IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aip/access/v4y2023i1p85-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects for intermodal and container transportation for Georgia's integration into the global transport market

Author

Listed:
  • Badri GECHBAIA

    (Navigation Teaching University, Batumi, Georgia
    Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, Batumi, Georgia)

  • Amiran TSILOSANI

    (Navigation Teaching University, Batumi, Georgia)

Abstract

Objectives: Understanding of advantages and disadvantages of Georgia as a transport corridor country in intermodal transportation. The challenges, strong and weak spots of intermodal transportation through the transport corridor on which lays Georgia. Overview of existing Black Sea basin and Georgian seaports and container terminals, their throughputs, and obstacles inherent for the container business in the black sea in common, which is the main obstacle to receiving bigger vessels. Methods/Approach: During the research has been used empirical and theoretical methods. In order to study container shipping has been reviewed and analyzed the data published by Georgian and foreign publications and scientific works, which made it possible to study the current situation and dynamics of container shipping in Georgia, as well as to study and investigate the existing problems and factors in this sphere, which affected the increase in the volume of cargo turnover. Analyzing the data provided by different information sources such as the National Statistical Office, shipping companies, terminal operators, and government bodies, made it possible to observe the increase in container shipping in recent years and calculate the cumulative average gross rate of container turnovers. Results: It was determined and explained that intermodal land transportation of containers through Georgia could not compete with maritime transportation turnovers, but still has a significant part as a backup of alternative transportation modes and delivery terms. Also, has been found that the growing trend of container turnover in the Black Sea countries and Georgia, in particular, has a strong and positive dynamic. Conclusions: The study shows how Georgia, as an intermodal and transit transportation country, improved its cargo turnover in a time of ongoing challenges in the region. It also shows the causal relationship between the sanctions and increased cargo turnover through the Georgian Sea ports. As a recommendation is provided suggestions to improve Georgia's cargo turnover and throughput.

Suggested Citation

  • Badri GECHBAIA & Amiran TSILOSANI, 2023. "Prospects for intermodal and container transportation for Georgia's integration into the global transport market," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 4(1), pages 85-101, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:85-101
    DOI: 10.46656/access.2023.4.1(7)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.access-bg.org/journalfiles/journal/issue-4-1-2023/prospects_for_intermodal_and_container_transportation_for_georgias_integration.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46656/access.2023.4.1(7)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abraham Zhang & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & George Q. Huang, 2014. "Port strategy in the era of supply chain management: the case of Hong Kong," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 367-383, July.
    2. Caris, An & Limbourg, Sabine & Macharis, Cathy & van Lier, Tom & Cools, Mario, 2014. "Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chain: a taxonomy of research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 126-136.
    3. Tomas Ambra & An Caris & Cathy Macharis, 2019. "Towards freight transport system unification: reviewing and combining the advancements in the physical internet and synchromodal transport research," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(6), pages 1606-1623, March.
    4. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony K C Beresford, 2011. "Port evolution and performance in changing logistics environments," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 13(3), pages 250-277, September.
    5. Lai, Kee-hung, 2004. "Service capability and performance of logistics service providers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 385-399, September.
    6. Nathalie Fabbe-Costes & Christine Roussat & Jacques Colin, 2011. "Future sustainable supply chains: what should companies scan in their environment?," Post-Print hal-01419258, HAL.
    7. Laurent Fedi & Alexandre Lavissière & Dawn Russel & David Swanson, 2019. "The facilitating role of IT systems for legal compliance: the case of Port Community Systems and container Verified Gross Mass (VGM)," Post-Print hal-02062142, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Bu & Heather Nachtmann, 2023. "Literature review and comparative analysis of inland waterways transport: “Container on Barge”," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 140-173, March.
    2. Hsiao, H.I. & Kemp, R.G.M. & van der Vorst, J.G.A.J. & (Onno) Omta, S.W.F., 2010. "A classification of logistic outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 75-86, March.
    3. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rei, Walter & Rosano, Mariangela & Lerma, Veronica, 2024. "Capacity planning with uncertainty on contract fulfillment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 152-175.
    4. Alexandre Lavissiere & Tibor Mandják & Julian Hofmann & Laurent Fedi, 2019. "Port marketing as manifestation of sustainable marketing in a B2B context," Post-Print hal-02904470, HAL.
    5. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.
    6. Chargui, Tarik & Ladier, Anne-Laure & Bekrar, Abdelghani & Pan, Shenle & Trentesaux, Damien, 2022. "Towards designing and operating physical internet cross-docks: Problem specifications and research perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Vanessa Rodríguez Cornejo & Ángel Cervera Paz & Luis López Molina & Víctor Pérez-Fernández, 2020. "Lean Thinking to Foster the Transition from Traditional Logistics to the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Bart Van Riessen & Judith Mulder & Rudy R. Negenborn & Rommert Dekker, 2021. "Revenue management with two fare classes in synchromodal container transportation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 623-662, September.
    9. Johannes Rentschler & Ralf Elbert & Felix Weber, 2022. "Promoting Sustainability through Synchromodal Transportation: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Fields of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Marasco, Alessandra, 2008. "Third-party logistics: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 127-147, May.
    11. Leung, Eric K.H. & Lee, Carmen Kar Hang & Ouyang, Zhiyuan, 2022. "From traditional warehouses to Physical Internet hubs: A digital twin-based inbound synchronization framework for PI-order management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    12. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Florian Hofbauer & Lisa-Maria Putz, 2020. "External Costs in Inland Waterway Transport: An Analysis of External Cost Categories and Calculation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Yui-Yip Lau & Adolf Ky Ng & David Guerrero, 2014. "Becoming a major hub in the distribution of wine: Hong Kong as a gate to Asian markets," Post-Print hal-01069882, HAL.
    15. Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Dong, 2016. "Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 51-57.
    16. Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2021. "The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Ramaekers, Katrien & Verdonck, Lotte & Caris, An & Meers, Dries & Macharis, Cathy, 2017. "Allocating collaborative costs in multimodal barge networks for freight bundling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 56-69.
    18. Pan, Fei & Pan, Shenle & Zhou, Wei & Fan, Tijun, 2022. "Perishable product bundling with logistics uncertainty: Solution based on physical internet," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    19. Tsung-Yu Chou & Yen-Ting Chen, 2020. "Applying Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Method to Identify Key Organizational Capabilities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Feng, Xuehao & Song, Rui & Yin, Wenwei & Yin, Xiaowei & Zhang, Ruiyou, 2023. "Multimodal transportation network with cargo containerization technology: Advantages and challenges," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 128-143.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:85-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mariana Petrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://access-bg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.