IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13744-d1240087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Firms’ Pragmatic Legitimacy on Investors’ Perceptions of Their Environmental Protection Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Keigo Fujikura

    (School of Management, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan)

  • Akitsu Oe

    (School of Management, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan)

Abstract

This study demonstrates the mechanisms by which the pragmatic characteristics of legitimacy influence the promotion of corporate social responsibility activities, focusing on firms and investors. We hypothesize that the more aggressive a firm is in its environmental protection efforts, the higher the reduction in investment risk from its environmental performance. Multiple regression analysis was performed for Japanese chemical-related industries from 2017 to 2019. The results revealed that firms that balance environmental performance with business profits should invest in environmental protection activities and improve their environmental performance without touting profitability. The findings reveal the need to incorporate a profitability perspective when considering the relationship between environmental protection activities and investor perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Keigo Fujikura & Akitsu Oe, 2023. "The Influence of Firms’ Pragmatic Legitimacy on Investors’ Perceptions of Their Environmental Protection Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13744-:d:1240087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johannes Jahn & Rolf Brühl, 2018. "How Friedman’s View on Individual Freedom Relates to Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 41-52, November.
    2. Dong Yang Hao & Guo You Qi & Jing Wang, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Internal Controls, and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Chinese Stock Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Hakkon Kim & Kwangwoo Park, 2018. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility and the Cost of Capital: International Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 335-361, May.
    4. Rodolphe Durand & Luc Paugam & Hervé Stolowy, 2019. "Do investors actually value sustainability indices? Replication, development, and new evidence on CSR visibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(9), pages 1471-1490, September.
    5. Klarin Tomislav, 2018. "The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 21(1), pages 67-94, May.
    6. Ana Gabriela Ramirez & Julián Monsalve & Juan David González-Ruiz & Paula Almonacid & Alejandro Peña, 2022. "Relationship between the Cost of Capital and Environmental, Social, and Governance Scores: Evidence from Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Myers, Stewart C. & Majluf, Nicholas S., 1984. "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 187-221, June.
    8. James Cordeiro & Manish Tewari, 2015. "Firm Characteristics, Industry Context, and Investor Reactions to Environmental CSR: A Stakeholder Theory Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 833-849, September.
    9. Zeelenberg, M., 1999. "Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision-making," Other publications TiSEM 38371d1b-31fd-45b0-860f-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. William Dilla & Diane Janvrin & Jon Perkins & Robyn Raschke, 2019. "Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 476-497, June.
    11. Jongjin Sohn & Jongseon Lee & Nami Kim, 2020. "Going Green Inside and Out: Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Financial Performance under Regulatory Stringency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Yann Truong & Brian G. Nagy, 2021. "Nascent ventures’ green initiatives and angel investor judgments of legitimacy and funding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1801-1818, December.
    13. Sang Koo Kang & Hee Sub Byun, 2020. "Are Corporate Environmental Responsibility Activities an Efficient Investment or an Agency Cost? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Christian Dreyer & Nadja Guenster & Jakob Koegst, 2019. "Empirical Evidence on Environmental Performance and Operating Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Lamberti, Lucio & Lettieri, Emanuele, 2011. "Gaining legitimacy in converging industries: Evidence from the emerging market of functional food," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 462-475.
    16. Anne Michaels & Michael Grüning, 2017. "Relationship of corporate social responsibility disclosure on information asymmetry and the cost of capital," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 251-274, October.
    17. Jeong‐Bon Kim & Bing Li & Zhenbin Liu, 2018. "Does social performance influence breadth of ownership?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(9-10), pages 1164-1194, October.
    18. Mark P. Sharfman & Chitru S. Fernando, 2008. "Environmental risk management and the cost of capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 569-592, June.
    19. Jyoti Devi Mahadeo & Vanisha Oogarah-Hanuman & Teerooven Soobaroyen, 2011. "Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 158-175, September.
    20. WenZhi Zheng & Yichao Chen & Yufang Dai & Yenchun Jim Wu & Mengting Hu, 2022. "Why do good deeds go unnoticed? A perspective on the legitimacy Judgment of social entrepreneurship in China," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9-10), pages 788-806, October.
