IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gjagec/145294.html

Coordination and Differentiation of Strategies: The Impact on Farm Growth of Strategic Interaction on the Rental Market for Land

Author

Listed:
  • Margarian, Anne

Abstract

differences in farm-development strategies can be observed. The land market has been identified in the literature as crucial for farm growth. In various studies, developments are driven by assumptions about the effects of scale and the initial heterogeneity of farms. In contrast, the present paper focuses on the potential role of opportunistic and future behaviour for the development of different farm strategies. In order to demonstrate the potentially crucial role of strategic behaviour, we introduce a thought experiment and focus on the theoretical case of identical farms. In the light of ideas from theories about oligopolistic markets, two central problems of decisionmaking are identified: the coordination problem of farm exits and the problem of strategic choices made by the remaining farms. This paper supplements explanations that argue on the basis of farms’ heterogeneity in that it offers an approach to the question of why farms might not overcome their short-term constraints in order to realise strategic advantages in competition. Regionale Unterschiede in den Betriebsentwicklungsstrategien der landwirtschaftlichen Familienbetriebe der westlichen Bundesländer Deutschlands sind beobachtbar. Der Bodenmarkt wurde in der Literatur als zentraler Faktor für das Wachstum landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe identifiziert. Normalerweise wird die Entwicklung in entsprechenden Studien durch Annahmen über Skaleneffekte und die anfängliche Heterogenität der Betriebe bestimmt. Im Gegensatz dazu steht im vorliegenden Papier die Rolle zukunftsgerichteten und opportunistischen Verhaltens für die Entwicklung unterschiedlicher Betriebsstrategien im Vordergrund. Um die möglicherweise zentrale Rolle strategischen Verhaltens zu verdeutlichen, wird in einem Gedankenexperiment der theoretische Grenzfall identischer Betriebe untersucht. Im Lichte von Ideen aus Theorien zum oligopolistischen Wettbewerb werden so zwei zentrale Entscheidungsprobleme ausgemacht: Das Koordinierungsproblem der Betriebsaufgabe und das Problem der Strategiewahl der verbleibenden Betriebe. Der Beitrag ergänzt die Erklärungen, die von betrieblicher Heterogenität ausgehen, indem ein Erklärungsansatz dafür angeboten wird, warum Betriebe nicht ihre kurzfristigen Restriktionen überwinden, um sich so einen strategischen Vorteil im Wettbewerb zu sichern.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarian, Anne, 2010. "Coordination and Differentiation of Strategies: The Impact on Farm Growth of Strategic Interaction on the Rental Market for Land," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(03), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:145294
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.145294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/145294/files/7_Margarian.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.145294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bergstrom, Theodore C & Stark, Oded, 1993. "How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 149-155, May.
    2. Michael Boehlje, 1992. "Alternative models of structural change in agriculture and related industries," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(3), pages 219-231.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Seifert & Christoph Kahle & Silke Hüttel, 2021. "Price Dispersion in Farmland Markets: What Is the Role of Asymmetric Information?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(4), pages 1545-1568, August.
    2. Hüttel, S. & Wildermann, L., . "Price formation in agricultural land markets – how do different acquiring parties and sellers matter?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50.
    3. Uehleke, Reinhard & Petrick, Martin & Hüttel, Silke, 2022. "Evaluations of agri-environmental schemes based on observational farm data: The importance of covariate selection," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Seidel, Claudia & Shang, Linmei & Britz, Wolfgang, "undated". "A critical assessment of neural networks as meta-model of a farm optimization model," Discussion Papers 338200, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margarian, Anne, 2010. "Coordination and Differentiation of Strategies: The Impact on Farm Growth of Strategic Interaction on the Rental Market for Land," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 59(3).
    2. Kai A. Konrad, 2004. "Altruism and envy in contests: An evolutionarily stable symbiosis," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 22(3), pages 479-490, June.
    3. Stark, Oded & Jakubek, Marcin, 2011. "Is population growth conducive to the sustainability of cooperation?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 443-451.
    4. Ivan Hilliard, 2013. "Responsible Management, Incentive Systems, and Productivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 365-377, December.
    5. Ted Bergstrom, 2001. "The Algebra of Assortativity and the Evolution of Cooperation," Game Theory and Information 0106002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Štefan Bojnec & Kristina Knific, 2021. "Farm Household Income Diversification as a Survival Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Bergstrom, Theodore C & Stark, Oded, 1993. "How Altruism Can Prevail in an Evolutionary Environment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 149-155, May.
    8. Thiermann, Insa & Schroeer, Daniel & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2022. "Are German farmers ready for ‘warm restructuring’ of the pig sector?," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321201, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    9. Oded Stark, 1996. "Frontier Issues in International Migration," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 19(1-2), pages 147-177, April.
    10. Gillespie, Jeffrey M. & Davis, Christopher G. & Rahelizatovo, Noro C., 2004. "An Evaluation of U.S. Hog Producer Preferences Toward Autonomy," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(3), pages 575-590, December.
    11. Bergstrom, Theodore C, 1995. "On the Evolution of Altruistic Ethical Rules for Siblings," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(1), pages 58-81, March.
    12. Boehlje, Michael & Doehring, Todd & Sonka, Steven T., 2005. "Farmers of the Future: Market Segmentation and Buying Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17.
    13. Jacques Rojot, 2002. "Economics and Management Theory: New Developments in France," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 283-294.
    14. Vittorio Pelligra, 2013. "Trust," Chapters, in: Luigino Bruni & Stefano Zamagni (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Reciprocity and Social Enterprise, chapter 40, pages 411-420, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Eigner, Amanda E. & Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2019. "Applied spatial approach of modelling field size changes based on a consideration of farm and landscape interrelations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Sherrill Shaffer, 2006. "Contests with interdependent preferences," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(13), pages 877-880.
    17. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Alexander Peterhansl & Peter S. Dodds & Duncan J. Watts, 2007. "Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(7), pages 1036-1050, July.
    18. Sung-Hoon Park & Jeong-Yoo Kim, 2022. "Evolutionary stability of preferences: altruism, selfishness, and envy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(2), pages 349-363, February.
    19. Jay Simon & Donald Saari & Donald Saari, 2020. "Interdependent Altruistic Preference Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 189-207, September.
    20. Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Peeters, Ronald & Tenev, Anastas P. & Thuijsman, Frank, 2021. "Naïve imitation and partial cooperation in a local public goods model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 162-185.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:145294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.