Standard Errors as Weights in Multilateral Price Indexes
A number of multilateral methods for computing price indexes use bilateral comparisons as their basic building blocks. Some of these methods, such as the weighted-EKS and minimum-spanning-tree (MST) methods, give greater weight to those bilateral comparisons that are deemed more reliable (an adjustment that is particularly important for a heterogeneous set of countries). No consensus currently exists in the literature as to the best measure of reliability. Diewert (2002), in particular, proposes a number of reliability measures in an axiomatic setting. Existing measures (including all of Diewert’s), however, fail to penalize bilateral comparisons when there is a small overlap in the products priced by each country. It is exactly in such situations that weighted methods are potentially most useful, but only if the reliability measure penalizes bilateral comparisons containing lots of gaps. Using a stochastic model, we show how the standard errors on bilateral price indexes provide a natural measure of reliability that automatically penalizes comparisons containing lots of gaps. Furthermore, we link these standard errors with the existing literature by showing that they are a generalization of one of Diewert’s reliability measures. This finding provides an interesting new link between the axiomatic and stochastic approaches to index numbers. Also, these standard errors can be modified for use in consumer data sets below the basic-heading level (where no expenditure shares are available), a scenario of direct relevance to the latest round of the International Comparison Program (ICP) currently being undertaken at the World Bank. Finally, we apply our methodology to an international data set on agricultural production that contains a lot of gaps. Our results clearly demonstrate the appeal of weighted methods and the importance of adjusting the reliability measures for gaps in the data. Failure to do so may compromise weighted methods precisely in situations where they a
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 24 (2006)
Issue (Month): (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jbes/index.cfm?fuseaction=main|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.amstat.org/publications/index.html|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:24:y:2006:p:366-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.