IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/ekidpr/y2024i52p21-33.html

Konceptualni Okvir Za Analizu Nejednakih Šansi U Obrazovanju (A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis Of Unequal Opportunities In Education)

Author

Listed:
  • Nemanja Vuksanović

Abstract

Polazeći od veze između obrazovne i dohodne distribucije u zemlji, i važnosti redukcije obrazovnih nejednakosti kako bi se smanjila dohodna nejednakost, u radu je prikazan konceptualni okvir koji istraživačima može poslužiti kao osnov za analizu nejednakih šansi u obrazovanju. U radu su predstavljene osnovne ideje nekoliko teoretičara društvene jednakosti, poput Rolsa, Dvorkina i Sena. Istaknuto je da su upravo Rolsova teorija pravde, Dvorkinovo gledište o jednakim resursima i Senov pristup sposobnostima poslužili kao osnov za ekonomsko modeliranje jednakih šansi u okviru dva različita pristupa. Prvi pristup počiva na formalizaciji pojma jednakosti šansi u ekonomskim modelima koji tretiraju šanse eksplicitno, dok se drugi pristup zasniva na formalnom tretiranju jednakosti šansi u sklopu ekonomskih modela koji šanse posmatraju implicitno. U radu je poseban fokus stavljen na Romerov teorijsko-metodološki okvir koji počiva na potrebi redukcije nejednakosti koje su povezane sa karakteristikama pojedinaca na koje on nema uticaja, uz isticanje razlike između faktora napora i faktora okolnosti.

Suggested Citation

  • Nemanja Vuksanović, 2024. "Konceptualni Okvir Za Analizu Nejednakih Šansi U Obrazovanju (A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis Of Unequal Opportunities In Education)," Ekonomske ideje i praksa, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, issue 52, pages 21-33, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2024:i:52:p:21-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/journals/eip/52/02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John E. Roemer & Alain Trannoy, 2016. "Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1288-1332, December.
    2. Francisco H. G. Ferreira & Jérémie Gignoux, 2014. "The Measurement of Educational Inequality: Achievement and Opportunity," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 28(2), pages 210-246.
    3. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01030825 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. John Weymark, 2003. "Generalized Gini Indices of Equality of Opportunity," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 1(1), pages 5-24, April.
    5. Marc Fleurbaey, 2012. "Three Solutions for the Compensation Problem," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Equality of Opportunity The Economics of Responsibility, chapter 2, pages 33-51, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Kranich, Laurence, 1996. "Equitable Opportunities: An Axiomatic Approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 131-147, October.
    7. Erikson, Robert, 2020. "Inequality of Educational Opportunity – The Role of Performance and Choice," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(S1), pages 44-55, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurence Kranich, 2009. "Measuring opportunity inequality with monetary transfers," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 7(4), pages 371-385, December.
    2. John E. Roemer & Alain Trannoy, 2016. "Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1288-1332, December.
    3. Ferreira, Francisco H. G. & Brunori, Paolo, 2024. "Inherited inequality, meritocracy, and the purpose of economic growth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126263, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Fabio Farella, 2025. "Equality of Opportunity and Efficiency in Tertiary Education: a Data-Driven Perspective," SERIES 02-2025, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza - Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", revised May 2025.
    5. Kristof Bosmans & Z. Emel Öztürk, 2022. "Laissez-faire versus Pareto," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 741-751, May.
    6. Ferreira, Francisco H. G. & Peragine, Vito, 2015. "Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 8994, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Vito Peragine & Laura Serlenga, 2008. "Higher education and equality of opportunity in Italy," Research on Economic Inequality, in: Inequality and Opportunity: Papers from the Second ECINEQ Society Meeting, pages 67-97, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    8. Lanlin Ding & Andrew M. Jones & Peng Nie, 2022. "Ex ante Inequality of Opportunity in Health among the Elderly in China: A Distributional Decomposition Analysis of Biomarkers," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(4), pages 922-950, December.
    9. Vincenzo Carrieri & Apostolos Davillas & Andrew M. Jones, 2023. "Equality of opportunity and the expansion of higher education in the UK," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(4), pages 861-885, December.
    10. Galanis, Giorgos & Napoletano, Mauro & Popoyan, Lilit & Sapio, Alessandro & Vardakoulias, Olivier, 2025. "Defining just transition," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Marc Fleurbaey & Vito Peragine, 2013. "Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Equality of Opportunity," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 80(317), pages 118-130, January.
    12. Guido Neidhöfer & Matías Ciaschi & Leonardo Gasparini, 2022. "Economic Mobility in Latin America: Beyond Education, Stagnant Intergenerational Persistence of Socio-Economic Status," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0303, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    13. Guido Neidhöfer & Leonardo Gasparini & Matias Ciaschi, "undated". "Intergenerational mobility of economic well-being in Latin America," Working Papers 620, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    14. O. Chanel & S. Luchini & M. Teschl & A. Trannoy, 2025. "Preferences for redistributive justice: A participatory-democracy experiment," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 23(3), pages 717-747, September.
    15. Panchanan Das & Sumita Biswas, 2022. "Social Identity, Gender and Unequal Opportunity of Earning in Urban India: 2017–2018 to 2019–2020," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(1), pages 39-57, March.
    16. Peragine, Vitorocco, 2002. "Opportunity egalitarianism and income inequality," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 45-64, September.
    17. Andreas Peichl & Martin Ungerer, 2016. "Accounting for the spouse when measuring inequality of opportunity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(3), pages 607-631, October.
    18. Thomson, William, 2011. "Chapter Twenty-One - Fair Allocation Rules," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 21, pages 393-506, Elsevier.
    19. Kranich, Laurence, 1997. "Equalizing opportunities through public education when innate abilities are unobservable," UC3M Working papers. Economics 7216, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    20. Shahla Akram & Zahid Pervaiz, 2025. "Assessing Inequality of Opportunities for Child Well-being in Pakistan," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(2), pages 525-542, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2024:i:52:p:21-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Lečei (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.