    21. Youngkyung Ok & Jungmu Kim, 2019. "Which Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Affects the Cost of Equity? Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    22. Hammad Riaz & Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Saad Baloch & Nasrullah & Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, 2019. "Valuation of Environmental Management Standard ISO 14001: Evidence from an Emerging Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    23. Jessica Lee Weber, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure level, external assurance and cost of equity capital," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(4), pages 694-724, December.
    24. Aravind, Deepa & Christmann, Petra, 2011. "Decoupling of Standard Implementation from Certification: Does Quality of ISO 14001 Implementation Affect Facilities’ Environmental Performance?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 73-102, January.
    25. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    26. William Dilla & Diane Janvrin & Jon Perkins & Robyn Raschke, 2019. "Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 476-497, June.
    27. Kai Quan Zhang & Hsing Hung Chen, 2017. "Environmental Performance and Financing Decisions Impact on Sustainable Financial Development of Chinese Environmental Protection Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    28. Eliwa, Yasser & Aboud, Ahmed & Saleh, Ahmed, 2021. "ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    29. Mahadeo, Jyoti Devi & Oogarah-Hanuman, Vanisha & Soobaroyen, Teerooven, 2011. "Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 158-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renato Garzón-Jiménez & Ana Zorio-Grima, 2021. "Effects of Carbon Emissions, Environmental Disclosures and CSR Assurance on Cost of Equity in Emerging Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Kim, Taeyeon & Kim, Hyun-Dong & Park, Kwangwoo, 2020. "CEO inside debt holdings and CSR activities," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 508-529.
    3. Massimo Mariani & Fabio Pizzutilo & Alessandra Caragnano & Marianna Zito, 2021. "Does it pay to be environmentally responsible? Investigating the effect on the weighted average cost of capital: Environmental commitment and the cost of capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1854-1869, November.
    4. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili, 2020. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure, Ownership Structure and Cost of Capital: Evidence from the UAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Metin Borak & Hatice Dogukanli, 2023. "Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Portfolio Performance: Evidence From Turkey," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    6. Hail Jung & Seyeong Song & Chang-Keun Song, 2021. "Carbon Emission Regulation, Green Boards, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Shihong Zeng & Yujia Qin & Guowang Zeng, 2019. "Impact of Corporate Environmental Responsibility on Investment Efficiency: The Moderating Roles of the Institutional Environment and Consumer Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Riccardo Rodella & Maria Rosa De Giacomo, 2023. "How do financial markets reward companies tackling climate change concerns? A natural experiment based on the Brexit referendum," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 979-990, March.
    9. Mio, Chiara & Fasan, Marco & Scarpa, Francesco, 2023. "Materiality investor perspectives on utilities’ ESG performance. An empirical analysis of ESG factors and cost of equity," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Bo-Hung Chiou & Shen-Ho Chang, 2020. "Influence of Investment Efficiency by Managers and Accounting Conservatism on Idiosyncratic Risks to Investors," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    12. Ourvashi Bissoon, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility in Mauritius: an analysis of annual reports of multinational hotel groups," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Sudi Sudarsanam & Ashraf A. Mahate, 2003. "Glamour Acquirers, Method of Payment and Post‐acquisition Performance: The UK Evidence," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1‐2), pages 299-342, January.
    14. Ravi Jagannathan & Iwan Meier, 2002. "Do We Need CAPM for Capital Budgeting?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 31(4), Winter.
    15. Kaouther Toumi Lajimi & Rana El Bahsh & Serge Agbodjo, 2017. "The determinants of bank profitability, does Islamic ethics perspective matter ? A comprehensive study on Islamic banks vs. Conventional ones," Post-Print hal-04109833, HAL.
    16. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    17. Soobaroyen, Teerooven & Ntim, Collins G., 2013. "Social and environmental accounting as symbolic and substantive means of legitimation: The case of HIV/AIDS reporting in South Africa," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 92-109.
    18. Monda, Barbara & Giorgino, Marco & Modolin, Ileana, 2013. "Rationales for Corporate Risk Management - A Critical Literature Review," MPRA Paper 45420, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Lindner, Thomas & Muellner, Jakob & Puck, Jonas, 2016. "Cost of Capital in an International Context: Institutional Distance, Quality, and Dynamics," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 234-248.
    20. Trinks, Arjan & Ibikunle, Gbenga & Mulder, Machiel & Scholtens, Bert, 2017. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity and the Cost of Capital," Research Report 17017-EEF, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13744-:d:1240087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.