IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v60y2021i2p141-170.html

Barriers to the Development of Port Operator Supply Chain Integration: An Evaluation in a Developing Country

Author

Listed:
  • Murilo Branco
  • Rafael Teixeira
  • Saif Mir
  • Daniel P. Lacerda

Abstract

In this multimethod research, we build on the customer portfolio literature to theorize a two‐dimensional matrix between the strategic importance of a port operator's customers and the customers’ perceptions of the port operator's supply chain integration (SCI). The matrix highlights two mismatches: (1) important customers do not perceive a high degree of port operator SCI; and (2) low‐importance customers perceive a high degree of port operator SCI. In the former, the port operator's investments are wasted, while in the latter the port operator reaps benefits from minimal investments. In our first study, we classify 1,441 customers of a Brazilian port operator into three levels of strategic importance: high, medium, and low. A survey instrument sent to these customers measured the perceived port operators’ SCI by 210 customers, and the analysis revealed a mismatch for 76 percent of the companies. The second study examines the reasons for the mismatch. Semi‐structured interviews highlighted that the perceived unfairness of the port operator's operational decision making and negative experiences with other supply chain members negatively affected the SCI perceptions of customers. We also found a spillover effect: low‐importance customers perceived a high level of SCI due to the port operator's operational investments in its important customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Murilo Branco & Rafael Teixeira & Saif Mir & Daniel P. Lacerda, 2021. "Barriers to the Development of Port Operator Supply Chain Integration: An Evaluation in a Developing Country," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 141-170, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:60:y:2021:i:2:p:141-170
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.60.2.0141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.60.2.0141
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.60.2.0141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kum Fai Yuen & Xueqin Wang & Fei Ma & Gunwoo Lee & Xiangyi Li, 2019. "Critical success factors of supply chain integration in container shipping: an application of resource-based view theory," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 653-668, August.
    2. Khalid Bichou & Richard Gray, 2004. "A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 47-67, January.
    3. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Hilde Meersman & Eddy Van de Voorde, 2012. "Unveiling Supply Chain Integration And Its Value In Container Shipping," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 39(2).
    4. Saif Mir & John A. Aloysius & Stephanie Eckerd, 2017. "Understanding Supplier Switching Behavior: The Role of Psychological Contracts in a Competitive Setting," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(3), pages 3-18, July.
    5. Abraham Zhang & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & George Q. Huang, 2014. "Port strategy in the era of supply chain management: the case of Hong Kong," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 367-383, July.
    6. Gaviria, Alejandro, 2002. "Assessing the effects of corruption and crime on firm performance: evidence from Latin America," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 245-268, September.
    7. Tongzon, Jose & Chang, Young-Tae & Lee, Sang-Yoon, 2009. "How supply chain oriented is the port sector?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 21-34, November.
    8. Talley, Wayne K., 2014. "Maritime transport chains: carrier, port and shipper choice effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 174-179.
    9. S. J. Pettit & A. K. C. Beresford, 2009. "Port development: from gateways to logistics hubs," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 253-267, June.
    10. Hesping, Frank Henrik & Schiele, Holger, 2016. "Matching tactical sourcing levers with the Kraljič matrix: Empirical evidence on purchasing portfolios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 101-117.
    11. Cruz, Jose M. & Liu, Zugang, 2011. "Modeling and analysis of the multiperiod effects of social relationship on supply chain networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(1), pages 39-52, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V.G. Venkatesh & Abraham Zhang & Eric Deakins & Venkatesh Mani & Yangyan Shi, 2020. "Supply Chain Integration Barriers to Port‐Centric Logistics—An Emerging Economy Perspective," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3), pages 215-253, July.
    2. Leonie C.E. Stevens & Iris F.A. Vis, 2016. "Port supply chain integration: analyzing biofuel supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 261-279, April.
    3. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    4. Talley, Wayne K., 2014. "Maritime transport chains: carrier, port and shipper choice effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 174-179.
    5. Abraham Zhang & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2014. "Impacts of Schedule Reliability and Sailing Frequency on the Liner Shipping and Port Industry: A Study of Daily Maersk," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 235-253, April.
    6. Bowei Xu & Junjun Li & Yongsheng Yang & Huafeng Wu & Octavian Postolache, 2019. "Model and Resilience Analysis for Handling Chain Systems in Container Ports," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, July.
    7. Brinker, Janosch & Haasis, Hans-Dietrich, 2020. "The impact of an asymmetric allocation of power on the digitalization strategy of port logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 457-484, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    8. Wang, Ping & Mileski, Joan & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2019. "Toward a taxonomy of container terminals’ practices and performance: A contingency and configuration study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 92-107.
    9. Zheng, Shiyuan & Ge, Ying-En & Fu, Xiaowen & (Marco) Nie, Yu & Xie, Chi, 2020. "Demand information sharing in port concession arrangements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 118-143.
    10. Young‐Tae Chang & Wayne K. Talley, 2019. "Port Competitiveness, Efficiency, and Supply Chains: A Literature Review," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Aaron Soans & Masato Abe, 2015. "Bribery, Corruption and Bureaucratic Hassle: Evidence from Myanmar," ARTNeT Working Papers 152, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    12. Fei Fan & Xuerong Zhang & Wenyi Yang & Chengliang Liu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of China's Ports in the International Container Transport Network under Upgraded Industrial Structure," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 43-69, January.
    13. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    15. Rania Missaoui & Aymen Ajina, 2026. "Firm dynamics in corrupt environments: the case of the BRICS countries," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-38, February.
    16. Jiang, Lijun & Li, Zhi-Chun & Fu, Xiaowen, 2026. "Accessorial value-added services in inland river port: Self-operating or outsourcing?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    17. Zhao, Xiaofei & Wang, Ping & Pal, Raktim, 2021. "The effects of agro-food supply chain integration on product quality and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese agro-food processing business," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    18. Kyunga Na & Young-Hee Kang & Yang Sok Kim, 2018. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Corruption of Firms in BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India & China)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Lurdes Martins & Jorge Cerdeira & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2020. "Does corruption boost or harm firms’ performance in developing and emerging economies? A firm‐level study," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 2119-2152, August.
    20. Badri GECHBAIA & Amiran TSILOSANI, 2023. "Prospects for intermodal and container transportation for Georgia's integration into the global transport market," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 4(1), pages 85-101, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:60:y:2021:i:2:p:141-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.