IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/remaae/12256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

American Agricultural Policy and the 1990 Farm Bill

Author

Listed:
  • Erdman, Laurie
  • Runge, C. Ford

Abstract

The United States (U.S.) government recently finished its five year ritual of farm legislation. In general, the 1990 Farm Bill, or the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990, extends most of the program features of its predecessor, the Food Security Act of 1985 (FSA). The recent bill continues a 57 year old tradition represented by loan rates, target prices, deficiency payments, base acres and yields, quotas, production controls, marketing loans, and other devices which support prices and income in return for retiring acres. However, the bill introduces several features that move it incrementally in the direction of "decoupling", and continues the trend set in 1985 of adding new environmental restrictions on farm practices. The recently passed Farm Bill was shaped by four forces; these forces will continue to shape U.S. farm policy throughout the 1990s. First, the rising budget deficit compelled Congressional agriculture committee members to decrease the cost of their programs. Second, a call for more open agricultural markets by the Bush Administration coupled with the budget constraint made smaller and more flexible crop acreage bases the most attractive way to achieve incremental decoupling. Third, recent scares of pesticides and agricultural chemicals on or in food and groundwater have led to rising concerns over the impact of agriculture on the environment. Fourth, the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations was an important consideration in drafting the first farm bill of the 1990s.

Suggested Citation

  • Erdman, Laurie & Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "American Agricultural Policy and the 1990 Farm Bill," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(02-03), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12256
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.12256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/12256/files/58020109.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.12256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taff, Steven J. & Runge, C. Ford, 1988. "Wanted: A Leaner and Meaner CRP," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-3.
    2. Creason, Jared R. & Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "Agricultural Competitiveness and Environmental Quality: What Mix of Policies Will Accomplish Both Goals?," Reports 50102, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    3. H. G. Brooks & S. Devadoss & W. H. Meyers, 1990. "The Impact of the U.S. Wheat Export Enhancement Program on the World Wheat Market," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 38(2), pages 253-277, July.
    4. Paarlberg, Robert L., 1990. "The Mysterious Popularity of EEP," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(2), pages 1-4.
    5. F. Gregory Hayden, 1990. "Wetlands Provisions in the 1985 and 1990 Farm Bills," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 575-587, June.
    6. Brooks, H. G. & Devadoss, Stephen & Meyers, William H., 1990. "Impact of the U.S. Wheat Export Enhancement Program on the World Wheat Market (The)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 305, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Kenneth C. Carraro & Cletus C. Coughlin, 1988. "The dubious success of export subsidies for wheat," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Nov, pages 38-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Runge, C. Ford & Vande Kamp, Philip R., 1992. "Agricultural Policy Developments in the United States: 1991-93," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 60(03), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Vande Kamp, Philip R. & Runge, C. Ford, 1994. "Trends and Developments in United States Agricultural Policy: 1993-1995," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(03), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann, 2015. "Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15889.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Runge, C. Ford, 1992. "Environmental Effects Of Trade In The Agricultural Sector: A Case Study," Working Papers 14449, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    2. Leetmaa, Susan E. & Krissoff, Barry & Hartmann, Monika, 1996. "Trade Policy And Environmental Quality: The Case Of Export Subsidies," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-9, October.
    3. Peterson, Jeffrey M. & Minten, Bart & de Gorter, Harry, 1999. "Economic Costs Of The U.S. Wheat Export Enhancement Program: Manna From Heaven Or From Taxpayers?," Working Papers 14578, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Giulia LISTORTI, 2008. "Price Transmission Mechanisms: a Policy Investigation of International Wheat Markets," Working Papers 318, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    5. Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg & Michael M. Knetter, 1997. "Causes and Consequences of the Export Enhancement Program for Wheat," NBER Chapters, in: The Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies, pages 273-296, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Ghoshray, Atanu, 2006. "Market Delineation and Price Leadership in the World Wheat Market: A Cointegration Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 35(2), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Lynch, Sarah, 1994. "Designing Green Support Programs," Policy Studies Program Reports, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, number 134111, March.
    8. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Debashis Chakraborty & Julien Chaisse, 2014. "Influence of Subsidies on Exports empirical estimates,policy evidences and regulatory prospects," Working Papers 1422, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.
    9. Young, C. Edwin & Osborn, C. Tim, 1990. "The Conservation Reserve Program: An Economic Assessment," Agricultural Economic Reports 308084, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Dobbs, Thomas L. & Becker, David L. & Taylor, Donald C., 1990. "Sustainable Agriculture Policy Analyses: South Dakota On-Farm Case Studies," Economics Staff Papers 232174, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Bruce Gardner, 1996. "The Political Economy of U.S. Export Subsidies for Wheat," NBER Chapters, in: The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, pages 291-334, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "Prospects For The Uruguay Round In Agriculture," Staff Papers 14094, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Harwood, Joy L. & Bailey, Kenneth W., 1990. "The World Wheat Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278264, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Batie, Sandra S., 1994. "Designing A Successful Voluntary Green Support Program: What Do We Know?," Staff Paper Series 11824, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    15. Runge, C. Ford & Stanton, Gretchen Heimpel, 1988. "L'Economie Politique Et Les Negociations D'Uruguay Vues De Geneve," Staff Papers 13519, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    16. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Houck, James P., 1989. "An Analysis of the Export Enhancement Program for Wheat," CNFAP Staff Reports 244129, Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI).
    17. Kozloff, Keith & Taff, Steven J., 1990. "Perspectives On Competitive Bidding: Retirement Of Environmentally Sensitive Farmland," Staff Papers 13822, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Wu, JunJie & Boggess, William G., 1999. "The Optimal Allocation of Conservation Funds," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 302-321, November.
    19. Patterson, Paul M. & Abbott, Philip C. & Stiegert, Kyle W., 1996. "The Export Enhancement Program'S Influence On Firm-Level Competition In International Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-12, July.
    20. Ellis, John R. & Chvilicek, Jerome & Roe, Dennis, 1989. "Targeting Highly Erodible Cropland for Retirement: A Program to Supplement the Conservation Reserve Program," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 244902, Western Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.