i:2:p:165-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.