Author
Abstract
Women’s empowerment has become a central objective in agricultural research for development, yet its complex, context-specific nature poses conceptual, methodological, and operational challenges. This article reflects on a long-term, feminist-informed collaboration of more than a decade that used mixed methods to study women’s empowerment in agriculture across diverse projects, countries, and research teams. Drawing on quantitative indices, including adaptations of the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI and pro-WEAI), and complementary qualitative work, the collaboration interrogated how empowerment is defined, measured, and experienced, and how these understandings evolve over time. Mixed methods were applied within single projects, across related sub-projects, and cumulatively across projects to generate insights into joint asset ownership, intra-household decision-making, time use, and agency, revealing empowerment as multidimensional, relational, and dynamic rather than a static outcome. The article examines how sustained collaboration among researchers from the Global North and South, and across disciplines, challenged assumptions embedded in standardized measures, sharpened conceptual precision, and exposed tensions between instrumental and intrinsic, as well as individual and collective forms of agency. It also highlights the institutional conditions that enable meaningful collaboration—particularly long-term funding, leadership, and iterative learning processes—and how these conditions shape knowledge production and policy influence. The article concludes by proposing priorities for the next generation of agricultural research for development on women’s empowerment, including deeper integration of qualitative inquiry, attention to shifting norms and power relations, and the continued co-development of metrics that remain sensitive to context while enabling comparison across interventions and time.
Suggested Citation
Shelton Chinorumba, 2026.
"Women’s Empowerment, Mixed Methods, And Long-Term Collaboration in Agricultural Research for Development,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(3), pages 334-342, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:334-342
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:334-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.