IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i11p954-959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boycott Phenomenon from Multiple Societal Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Aliya Waheedah Ahmad Lutfi

    (Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environment, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Abdul Hafiz Ab Rahman

    (Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environment, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Noviatin Syarifuddin

    (Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environment, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia)

  • Sarina Yusoff

    (Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environment, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia)

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of boycotts from various social perspectives, focusing on the conceptual framework that explains this collective action as a form of protest or punishment within society. The study introduces and elaborates on the definition and classification of boycotts, including boycotts by the public, authorities and international bodies. Additionally, the article explores direct and indirect approaches to boycotts, as well as the instrumental and expressive goals of boycotts within different social contexts. Through conceptual analysis, the article highlights the role of social media as a catalyst for boycott movements in Malaysia. The article also emphasizes the importance of a deeper understanding of boycott dynamics and how these concepts can be applied in further research on boycott effectiveness and recovery strategies for affected entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliya Waheedah Ahmad Lutfi & Abdul Hafiz Ab Rahman & Noviatin Syarifuddin & Sarina Yusoff, 2024. "Boycott Phenomenon from Multiple Societal Perspectives," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 954-959, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:954-959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-11/954-959.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/boycott-phenomenon-from-multiple-societal-perspectives/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Sankar & Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep & Morwitz, Vicki, 2001. "Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 399-417, December.
    2. Kim, Changju & Kim, Woonho & Nakami, Shinya, 2022. "Do online sales channels save brands of global companies from consumer boycotts? A geographical analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Kim, Changju & Yan, Xiuyan & Kim, Jungkeun & Terasaki, Shinichiro & Furukawa, Hiroyasu, 2022. "Effect of consumer animosity on boycott campaigns in a cross-cultural context: Does consumer affinity matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Changju & Kinoshita, Akihiro, 2023. "Do you punish or forgive socially responsible companies? A cross-country analysis of boycott campaigns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Kim, Woo Bin & Kim, Changju & Go, I. & Fukuda, Reo & Imai, Marina, 2024. "Actions are more than just words: Relationships between word-of-mouth, personal interaction, and product attachment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Hartl, Barbara & Hofmann, Eva & Kirchler, Erich, 2016. "Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2756-2763.
    4. Zyglidopoulos, Stelios C. & Georgiadis, Andreas P. & Carroll, Craig E. & Siegel, Donald S., 2012. "Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 1622-1627.
    5. Qi Sun & Fang Wu & Shanjun Li & Rajdeep Grewal, 2021. "Consumer Boycotts, Country of Origin, and Product Competition: Evidence from China’s Automobile Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5857-5877, September.
    6. Martijn G. de Jong & Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp & Bernard P. Veldkamp, 2009. "A Model for the Construction of Country-Specific Yet Internationally Comparable Short-Form Marketing Scales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 674-689, 07-08.
    7. Nieves García-de-Frutos & José Manuel Ortega-Egea & Javier Martínez-del-Río, 2018. "Anti-consumption for Environmental Sustainability: Conceptualization, Review, and Multilevel Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 411-435, March.
    8. Daglish, Toby, 2015. "Consumer Governance in Electricity Markets," Working Paper Series 4183, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    9. Francisco-José Cossío-Silva & María-Ángeles Revilla-Camacho & Beatriz Palacios-Florencio & Dolores Garzón Benítez, 2019. "How to face a political boycott: the relevance of entrepreneurs’ awareness," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 321-339, June.
    10. SandIkcI, Özlem & Ekici, Ahmet, 2009. "Politically motivated brand rejection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 208-217, February.
    11. Iyer, Rajesh & Muncy, James A., 2009. "Purpose and object of anti-consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 160-168, February.
    12. Nils Christian Hoffmann & Juelin Yin & Stefan Hoffmann, 2020. "Chain of Blame: A Multi-country Study of Consumer Reactions Towards Supplier Hypocrisy in Global Supply Chains," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 247-286, April.
    13. Fong, Cher-Min & Chang, Hsing-Hua Stella & Lin, Mong-Ching & Chen, I-Hung, 2022. "Reexamining emerging market animosity toward western developed countries: A social dilemma in physical retailing consumption under normative influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. William B. Tayler & Robert J. Bloomfield, 2011. "Norms, Conformity, and Controls," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 49(3), pages 753-790, June.
    15. Yuksel, Ulku & Mryteza, Victoria, 2009. "An evaluation of strategic responses to consumer boycotts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 248-259, February.
    16. Mukherjee, Ashesh & Lee, Seung Yun & Burnham, Thomas, 2020. "The effect of others’ participation on charitable behavior: Moderating role of recipient resource scarcity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 213-228.
    17. Kim, Changju & Yan, Xiuyan & Kim, Jungkeun & Terasaki, Shinichiro & Furukawa, Hiroyasu, 2022. "Effect of consumer animosity on boycott campaigns in a cross-cultural context: Does consumer affinity matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Barbara Duffek & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Omar Merlo, 2023. "Why so toxic? A framework for exploring customer toxicity," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 122-143, June.
    19. Mahdi Mahmoudzadeh & Aadhaar Chaturvedi, 2024. "A Behavioral Model of Responsible Sourcing in Supply Chains: The Role of Dual-Sourcing Bias," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 196-214, December.
    20. Kristina Haberstroh & Ulrich R. Orth & Stefan Hoffmann & Berit Brunk, 2017. "Consumer Response to Unethical Corporate Behavior: A Re-Examination and Extension of the Moral Decoupling Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 161-173, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:954-959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.