IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199888111699-1701_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician financial incentives and feedback: Failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care

Author

Listed:
  • Hillman, A.L.
  • Ripley, K.
  • Goldfarb, N.
  • Nuamah, I.
  • Weiner, J.
  • Lusk, E.

Abstract

Objectives. A randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of feedback and financial incentives on physician compliance with cancer screening guidelines for women 50 years of age and older in a Medicaid health maintenance organization (HMO). Methods. Half of 52 primary care sites received the intervention, which included written feedback and a financial bonus. Mammography, breast exam, colorectal screening, and Pap testing compliance rates were evaluated. Results. From 1993 to 1995, screening rates doubled overall (from 24% to 50%), with no significant differences between intervention and control group sites. Conclusions. Financial incentives and feedback did not improve physician compliance with cancer screening guidelines in a Medicaid HMO.

Suggested Citation

  • Hillman, A.L. & Ripley, K. & Goldfarb, N. & Nuamah, I. & Weiner, J. & Lusk, E., 1998. "Physician financial incentives and feedback: Failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(11), pages 1699-1701.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:11:1699-1701_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panayotis Constantinou & Jonathan Sicsic & Carine Franc, 2017. "Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 181-201, June.
    2. Herbst, T. & Foerster, J. & Emmert, M., 2018. "The impact of pay-for-performance on the quality of care in ophthalmology: Empirical evidence from Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 667-673.
    3. Frolich, Anne & Talavera, Jason A. & Broadhead, Peter & Dudley, R. Adams, 2007. "A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 179-193, January.
    4. Claudia Keser & Emmanuel Peterlé & Cornelius Schnitzler, 2014. "Money talks - Paying physicians for performance," CIRANO Working Papers 2014s-41, CIRANO.
    5. Grant Miller & Kimberly Singer Babiarz, 2013. "Pay-for-Performance Incentives in Low- and Middle-Income Country Health Programs," NBER Working Papers 18932, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Asadi-Aliabadi, Mehran & Karimi, Seyed M & Tehrani-Banihashemi, Arash & Mirbaha-Hashemi, Fariba & Janani, Leila & Babaee, Ebrahim & Nojomi, Marzieh & Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar, 2022. "Effectiveness of pay for performance to non-physician health care providers: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(7), pages 592-602.
    7. Philippe Batifoulier & Maryse Gadreau & Yves Arrighi & Yann Videau & Bruno Ventelou, 2009. "Disentangling extrinsic and intrinsic motivations: the case of French GPs dealing with prevention," Working Papers hal-04140879, HAL.
    8. Jinhu Li & Jeremiah Hurley & Philip DeCicca & Gioia Buckley, 2014. "Physician Response To Pay‐For‐Performance: Evidence From A Natural Experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(8), pages 962-978, August.
    9. Frank Eijkenaar, 2013. "Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(1), pages 117-131, February.
    10. Singh, Prakarsh & Masters, William A., 2017. "Impact of caregiver incentives on child health: Evidence from an experiment with Anganwadi workers in India," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 219-231.
    11. Robyn, Paul Jacob & Bärnighausen, Till & Souares, Aurélia & Traoré, Adama & Bicaba, Brice & Sié, Ali & Sauerborn, Rainer, 2014. "Provider payment methods and health worker motivation in community-based health insurance: A mixed-methods study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 223-236.
    12. Randall P. Ellis & Bruno Martins & Michelle McKinnon Miller, 2015. "Provider Payment Methods and Incentives," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series wp2015-023, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    13. Nicolas da Silva, 2012. "Motivation et performance des médecins. Un examen de la littérature empirique," Post-Print hal-01480872, HAL.
    14. Lee, Jin Yong & Lee, Sang-Il & Kim, Nam-Soon & Kim, Seon-Ha & Son, Woo-Seung & Jo, Min-Woo, 2012. "Healthcare organizations’ attitudes toward pay-for-performance in Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 277-285.
    15. Linda Alley & Brian S. Armour & Jeff Etchason & Carol Friedman & M. Melinda Pitts & Jennifer Wike, 2003. "The influence of year-end bonuses on colorectal cancer screening," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2003-41, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    16. Mauro, Marianna & Rotundo, Giorgia & Giancotti, Monica, 2019. "Effect of financial incentives on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening delivery rates: Results from a systematic literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1210-1220.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:11:1699-1701_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.