IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i5p1233-1243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Resource Allocation on the Performance of the Kenya Revenue Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Irene Nyakio Ng’ang’a

    (School of Business and Economics, Kenya Methodist University)

  • Gladys Kituku

    (School of Business and Economics, Kenya Methodist University)

  • Joshua Miluwi

    (School of Business and Economics, Kenya Methodist University)

Abstract

Good performance of revenue authority through a steady flow of incomes is an indicator of the financial health of a country in its role of providing: public services, infrastructure, and social programs support. Prioritizing an efficient tax system reduces dependence on foreign aid and also fosters domestic revenue generation. However, developing countries have not been able to finance their budgets internally ending up relying on loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank. These loans become hard to manage with high dependencies on lending institutions becoming debt trap cycles hindering their economic sustainability. Kenya, according to the World Bank (2022), through a debt sustainability report revealed that the present value of total debt to gross domestic product was at 70.5% in 2020, 76.3% in 2022, and is projected to be at 79.2% in October 2023.Huge debt by the Kenyan government running in Trillions of Kenya shillings is attributed to high borrowing from deficiencies in collections by the Kenya Revenue Authority. These unfolding statistics require appropriate strategic initiatives in resource allocation to correct the situation on the performance of the Kenya Revenue Authority. This paper sought to examine the influence of resource allocation on the performance of the Kenya Revenue Authority. The study applied a descriptive research design. The target population for the study was the Kenya Revenue Authority. The unit of analysis included 196 middle-level managers of KRA from the Finance department (87), Human resource department (43), Marketing and communication departments (39), and Corporate service and administration departments (27). The stratified random sampling method and the Slovin formula were applied to obtain a representative sample size of 132 respondents. The study gathered data through online surveys and questionnaires which were physically administered. Data collected was analyzed through both descriptive and inferential analyses. Results revealed a β of 0.691 and a p-value of 0.001, between resource allocation and the performance of KRA. The study concluded that resource allocation had a positive and significant influence on the performance of the Kenya Revenue Authority. The study recommended optimizing resource allocation to align with strategic goals to enhance operational efficiency. Furthermore, the study recommended fostering inclusivity and staff participation to boost organizational resilience and innovation. Moreover, the study recommended prioritizing investment in ICT infrastructure to ensure competitiveness and productivity. Lastly, the study recommended that maintaining adequate staffing levels and empowering employees through training would foster a motivated workforce to enhance KRA’s adaptability, performance, and long-term sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene Nyakio Ng’ang’a & Gladys Kituku & Joshua Miluwi, 2024. "Influence of Resource Allocation on the Performance of the Kenya Revenue Authority," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 1233-1243, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:5:p:1233-1243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-5/1233-1243.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/influence-of-resource-allocation-on-the-performance-of-the-kenya-revenue-authority/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corinne Post & Riikka Sarala & Caroline Gatrell & John E. Prescott, 2020. "Advancing Theory with Review Articles," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 351-376, March.
    2. Barbara Barbieri & Ilaria Buonomo & Maria Luisa Farnese & Paula Benevene, 2021. "Organizational Capital: A Resource for Changing and Performing in Public Administrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Jasinenko & Josephina Steuber, 2023. "Perceived Organizational Purpose: Systematic Literature Review, Construct Definition, Measurement and Potential Employee Outcomes," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1415-1447, September.
    2. Davila, Jessenia & Duran, Patricio & Gómez-Mejía, Luis & Sanchez-Bueno, Maria J., 2023. "Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A meta-analytic integration," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).
    3. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    4. Esther Calderon-Monge & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2024. "The role of digitalization in business and management: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 449-491, February.
    5. Bacq, Sophie & Drover, Will & Kim, Phillip H., 2021. "Writing bold, broad, and rigorous review articles in entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    6. Portocarrero, Florencio & Newbert, Scott & Young, Maia & Zhu, Lily, 2025. "The affective revolution in entrepreneurship: an integrative conceptual review and guidelines for future investigation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 126090, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Bouckenooghe, Dave & Schwarz, Gavin M. & Kanar, Adam & Sanders, Karin, 2021. "Revisiting research on attitudes toward organizational change: Bibliometric analysis and content facet analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 137-148.
    8. David Moroz, 2024. "What does terroir mean? A science mapping of a multidimensional concept," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 889-913, September.
    9. Annebeth Roor & Karen Maas, 2024. "Do impact investors live up to their promise? A systematic literature review on (im)proving investments' impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3707-3732, May.
    10. Sánchez-Pérez, Manuel & Marín-Carrillo, María Belén & Segovia-López, Cristina & Terán-Yépez, Eduardo, 2025. "Bibliometric articles in business and management: Factors affecting production and scholarly impact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Ricardo Chalmeta & Daniel Cabezas‐Hernando & Jailson dos Santos Silva, 2025. "Framework for crowdfunding sustainable development goals projects using blockchain," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2740-2758, April.
    12. Muhammad Khalid Shahid & Aye Aye Khin & Lim Chee Seong & Muhammad Shahbaz & Fiaz Ahmad, 2024. "Mapping the Relationship of Research and Development Expenditures and Economic Growth through Bibliometric Analysis: A Theoretical Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17529-17555, December.
    13. Nezih Altay & Graham Heaslip & Gyöngyi Kovács & Karen Spens & Peter Tatham & Alain Vaillancourt, 2024. "Innovation in humanitarian logistics and supply chain management: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 965-987, April.
    14. Marie Madeleine Meurer & Maksim Belitski & Christian Fisch & Roy Thurik, 2024. "What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1139-1170, October.
    15. Sascha Kraus & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Alba Yela Aránega, 2024. "The burgeoning role of literature review articles in management research: an introduction and outlook," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 299-314, February.
    16. Deike Schlütter & Lena Schätzlein & Rüdiger Hahn & Carolin Waldner, 2024. "Missing the Impact in Impact Investing Research – A Systematic Review and Critical Reflection of the Literature," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(6), pages 2694-2718, September.
    17. Beatriz Ferreira & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira, 2022. "The Contribution of Knowledge Management to Human Resource Development: a Systematic and Integrative Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2319-2347, September.
    18. Sumona Mukhuty & Arvind Upadhyay & Holly Rothwell, 2022. "Strategic sustainable development of Industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2068-2081, July.
    19. Kimberly D. Elsbach & Daan van Knippenberg, 2020. "Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1277-1289, September.
    20. Burström, Thommie & Lahti, Tom & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2024. "Industrial ecosystems: A systematic review, framework and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:5:p:1233-1243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.