IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sieaea/338628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trends and support models in public expenditure on agriculture: An italian perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Briamonte, Lucia
  • Piatto, Paolo
  • Macaluso, Dario
  • Rubertucci, Mariagrazia

Abstract

This paper identifies, quantifies, and qualifies the streams and models of public expenditure in the agricultural sector for the 2010-2020 period, and attempts to respond to the main preliminary needs of interventions that benefit the agricultural sector.The specific methodology of the CREA has been used to classify public expenditure on agriculture at the national and regional levels, thus allowing for a homogeneous classification of all direct and indirect support for the sector, which has been obtained from the accounting records of the disbursing agencies.This is accompanied by the use of cluster analysis to identify the support models for the sector that have been adopted by the Italian regions.Through the analysis of FAO data on the Agriculture Orientation Index (AOI), national trends in spending are identified and compared with the European and global contexts, which also allows tracking of the evolution of the national agricultural policy independently of support from the Community Agricultural Policy (CAP).

Suggested Citation

  • Briamonte, Lucia & Piatto, Paolo & Macaluso, Dario & Rubertucci, Mariagrazia, 2023. "Trends and support models in public expenditure on agriculture: An italian perspective," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 25(2), October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sieaea:338628
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.338628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/338628/files/09_ECAGOA2-23_Briamonteetal.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.338628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam B. Jaffe, 2002. "Building Programme Evaluation into the Design of Public Research-Support Programmes," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 22-34, Spring.
    2. Ciliberti, Stefano & Frascarelli, Angelo, 2018. "The income effect of CAP subsidies: implications of distributional leakages for transfer efficiency in Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 7(2), August.
    3. Francesco Cont? & Piermichele La Sala & Paolo Papapietro & Mariantonietta Fiore, 2012. "Fiscalit? e agricoltura: nuovi strumenti per la competitivit? dei sistemi agroalimentari. Un modello di intervento in Basilicata," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 14(1), pages 273-294.
    4. Václav Bašek & Josef Kraus, 2011. "Comparison of selected indicators of farms in the EU member states," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 71-84.
    5. Irina Pilvere & Aleksejs Nipers & Aija Pilvere, 2022. "Evaluation of the European Green Deal Policy in the Context of Agricultural Support Payments in Latvia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Raju Jan Singh & Rene Weber, 1997. "The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: Can Anything be Learned from Swiss Data?," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 133(III), pages 617-634, September.
    7. Pierre‐Richard Agénor & Kyriakos C. Neanidis, 2011. "The Allocation Of Public Expenditure And Economic Growth," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(4), pages 899-931, July.
    8. M. Svatoš, 2008. "Selected trends forming European agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 93-101.
    9. Douglas Steinley & Michael J. Brusco, 2007. "Initializing K-means Batch Clustering: A Critical Evaluation of Several Techniques," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 24(1), pages 99-121, June.
    10. Juan Gonzalez Alegre, 2010. "Decentralization and the Composition of Public Expenditure in Spain," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1067-1083.
    11. Bingxin Yu & Shenggen Fan & Eduardo Magalhães, 2015. "Trends and Composition of Public Expenditures: A Global and Regional Perspective," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 27(3), pages 353-370, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucia Briamonte & Paolo Piatto & Dario Macaluso & Mariagrazia Rubertucci, 2023. "Trends and support models in public expenditure on agriculture: An italian perspective," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 25(2), pages 189-220.
    2. Dan Lupu & Mihai Bogdan Petrisor & Ana Bercu & Mihaela Tofan, 2018. "The Impact of Public Expenditures on Economic Growth: A Case Study of Central and Eastern European Countries," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 552-570, February.
    3. Pierre‐Richard Agénor, 2009. "Infrastructure Investment and Maintenance Expenditure: Optimal Allocation Rules in a Growing Economy," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 11(2), pages 233-250, April.
    4. Kryszak, Łukasz, 2020. "Income Convergence In The Agricultural Sector In The Context Of The European Union’S Common Agricultural Policy," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(3).
    5. Pierre Richard Agénor & Devrim Yilmaz, 2006. "The Tyranny of Rules: Fiscal Discipline, Productive Spending, and Growth," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0616, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    6. Jerzy Korzeniewski, 2016. "New Method Of Variable Selection For Binary Data Cluster Analysis," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 17(2), pages 295-304, June.
    7. Milanez Ana, 2020. "Workforce Ageing and Labour Productivity Dynamics," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 66(3), pages 1-13, September.
    8. E. Škorecová & M. Farkašová, 2008. "Variant calculation system - the instrument of economic performance management of a multifunctional agricultural enterprise," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 54(8), pages 376-383.
    9. Heshmati, Almas & Loof, Hans, 2005. "The Impact of Public Funds on Private R&D Investment: New Evidence from a Firm Level Innovation Study," Discussion Papers 11862, MTT Agrifood Research Finland.
    10. Agénor, Pierre-Richard, 2010. "A theory of infrastructure-led development," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 932-950, May.
    11. Jaud, Melise & Cadot, Olivier, 2012. "A second look at the pesticides initiative program: evidence from Senegal," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 490-506, July.
    12. Corsini, Alberto & Pezzoni, Michele, 2023. "Does grant funding foster research impact? Evidence from France," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    13. Bronwyn Hall & Alessandro Maffioli, 2008. "Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: evidence from Latin America," The European Journal of Development Research, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 172-198.
    14. Özçelik, Emre & Taymaz, Erol, 2008. "R&D support programs in developing countries: The Turkish experience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 258-275, March.
    15. Jerzy Korzeniewski, 2016. "New Method Of Variable Selection For Binary Data Cluster Analysis," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 17(2), pages 295-304, June.
    16. Takalo, Tuomas & Tanayama, Tanja & Toivanen, Otto, 2008. "Evaluating innovation policy: a structural treatment effect model of R&D subsidies," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 7/2008, Bank of Finland.
    17. Rhys Andrews & Malcolm J. Beynon, 2019. "Configurational Analysis of Access to Basic Infrastructure Services: Evidence from Turkish Provinces," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1341-1370, December.
    18. Sanz Labrador, Ismael & Sanz-Sanz, José Félix, 2013. "Política fiscal y crecimiento económico: consideraciones microeconómicas y relaciones macroeconómicas," Macroeconomía del Desarrollo 5367, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. World Bank, 2007. "Chile : Investment Climate Assessment, Volume 1. Executive Summary and Policy Recommendations," World Bank Publications - Reports 7695, The World Bank Group.
    20. Elena Toma & Paula Stoicea & Carina Dobre & Adina Iorga, 2023. "The Effect of Eco-Scheme Support on Romanian Farms—A Gini Index Decomposition by Income Source at Farm Level," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance; Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sieaea:338628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sieaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.