IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i14p126-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gamification in Supply Chain Management Education: Enhancing Engagement and Learning Outcomes through Game-Based Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram

    (Lecturer, Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Ahmad Rais Mohamad Mokhtar

    (Lecturer, Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Nur 'Asyiqin Ramdhan

    (Lecturer. Department of Economics and Financial Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Irwan Ibrahim

    (Fellow, Malaysia Institute of Transport, Universiti Teknologi MARA, MALAYSIA)

Abstract

This study explores how gamification affects students’ engagement, motivation, and learning in courses focused on Supply Chain Management (SCM). Gamification, or introducing game elements — like points, levels, and leaderboards — to non-game settings, provides interactivity and practical, hands-on learning. In the field of Supply Chain Management (SCM), which requires complex decision-making and real-world applications, it is important for students to build their problem-solving, decision-making, and collaboration skills, and gamified learning environments can facilitate learning in these areas. A gamification approach that categorizes learning materials into cards was applied to multiple SCM topics involving 104 undergraduate students at Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. And data was collected with pre-game and post-game assessments, surveys, participation rates and qualitative feedback. The findings reveal that gamification method led to a significant increase in student engagement, as the participants showed higher motivation and better understanding of SCM principles. The course was gamified and the students outperformed their peers in more traditional settings; they scored better on exams and had a deeper understanding of key concepts. It begins with the contrasting nature of traditional textbooks with SCM, resulting in the need for a higher level of engagement and how gamification can facilitate this process to create a more compel participation atmosphere. Post-implementation challenges such as resistance from students and instructors and the crucial alignment of game mechanics and course content are also discussed. Future studies may examine the application of gamification in other areas, and explore its long-term effects on student learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram & Ahmad Rais Mohamad Mokhtar & Nur 'Asyiqin Ramdhan & Irwan Ibrahim, 2025. "Gamification in Supply Chain Management Education: Enhancing Engagement and Learning Outcomes through Game-Based Techniques," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 126-140, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:14:p:126-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-14/126-140.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/gamification-in-supply-chain-management-education-enhancing-engagement-and-learning-outcomes-through-game-based-techniques/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wong Chee Hoo & Veera Pandiyan Kaliani Sundram & Ahmad Rais Mohamad Mokhtar & Natasha Dzulkalnine & Nur' Asyiqin Ramdhan & Prem Chhetri & Christian Wiradendi Wolor, 2024. "Gamification in supply chain education: A comparative study of supply chain card games and board games in Malaysian tertiary institutions," Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Learning Gate, vol. 8(6), pages 18-30.
    2. John D. Sterman, 1989. "Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 321-339, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sy, Charlle, 2017. "A policy development model for reducing bullwhips in hybrid production-distribution systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 67-79.
    2. Pastore, Erica & Alfieri, Arianna & Zotteri, Giulio, 2019. "An empirical investigation on the antecedents of the bullwhip effect: Evidence from the spare parts industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 121-133.
    3. Berry, D. & Naim, M. M., 1996. "Quantifying the relative improvements of redesign strategies in a P.C. supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 181-196, December.
    4. Towill, Denis R. & Zhou, Li & Disney, Stephen M., 2007. "Reducing the bullwhip effect: Looking through the appropriate lens," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 444-453, July.
    5. Kull, Thomas & Closs, David, 2008. "The risk of second-tier supplier failures in serial supply chains: Implications for order policies and distributor autonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(3), pages 1158-1174, May.
    6. Ademola Amida & Woei Hung & Sameera Algarni, 2024. "System modelling: Exploring engineering students perceptions and learning outcomes," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 598-613, July.
    7. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    8. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    9. Ma, Yungao & Wang, Nengmin & He, Zhengwen & Lu, Jizhou & Liang, Huigang, 2015. "Analysis of the bullwhip effect in two parallel supply chains with interacting price-sensitive demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 815-825.
    10. Rich, Karl M. & Ross, R. Brent & Baker, A. Derek & Negassa, Asfaw, 2011. "Quantifying value chain analysis in the context of livestock systems in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 214-222, April.
    11. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2012. "Bullwhip Effect Measurement and Its Implications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 771-784, August.
    12. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    13. Gérard P. Cachon & Paul H. Zipkin, 1999. "Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 936-953, July.
    14. Zhang, Xiaolong & Burke, Gerard J., 2011. "Analysis of compound bullwhip effect causes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 514-526, May.
    15. Lin, Jinchai & Fan, Ruguo & Tan, Xianchun & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Dynamic decision and coordination in a low-carbon supply chain considering the retailer's social preference," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Arunachalam Narayanan & Brent B. Moritz, 2015. "Decision Making and Cognition in Multi-Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1216-1234, August.
    17. Saeed P. Langarudi & Carlos G. Silva & Alexander G. Fernald, 2021. "Measure more or report faster? Effect of information perception on management of commons," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 37(1), pages 72-92, January.
    18. Charles L. Munson & Jianli Hu & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 2003. "Teaching the Costs of Uncoordinated Supply Chains," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 24-39, June.
    19. Rosanna Cole & Brent Snider, 2020. "Rolling the Dice on Global Supply Chain Sustainability: A Total Cost of Ownership Simulation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 165-176, May.
    20. F Ackermann & C Eden & T Williams & S Howick, 2007. "Systemic risk assessment: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(1), pages 39-51, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:14:p:126-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.