IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Forage Response to Swine Effluent: A Cox Nonnested Test of Alternative Functional Forms Using a Fast Double Bootstrap

  • Park, Seong Cheol
  • Brorsen, B. Wade
  • Stoecker, Arthur L.
  • Hattey, Jeffory A.

ACox nonnested test is conducted using a fast double bootstrap (FDB) method to select among three competing functional forms (linear response plateau, quadratic, and Mitscherlich-Baule) to model forage yield response to nitrogen applied with swine effluent. The quadratic is rejected in favor of one of the other functional forms in all cases. The FDB p values differed slightly from the single bootstrap p values. Buffalograss was slightly more profitable than bermudagrass and has the ability to use almost as much nitrogen as bermudagrass.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/137118
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Southern Agricultural Economics Association in its journal Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

Volume (Year): 44 (2012)
Issue (Month): 04 (November)
Pages:

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:137118
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.saea.org/jaae/jaae.htm

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. David Letson & B.D. McCullough, 1998. "Better Confidence Intervals: The Double Bootstrap with No Pivot," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(3), pages 552-559.
  2. Kaitibie, Simeon & Epplin, Francis M. & Brorsen, B. Wade & Horn, Gerald W. & Krenzer, Eugene G., Jr. & Paisley, Steven I., 2003. "Optimal Stocking Density for Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(01), April.
  3. Gelson Tembo & B. Wade Brorsen & Francis M. Epplin & Em�lio Tost�o, 2008. "Crop Input Response Functions with Stochastic Plateaus," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(2), pages 424-434.
  4. Tumusiime, Emmanuel & Brorsen, B. Wade & Biermacher, Jon T. & Mosali, Jagadeesh & Johnson, Jim & Locke, James, 2010. "Determining Optimal Levels of Nitrogen Fertilizer Using Random Parameter Models," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56514, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  5. Carreira, Rita I. & Stoecker, Arthur L. & Epplin, Francis M. & Hattey, Jeffory A. & Kizer, Michael A., 2006. "Subsurface Drip Irrigation Versus Center-Pivot Sprinkler for Applying Swine Effluent to Corn," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(03), December.
  6. N. Coulibaly & B. Wade Brorsen, 1999. "Monte carlo sampling approach to testing nonnested hypothesis: monte carlo results," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 195-209.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:137118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.