IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/360401.html

Appraising the administrative burden of USDA organic certification: A descriptive analysis of Notice of Noncompliance data

Author

Listed:
  • Carter, David
  • Adams, Ian
  • Wright, Seth
  • Scott, Tyler

Abstract

Many of the challenges organic producers and pro­cessors experience are caused by how organic standards compliance is monitored and enforced—in particular, the administrative procedures that are mandated to verify that operation practices meet organic certification requirements. In this policy analysis, we examine noncompliance documenta­tion and verification by accredited certifiers under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Lev­eraging a novel and unique compilation of “Notice of Noncompliance” letters issued to organic pro­ducers and processors, we find a preponderance of administrative violations, relative to substantive ones. We discuss how the finding may help explain contemporary transformations in the organic mar­ket, as larger agri-food entities’ capacity to absorb the administrative costs that frustrate smaller oper­ations may contribute to organic market “conven­tionalization” and consolidation.

Suggested Citation

  • Carter, David & Adams, Ian & Wright, Seth & Scott, Tyler, 2022. "Appraising the administrative burden of USDA organic certification: A descriptive analysis of Notice of Noncompliance data," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 11(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:360401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360401/files/1029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aravind, Deepa & Christmann, Petra, 2011. "Decoupling of Standard Implementation from Certification: Does Quality of ISO 14001 Implementation Affect Facilities’ Environmental Performance?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 73-102, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duran Gabela, Carlos F. & Sarasty, Oscar & Lamino Jaramillo, Pablo & Boren-Alpizar, Amy, 2023. "What are the attributes that actually catch our eye? A choice experiment to understand Latin American coffee & cocoa consumers' preferences," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335928, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kathryn Bowler & Pavel Castka & Michaela Balzarova, 2017. "Understanding Firms’ Approaches to Voluntary Certification: Evidence from Multiple Case Studies in FSC Certification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 441-456, October.
    2. Joel Bothello & Ioannis Ioannou & Vlad‐Andrei Porumb & Yasemin Zengin‐Karaibrahimoglu, 2023. "CSR decoupling within business groups and the risk of perceived greenwashing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3217-3251, December.
    3. Fabio La Rosa & Sergio Paternostro & Francesca Bernini, 2023. "Corporate and regional governance antecedents of the Legality Rating of private Italian companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 297-329, March.
    4. Ivan Montiel & Petra Christmann & Trevor Zink, 2019. "The Effect of Sustainability Standard Uncertainty on Certification Decisions of Firms in Emerging Economies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 667-681, February.
    5. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed, 2020. "Impact of environmental policy on firm's market performance: The case of ISO 14001," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 681-693, March.
    6. Yan, Jiayan & Cao, Zhangfan & Chen, Steven Xianglong & Deng, Ziliang, 2025. "The influence of environmental management system on outward foreign direct investment: Evidence from ISO 14001 certification in China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3).
    7. Anil R. Doshi & Glen W. S. Dowell & Michael W. Toffel, 2013. "How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(10), pages 1209-1231, October.
    8. Peter Seele & Lucia Gatti, 2017. "Greenwashing Revisited: In Search of a Typology and Accusation‐Based Definition Incorporating Legitimacy Strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 239-252, February.
    9. Laura Bravi & Gilberto Santos & Alessandro Pagano & Federica Murmura, 2020. "Environmental management system according to ISO 14001:2015 as a driver to sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2599-2614, November.
    10. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Saad Baloch & Nasrullah & Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, 2019. "Valuation of Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001: Evidence from an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Konstantinos Iatridis & Effie Kesidou, 2018. "What Drives Substantive Versus Symbolic Implementation of ISO 14001 in a Time of Economic Crisis? Insights from Greek Manufacturing Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(4), pages 859-877, April.
    12. Castka, Pavel & Prajogo, Daniel & Sohal, Amrik & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2015. "Understanding firms׳ selection of their ISO 9000 third-party certifiers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 125-133.
    13. Lijun Tang & Victor Gekara, 2020. "The Importance of Customer Expectations: An Analysis of CSR in Container Shipping," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 383-393, September.
    14. Yang, Minghui & Chen, Shaoming & Maresova, Petra, 2024. "Environmental corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: The role of environmental performance and ISO 14001," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    15. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Marie‐Christine Brotherton, 2018. "Corporate Biodiversity Management through Certifiable Standards," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 389-402, March.
    16. Sabina Scarpellini & Jesus Valero‐Gil & José M. Moneva & Michele Andreaus, 2020. "Environmental management capabilities for a “circular eco‐innovation”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1850-1864, July.
    17. Meng Tian & Chuan Hu & Wei Huang & Han Jiang, 2024. "Pressure or benefits? A multidimensional heterogeneity perspective on the role of environmental self-regulation in firms’ resource acquisition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 32253-32286, December.
    18. Fabien Martinez, 2021. "Ecological responsiveness and business performance: Four scenarios of compatibility and a multi‐faceted strategies framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3606-3625, December.
    19. Frances Bowen, 2019. "Marking Their Own Homework: The Pragmatic and Moral Legitimacy of Industry Self-Regulation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 257-272, April.
    20. Jose García-Quevedo & Effie Kesidou & Ester Martínez-Ros, 2018. "Inter-industry differences in organisational eco-innovation: a panel data study," Working Papers 2018/07, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:360401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.