IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/polpwa/195292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance and competitive advantage of the European Union countries in trade in agri-food products

Author

Listed:
  • Pawlak, Karolina

Abstract

The aim of the paper was to show the importance and competitive advantage of the EU countries in trade in agri-food products. It was proved that old member states of the EU, especially Holland, Germany and France, play a dominant role in the agri-food trade. Although agri-food products occupy an important position in the total trade structure of the Central and East European countries, their significance in the exchange of agri-food products in the Community is incomparably smaller.

Suggested Citation

  • Pawlak, Karolina, 2012. "Importance and competitive advantage of the European Union countries in trade in agri-food products," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 12(27), pages 1-8, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:195292
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.195292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/195292/files/2012_3_12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.195292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fagerberg, Jan, 1988. "International Competitiveness: Errata," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(393), pages 1203-1203, December.
    2. Singh, Ajit, 1977. "UK Industry and the World Economy: A Case of De-industrialisation?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(2), pages 113-136, June.
    3. Ema Duren & Larry Martin & Randall Westgren, 1991. "Assessing the Competitiveness of Canada's Agrifood Industry," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 39(4), pages 727-738, December.
    4. P. Lynn Kennedy & R. Wes Harrison & Nicholas G. Kalaitzandonakes & H. Christopher Peterson & Ronald P. Rindfuss, 1997. "Perspectives on evaluating competitiveness in agribusiness industries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(4), pages 385-392.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aneta Jarosz-Angowska & Marek Angowski & Magdalena Kakol & Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula, 2020. "Agricultural Competitive Potential and Competitive Position in the International Trade of Agricultural and Food Products in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 779-803.
    2. Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula & Artur Krukowski, 2020. "Competitiveness of Agriculture in New Member States of the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 160-175.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pazzini, Humberto Santiago & Viegas, Viviane Gorgati, 2006. "Análise E Fatores Condicionantes Do Desempenho Das Exportações Brasileiras De Banana No Período De 1990 A 2003," 44th Congress, July 23-27, 2006, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil 148646, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
    2. Pawlak, Karolina, . "Importance and Comparative Advantages of the EU and US Agri-food Sector in World Trade in 1995-2015," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 17(32, Part ).
    3. Ortmann, Gerald F., 2000. "Promoting competitiveness in South African agriculture and agribusiness: The role of institutions," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-33, March.
    4. Angela Cheptea & Lionel Fontagné & Soledad Zignago, 2014. "European export performance," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 150(1), pages 25-58, February.
    5. Carlin, Wendy & Glyn, Andrew & Van Reenen, John, 2001. "Export Market Performance of OECD Countries: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Cost Competitiveness," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(468), pages 128-162, January.
    6. Ramlawati Ramlawati & Aditya Halim Perdana Kusuma Putra, 2018. "Total Quality Management as the Key of the Company to Gain the Competitiveness, Performance Achievement and Consumer Satisfaction," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(5), pages 60-69.
    7. Harald Trabold, 1995. "Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einer Volkswirtschaft," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 64(2), pages 169-185.
    8. Alessandra Guariglia & Amelia U. Santos-Paulino, 2008. "Export Productivity, Finance, and Economic Growth: Are the Southern Engines of Growth Different?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-27, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Helen Louri & Ioanna Pepelasis Minoglou, 2001. "A Quantitative Exploration on the Determinants of (De-)Industrialisation: The case of Greece," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 397-410.
    10. Fabrizi, Andrea & Guarini, Giulio & Meliciani, Valentina, 2024. "The impact of environmental research networks on green exports: An analysis of a sample of European countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 143-154.
    11. Kennedy, P. Lynn & Rosson, C. Parr, III, 2002. "Impacts Of Globalization On Agricultural Competitiveness: The Case Of Nafta," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Cowan, Robin & Foray, Dominique, 1995. "Quandaries in the economics of dual technologies and spillovers from military to civilian research and development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 851-868, November.
    13. Robert Rowthorn & Ken Coutts, 2004. "De-industrialisation and the balance of payments in advanced economies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 28(5), pages 767-790, September.
    14. Lavopa, A., 2014. "Catching up and lagging behind in a balance-of-payments-constrained dual economy," MERIT Working Papers 2014-042, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Gordeev, Roman, 2020. "Comparative advantages of Russian forest products on the global market," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    16. Garcia Pires, Armando José, 2006. "International Trade with Competitiveness Effects in R&D," CEPR Discussion Papers 5547, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Cancelo, M.Teresa & Guisan, M.Carmen & Frias, Isidro, 2001. "Supply and Demand on Manufacturing Output in OECD countries: econometric models and specification test," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 1(2), pages 7-42.
    18. Ron Boschma & Simona Iammarino, 2009. "Related Variety, Trade Linkages, and Regional Growth in Italy," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(3), pages 289-311, July.
    19. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2017. "Global Dynamics, Capabilities and the Crisis," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 83-106, Springer.
    20. Vesna Stavrevska, 2011. "The efficiency wages perspective to wage rigidity in the open economy: a survey," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 273-299, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:polpwa:195292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wesggpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.