IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/saebjn/v64y2017i1p1-18n55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Of Pay For Performance Programs In Romanian Companies And The Mediating Role Of Organizational Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian URIESI

Abstract

The present research examined the influences of pay for performance programs on employee performance in the Romanian context, by comparing a sample of employees in companies in which such programs are implemented to a sample of employees in organizations in which performance is not used as a criterion in deciding financial rewards. Results show that the work performances of the former, as evaluated by the direct supervisors of each employee, are significantly higher than those of the latter, and that this effect of performance pay is partly mediated by its positive effects on employee perceptions of distributive and procedural justice. Furthermore, results indicate that the individual – level financial incentive systems are more efficient in fostering work performance than the team – level performance pay programs in the Romanian employee sample, and that they also have stronger effects on the two dimensions of organizational justice. JEL Codes - M52, L25, D63

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian URIESI, 2017. "Efficiency Of Pay For Performance Programs In Romanian Companies And The Mediating Role Of Organizational Justice," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 64(1), pages 1-18, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:64:y:2017:i:1:p:1-18:n:55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/1044
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Origo, Federica, 2009. "Flexible pay, firm performance and the role of unions. New evidence from Italy," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 64-78, January.
    2. Cohen-Charash, Yochi & Spector, Paul E., 2001. "The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 278-321, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel-Florin Dä‚Niloaia & Maria Viorica Bedrule Grigoruèšä‚, 2022. "The Expectations Of Graduates From Employers In The North-East Romania Region," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 30, pages 79-90, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenot, David & Boutakidis, Ioakim & Benton, Amy D., 2014. "Equity and fairness perceptions in the child welfare workforce," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 400-406.
    2. Riccardo Leoni, 2018. "Efficienza ed efficacia della contrattazione integrativa aziendale. Una rassegna della letteratura empirica italiana," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 1, pages 131-170.
    3. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Siegrist, Michael, 2012. "Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 292-300.
    4. Lucifora, Claudio & Origo, Federica, 2025. "Rigid Yet Resilient: Firms' Margins of Adjustment to Demand Shocks in Regulated Labour Markets," IZA Discussion Papers 17670, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Akduman, Gülbeniz & Yüksekbilgili, Zeki & Hatipoğlu, Zeynep, 2014. "Medeni Durumuna Göre Örgütsel Adalet Algısı [Organizational Justice Perception According to Marital Status]," MPRA Paper 62745, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Kedar Bhatt, 2020. "Measuring service fairness and its impact on service quality and satisfaction: a study of Indian Banking Services," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 35-44, June.
    7. Davide Antonioli & Paolo Pini & Roberto Antonietti, 2014. "Flexible pay systems and labour productivity: Evidence from Emilia-Romagna manufacturing firms," Working Papers 2014143, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    8. Gumusluoglu, Lale & Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Zahide & Hirst, Giles, 2013. "Transformational leadership and R&D workers' multiple commitments: Do justice and span of control matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2269-2278.
    9. Scheuerman, Heather L., 2013. "The relationship between injustice and crime: A general strain theory approach," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 375-385.
    10. Taylor, Olivia Elizabeth Vere & Philpot, Richard & Fitton, Oliver & Walkington, Zoë & Levine, Mark, 2024. "Police whistleblowing: A systematic review of the likelihood (and the barriers and facilitators) of the willingness of police officers to report the misconduct of fellow officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Amy R. Ward & Mor Armony, 2013. "Blind Fair Routing in Large-Scale Service Systems with Heterogeneous Customers and Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 228-243, February.
    12. Ozgur Demirtas & Sean T. Hannah & Kubilay Gok & Aykut Arslan & Nejat Capar, 2017. "The Moderated Influence of Ethical Leadership, Via Meaningful Work, on Followers’ Engagement, Organizational Identification, and Envy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 183-199, September.
    13. Amar Fall & Fatéma Safy-Godineau & David Carassus, 2018. "Perceptions de justice organisationnelle dans les collectivités locales : quels impacts sur le bien-être psychologique au travail et sur l’intention de quitter des agents ?," Post-Print hal-02142237, HAL.
    14. Huo, Baofeng & Wang, Zhiqiang & Tian, Yu, 2016. "The impact of justice on collaborative and opportunistic behaviors in supply chain relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 12-23.
    15. Xinyan Wang & Jianqiao Liao & Degen Xia & Tao Chang, 2010. "The impact of organizational justice on work performance," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(6), pages 660-677, September.
    16. Dulebohn, James H. & Conlon, Donald E. & Sarinopoulos, Issidoros & Davison, Robert B. & McNamara, Gerry, 2009. "The biological bases of unfairness: Neuroimaging evidence for the distinctiveness of procedural and distributive justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 140-151, November.
    17. Fukushima, Kazunori & Yamada, Akihiro, 2024. "Does budget target setting lead managers to engage in unethical behavior for the organization?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4).
    18. DeConinck, James B., 2009. "The effect of leader-member exchange on turnover among retail buyers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1081-1086, November.
    19. Thuy-Van Tran & Sinikka Lepistö & Janne Järvinen, 2021. "The relationship between subjectivity in managerial performance evaluation and the three dimensions of justice perception," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 369-399, September.
    20. Hentschker, Corinna, 2017. "From dusk till dawn - Are nights a dangerous time for hospital admissions?," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168056, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    performance pay; work performance; organizational justice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M52 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:64:y:2017:i:1:p:1-18:n:55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.