IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ssaaea/113245.html

Cooperatives, Credit Unions, and Social Engagement in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Kennedy, Travis

Abstract

Co-operatives serve as engines for local economies; generating and retaining local wealth, operating through existing social networks within communities and providing economic opportunities for local people. Is there a correlation between levels of social engagement and the presence of co-operatives and credit unions? Using the Statistics Canada GSS survey, 2003 and Environics Analytics, Business Locations data it is possible to assess the linkages between social engagement and the presence of cooperatives in Canada. Linkages between demographics (including the breakdown of rural/urban co-operatives and credit unions) and social engagement we isolated volunteerism as a dependant variable in logit regressions. It was established that: across Canada, the older people are, if an individual is female, the larger her or his household is, the less TV he or she watches, the more she or he uses internet, the higher the rate of highschool graduation, the more trusting people are of their neighbours, the more rural an area is, the more fully employed people are, the less likely they are to say no to volunteerism. Although, in all provinces the rural areas have higher levels of social engagement, social engagement is not a direct indicator for the existence of higher levels of co-operative businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Kennedy, Travis, 2007. "Cooperatives, Credit Unions, and Social Engagement in Canada," SS-AAEA Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2007, pages 1-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ssaaea:113245
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.113245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/113245/files/Paper9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.113245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael L. Cook & Fabio R. Chaddad, 2004. "Redesigning Cooperative Boundaries: The Emergence of New Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1249-1253.
    2. Ellen Goddard, 2002. "Factors Underlying the Evolution of Farm-related Cooperatives in Alberta," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(4), pages 473-495, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 3847, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    2. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 18942, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    3. Damien Rousselière, 2019. "A Flexible Approach to Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Comparing the Life Duration for Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Enterprises Using a Bayesian Generalized Additive Discrete Time Survival Model," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(4), pages 829-855, December.
    4. Yevhen Baranchenko & David Oglethorpe, 2012. "The Potential Environmental Benefits of Co‐Operative Businesses Within the Climate Change Agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 197-210, March.
    5. Dentoni, Domenico & Menozzi, Davide & Capelli, Maria Giacinta, 2012. "Group heterogeneity and cooperation on the geographical indication regulation: The case of the “Prosciutto di Parma” Consortium," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 207-216.
    6. Maryline Filippi, 2014. "Using the Regional Advantage: French Agricultural Cooperatives' Economic and Governance Tool," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 597-615, December.
    7. Bošková, Iveta, . "Collaboration in the Czech Dairy Chain," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(4), pages 1-11.
    8. Höhler Julia, 2017. "Heterogenität von Mitgliederstrukturen als Herausforderung für Genossenschaften im Agribusiness," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 21-35, March.
    9. Ewert, Joachim & Hanf, Jon H. & Schweichert, Erik, 2014. "Adaptation of South African Wine Cooperatives to Challenging Business Environments," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 42(2), pages 1-16.
    10. Agbo, Maxime & Rousselière, Damien & Salanié, Julien, 2015. "Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: A cooperative–non-cooperative game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 56-71.
    11. Fulton, Murray & Larson, Kathy A., 2009. "Overconfidence and Hubris: The Demise of Agricultural Co-operatives in Western Canada," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 37(2), pages 1-35.
    12. Valérie Barraud-Didier & Marie-Christine Henninger & Pierre Triboulet, 2014. "La Participation des Adhérents Dans Leurs Coopératives Agricoles: Une Étude Exploratoire du Secteur Céréalier Français," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 62(1), pages 125-148, March.
    13. Jasper Grashuis, 2018. "An Exploratory Study of Cooperative Survival: Strategic Adaptation to External Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Jing Yu & Sixian Li & Yaodong Zhou & Lingyu Song, 2025. "Mitigating the “Empty Shell” Phenomenon in Farmer Professional Cooperatives: Insights Based on Demonstration Cooperative Policies in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    15. Cynthia Giagnocavo & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez & Juan Carlos Pérez-Mesa, 2018. "Cooperative Longevity and Sustainable Development in a Family Farming System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    17. Zhi, Xiaoxu & Liu, Zongzhi & Yuan, Lingran & Shi, Xinjie & Huang, Biao & Gong, Binlei, 2025. "Rent-seeking cooperatives under information asymmetry: Evidence from agricultural subsidy policy in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Ramanauskas Julius & Stašys Rimantas & Contò Francesco, 2017. "The Main Obstacles and Possibilities of the Cooperative Movement in Lithuania," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 101-117, June.
    19. Mary Beckie & Emily Kennedy & Hannah Wittman, 2012. "Scaling up alternative food networks: farmers’ markets and the role of clustering in western Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(3), pages 333-345, September.
    20. Michael L. Cook, 2018. "A Life Cycle Explanation of Cooperative Longevity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ssaaea:113245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.