IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polpwa/266501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relational Premises in the Cooperation Between Farms with Conservative Breeds and Industry Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Domagalska-Grędys, Marta

Abstract

The main aim of the study was to indicate relational premises in the cooperation between industry organisations and farms with conservative breeds (cattle, pigs, and sheep). It has been assumed that the processes of integration of domestic animal breeders depend on the state of the relationships established (in terms of quality, sustainability, dependence and uniqueness) with industry organisations. The research was carried out on the basis of an interview questionnaire (in 2017) with farmers from south-eastern Poland, representatives of organisations, and a review of secondary sources describing the activities of industry organisations since the beginning of their existence. The specificity of the entities under analysis stems from their role and responsibilities. Breeders contribute to the growth of biodiversity, while industry organisations are an important partner in their relationships as they support farms (they mediate in the contracting process, organise trainings, represent the interests of producers in Poland and abroad). Preliminary results of the research indicate that the best conditions for cooperation are in the networks of breeders of conservative breeds of pigs as well as in interorganisational relationships with the ‘POLSUS’ industry organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Domagalska-Grędys, Marta, . "Relational Premises in the Cooperation Between Farms with Conservative Breeds and Industry Organisations," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 17(32, Part ).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:266501
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266501/files/2017_4_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266501/files/2017_4_5.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balakrishnan, Srinivasan & Koza, Mitchell P., 1993. "Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures : Theory and evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 99-117, January.
    2. Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika & Śpiewak, Ruta, 2015. "Organizacje rolnicze i ich wpływ na otoczenie – podejście teoretyczne z perspektywy socjologicznej i ekonomicznej," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(169).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shyam Kumar, M.V., 2007. "Asymmetric wealth gains in joint ventures: Theory and evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 19-27, March.
    2. Reddy, Kotapati Srinivasa, 2015. "Market for Corporate Control and Contractual Buyout (CoBO): A New “Collective Ownership-and-Administrative” Strategy," MPRA Paper 63937, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    3. Chen, Jun & King, Tao-Hsien Dolly & Wen, Min-Ming, 2015. "Do joint ventures and strategic alliances create value for bondholders?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 247-267.
    4. Cabaleiro, Goretti, 2019. "Sources of appropriation capacity in licensing agreements," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 48-61.
    5. Mantecon, Tomas, 2009. "Mitigating risks in cross-border acquisitions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 640-651, April.
    6. Hagedoorn, John & Sadowski, Bert, 1995. "Exploring the potential transition from strategic technology partnering to mergers and acquisitions," Research Memorandum 012, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. J. Amar & M. Arouri & G. Dufrénot & C. Lecourt, 2024. "Determinants of partial versus full cross-border acquisitions for Sovereign Wealth Funds," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 160(2), pages 509-539, May.
    8. Min Su, 2023. "Modelling sovereign credit ratings and assessing the impartiality: A case study of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-26, September.
    9. J. Bart Carrin & Yuko Harayama & J. Alexander K. Mack & Milad Zarin-Nejadan, 2004. "Science-Technology-Industry Network The Competitiveness of Swiss Biotechnology: A Case Study of Innovation," Discussion papers 04007, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    10. Tony W. Tong & Yong Li, 2011. "Real Options and Investment Mode: Evidence from Corporate Venture Capital and Acquisition," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 659-674, June.
    11. Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Zollo, Maurizio, 2005. "Termination outcomes of research alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 101-115, February.
    12. Guoliang Frank Jiang & Roberto Ragozzino, 2025. "International Corporate Development Activities and Information Disclosures in Earnings Calls," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 175-206, April.
    13. Nicolai J. Foss, 1999. "Capabilities, Confusion, and the Costs of Coordination On Some Problems in Recent Research On Inter-Firm Relations," DRUID Working Papers 99-7, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    14. Carmelo Intrisano & Anna Paola Micheli & Anna Maria Calce, 2021. "Financial Structure: A Comparative Study between European Listed and Unlisted Companies," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(11), pages 111-111, July.
    15. Retsef Levi & Georgia Perakis & Cong Shi & Wei Sun, 2020. "Strategic Capacity Planning Problems in Revenue‐Sharing Joint Ventures," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 664-687, March.
    16. Ilaria Galavotti & Daniele Cerrato & Franca Cantoni, 2020. "Surviving after Cross-Border Acquisitions: How Business Relatedness, Host Country Experience, and Cultural Distance Affect Acquired Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Romain Gandia & Elodie Gardet, 2019. "Sources of Dependence and Strategies to Innovate: Evidence from Video Game SMEs," Post-Print hal-01696250, HAL.
    18. Jeffrey J. Reuer & Tony W. Tong, 2010. "Discovering Valuable Growth Opportunities: An Analysis of Equity Alliances with IPO Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 202-215, February.
    19. repec:dgr:rugsom:04g06 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Roberto Ragozzino, 2009. "The Effects of Geographic Distance on the Foreign Acquisition Activity of U.S. Firms," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 509-535, September.
    21. Thomas Mellewigt & Adeline Thomas & Ingo Weller & Edward J. Zajac, 2017. "Alliance or Acquisition? A Mechanisms‐Based, Policy‐Capturing Analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(12), pages 2353-2369, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:266501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wesggpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.