IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p7543-7553.html

Linking Climate Change and Green Consumerism among Young Shoppers

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah

    (Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nadia Hanin Nazlan

    (Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Hafiz Abd Rashid

    (Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Aida Azlina Mansor

    (Faculty of Business and Management, University Technology MARA, 42300 Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

Climate change heightens young consumers’ environmental awareness, yet causal evidence on how climate salience influences their green behaviors in non-Western contexts remains limited. This study applies the Theory of Grounded Cognition to test whether simulated adverse weather events evoke stronger environmental concern, responsibility motivation, and green behavioral intentions. An online between-subjects experiment was conducted with 164 Gen-Z university students in Malaysia, randomly assigned to adverse or normal weather scenarios. Participants completed validated scales measuring environmental concern (EC), environmental responsibility motivation (ERM), green switching intention (GSI), green brand equity (GBE), and green word-of-mouth (GWOM). Manipulation and realism checks confirmed scenario validity. It was found that exposure to adverse weather scenarios significantly increased EC and ERM, as well as GSI and GWOM, compared to the control. No significant effect was found for GBE. The findings provide experimental evidence that climate-salient scenarios intensify affective responses and some pro-environmental behaviors among Gen-Z consumers. However, brand equity evaluations appear less responsive to transient climate salience, suggesting that authentic corporate commitments and transparent practices are required for sustained brand differentiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah & Nadia Hanin Nazlan & Muhammad Hafiz Abd Rashid & Aida Azlina Mansor, 2025. "Linking Climate Change and Green Consumerism among Young Shoppers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 7543-7553, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7543-7553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/7543-7553.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/linking-climate-change-and-green-consumerism-among-young-shoppers/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    2. Esther K. Papies & Maisy Best & Elena Gelibter & Lawrence W. Barsalou, 2017. "The Role of Simulations in Consumer Experiences and Behavior: Insights from the Grounded Cognition Theory of Desire," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 402-418.
    3. Rolf A Zwaan & Diane Pecher, 2012. "Revisiting Mental Simulation in Language Comprehension: Six Replication Attempts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-10, December.
    4. East, Robert & Hammond, Kathy & Lomax, Wendy, 2008. "Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 215-224.
    5. Lawrence Loh & Sharmine Tan, 2020. "Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Brand Value: An Examination of 100 Leading Brands in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Quang-Huy Ngo & Thanh-Dung Nguyen & Nhu-Binh Phan, 2025. "Exploring green purchasing intentions and behaviours among Vietnamese Generation Z: A perspective from the theory of planned behaviour," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Yu-Shan Chen, 2010. "The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 307-319, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philia Vironika & Mira Maulida, 2025. "Green Purchase Behavior in Indonesia: Examining the Role of Knowledge, Trust and Marketing," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, August.
    2. Sara de Sio & Alessandra Zamagni & Giulia Casu & Paola Gremigni, 2022. "Green Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Green Advertising Skepticism, Environmental Knowledge, and Intention to Buy Green Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Sri Widyastuti & Muhammad Said & Safitri Siswono & Dian Andi Firmansyah, 2019. "Customer Trust through Green Corporate Image, Green Marketing Staretgy and Social Responsibility: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 343-359.
    4. Sri Widyastuti & Muhammad Said & Safitri Siswono & Dian Andi Firmansyah, 2019. "Customer Trust through Green Corporate Image, Green Marketing Strategy, and Social Responsibility: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 83-99.
    5. Marcello Risitano & Rosaria Romano & Giuseppe La Ragione & Michele Quintano, 2023. "Analysing the impact of green consumption values on brand responses and behavioural intention," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1096-1112, July.
    6. Jialing (Catherine) Lin & Zhimin Zhou & Fucheng Zheng & Xinru Jiang & Ninh Nguyen, 2023. "How do hotel star ratings affect the relationship between environmental CSR and green word‐of‐mouth?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2651-2663, September.
    7. Jafar Rana Adeel & Shabbir Aiza & Kousar Farzana, 2019. "Impact of Green Practices on Buying Habits in Pakistan’s Food Sector," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 19-30, December.
    8. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Aparna Sundar & James J. Kellaris, 2017. "How Logo Colors Influence Shoppers’ Judgments of Retailer Ethicality: The Mediating Role of Perceived Eco-Friendliness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 685-701, December.
    10. Kara, Karahan & Yalçın, Galip Cihan & Akagün Ergin, Elif & Simic, Vladimir & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "A neutrosophic WENSLO-ARLON model for measuring sustainable brand equity performance," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. María Belén Prados-Peña & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Pedro Núñez-Cacho & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2024. "Intention to purchase sustainable craft products: a moderated mediation analysis of the adoption of sustainability in the craft sector," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 775-797, January.
    12. Anxin Xu & Chenwen Wei & Manhua Zheng & Lili Sun & Decong Tang, 2022. "Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    13. Baxendale, Shane & Macdonald, Emma K. & Wilson, Hugh N., 2015. "The Impact of Different Touchpoints on Brand Consideration," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 235-253.
    14. Jung-Chieh Lee & Ting Li & Lihui Zhang, 2025. "Environmental concerns and green trust in continuous green fintech use: an expectation-confirmation model with insights from Ant Forest," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Luiz Diego Vidal Santos & Francisco Sandro Rodrigues Holanda & Catuxe Varjão Santana Oliveira & Alceu Pedrotti & Pedro Vinícius Bertulino Menezes & Ana Paula Schervinski Villwock, 2023. "Purchase intention of Amazon sustainable brands: a hybrid approach of structural equation modeling and Rasch model," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(12), pages 1-29, December.
    16. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Mohammad Nurul Alam & Osarodion Ogiemwonyi & Ibrahim. E. Hago & Noor Azlinna Azizan & Fariza Hashim & Md Sazzad Hossain, 2023. "Understanding Consumer Environmental Ethics and the Willingness to Use Green Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    18. Munazza Saeed & Arhum Ahmed & Erhan Boğan & Osman Abul & Ahmad Qammar, 2025. "‘Buying green’: the role of green customer-based brand equity in shaping customers’ green buying behavior," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5981-5997, March.
    19. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Enhance environmental commitments and green intangible assets toward green competitive advantages: an analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 529-543, January.
    20. Lianne Foti & Avis Devine, 2019. "High Involvement and Ethical Consumption: A Study of the Environmentally Certified Home Purchase Decision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:7543-7553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.