IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/journl/v29y2023i1p34-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Policy Implementation to Support Innovation in Industrial Sector: A Case Study of the Textile Industry in Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Siqintana

    (University of Finance and Economics, Mongolia.)

  • Oyuntsetseg Luvsandondov

    (Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Mongolia.)

  • Batkhuyag Ganbaatar

    (University of Finance and Economics, Mongolia.)

  • Saiyinjiya

    (Inner Mongolia Medical University, China.)

  • Bolor Khurelchuluun

    (Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.)

Abstract

In the contemporary context, innovation stands as the primary propulsive agent in steering the course of social and economic advancement within any given nation. In accordance with prevailing global trends, nations have attained noteworthy accomplishments through the formulation and execution of innovation policies designed to enhance the progress of their domestic and sector-specific landscapes. The efficacy of any policy hinges upon its formulation with a forward-looking vision, steadfast implementation, and rigorous evaluation of outcomes. Innovation policy, as a pivotal instrument, assumes a guiding role in the advancement of a nation, region, and industry, informed by scientific and technological achievements, knowledge reservoirs, and innovative endeavors. Commencing in the latter part of the 1970s, China embarked upon a trajectory characterized by the implementation of an open economic policy. Within this overarching framework, notable emphasis has been placed on the widespread assimilation of scientific and technological progress, with particular emphasis on the industrial domain. This commitment to fostering technological prowess culminated in the formal adoption of the "Innovation-Oriented Economic Development Strategy" in the year 2006. This milestone document represents the government's inaugural articulation of its primary policy directive pertaining to innovation-driven economic development. The focus of this study centers on the examination of relatively large factories engaged in the production of wool and cashmere products within the textile industry of Inner Mongolia, China. The research encompasses an investigation into the developmental experiences related to innovation within this sector. Furthermore, it includes an analysis of the innovation policy endorsed by the government for this industry, along with an evaluation of its practical implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Siqintana & Oyuntsetseg Luvsandondov & Batkhuyag Ganbaatar & Saiyinjiya & Bolor Khurelchuluun, 2023. "Evaluation of Policy Implementation to Support Innovation in Industrial Sector: A Case Study of the Textile Industry in Inner Mongolia, China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 29(1), pages 34-55.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:29:y:2023:i:1:p:34-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/2233.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsab.com/volume-29-issue-1/6232
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhifeng Zhang & Hongyan Duan & Shuangshuang Shan & Qingzhi Liu & Wenhui Geng, 2022. "The Impact of Green Credit on the Green Innovation Level of Heavy-Polluting Enterprises—Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Choi, Suk Bong & Lee, Soo Hee & Williams, Christopher, 2011. "Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 441-452, April.
    3. Yanting Wang & Lin Zhao, 2017. "Outward Foreign Direct Investment from China: Recent Trend and Development," Chinese Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 356-365, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Zhuan & Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Roads to innovation: Firm-level evidence from China:," IFPRI discussion papers 1542, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Nadia Loukil & Ouidad Yousfi, 2022. "Do CEO’s traits matter in innovation outcomes?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 375-403, September.
    4. Popli, Manish & Ladkani, Radha M. & Gaur, Ajai S., 2017. "Business group affiliation and post-acquisition performance: An extended resource-based view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 21-30.
    5. Wu, Aihua, 2017. "The signal effect of Government R&D Subsidies in China: Does ownership matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 339-345.
    6. Thi-Thanh Phan & Hai-Chin Yu, 2022. "Innovation, institutional ownerships and board diversity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1647-1693, November.
    7. Choi, Paul Moon Sub & Chung, Chune Young & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Wang, Kainan, 2020. "Are better-governed firms more innovative? Evidence from Korea," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 263-279.
    8. Paolo Castelnuovo & Stefano Clo & Massimo Florio, 2021. "Space policy drives innovation through technological procurement: evidence from Italy," Working Papers - Economics wp2021_08.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    9. Jianghua Zhou & Zixu Liu & Jizhen Li & Gupeng Zhang, 2021. "Foreign equity, exporting and firm innovation: an emerging market perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 606-628, June.
    10. Peng Xu & Heng Zhang & Guiyu Bai, 2019. "Research on the Differentiated Impact Mechanism of Parent Company Shareholding and Managerial Ownership on Subsidiary Responsive Innovation: Empirical Analysis Based on ‘Principal–Agent’ Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Robert Grosse & Jonas Gamso & Roy C. Nelson, 2021. "China’s Rise, World Order, and the Implications for International Business," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Amit Karna & Ansgar Richter & Eberhard Riesenkampff, 2016. "Revisiting the role of the environment in the capabilities–financial performance relationship: A meta-analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1154-1173, June.
    13. Ani Manakyan Mathers & Bin Wang & Xiaohong (Sara) Wang, 2020. "Shareholder coordination and corporate innovation," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5-6), pages 730-759, May.
    14. Da Teng & Jingtao Yi, 2017. "Impact of ownership types on R&D intensity and innovation performance—evidence from transitional China," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Kong, Dongmin & Zhu, Ling & Yang, Zhiqing, 2020. "Effects of foreign investors on energy firms' innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Zhongju Liao & Manting Zhang & Xiaopeng Wang, 2019. "Do female directors influence firms' environmental innovation? The moderating role of ownership type," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 257-263, January.
    17. Kim, Youngok & Lui, Steven S., 2015. "The impacts of external network and business group on innovation: Do the types of innovation matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1964-1973.
    18. Yang, Yang & Jiang, Yan, 2023. "Does suppliers’ slack influence the relationship between buyers’ environmental orientation and green innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Qing Xie & Hua Yin, 2023. "Institutional Differences and the Choice of Outward Foreign Direct Investment Mode under the “Belt and Road” Initiative: Experience Analysis Based on China’s Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    20. A. Ashwin & Rishikesha Krishnan & Rejie George, 2015. "Family firms in India: family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 869-900, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:29:y:2023:i:1:p:34-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.