IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/earnsa/344093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of instruments for modeling economic and commercial behavior in bovine production

Author

Listed:
  • Ghiglione, Franco Alexis
  • Ferro Moreno, Santiago

Abstract

[EN] Agricultural companies base their decisions on the anticipated behavior of variables. This paper aims to analyze and model the behavior of livestock producers in relation to the adoption of marketing strategies in uncertain scenarios. Through structured questionnaires administered to cattle producers, stated preference models were developed for various strata, taking into account the number of animals. An inverse relationship was observed between income, derived from higher cattle stocks, and hypothetical and real choices of the direct marketing channel. Among the conventional variables, it was confirmed that beef cattle producers prioritize harvesting time over selling price and marketing cost. [ES] Las empresas agropecuarias basan sus decisiones en variables anticipadas. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar y modelar el comportamiento de los productores de ganado en relación con la adopción de estrategias de comercialización en escenarios inciertos Mediante cuestionarios estructurados, se desarrollaron modelos de preferencias declaradas para diversos estratos según el número de animales. Se observó una relación inversa entre ingresos, derivados de mayores existencias de ganado, y elecciones de canal de comercialización directa. Entre las variables convencionales, los productores de ganado de carne priorizan el tiempo de recolección sobre el precio de venta y el costo de comercialización.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghiglione, Franco Alexis & Ferro Moreno, Santiago, 2024. "Design of instruments for modeling economic and commercial behavior in bovine production," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 24(01), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:344093
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344093/files/Cap3-EARN_2024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily Lancsar & Denzil G. Fiebig & Arne Risa Hole, 2017. "Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 697-716, July.
    2. Bronnmann, Julia & Asche, Frank, 2017. "Sustainable Seafood From Aquaculture and Wild Fisheries: Insights From a Discrete Choice Experiment in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 113-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ingrid van Putten & Catherine Longo & Ashleigh Arton & Matt Watson & Christopher M Anderson & Amber Himes-Cornell & Clara Obregón & Lucy Robinson & Tatiana van Steveninck, 2020. "Shifting focus: The impacts of sustainable seafood certification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Filiptseva, Anna & Filler, Günther & Odening, Martin, 2022. "Compensation Options for Quarantine Costs in Plant Production," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329595, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Mang, Clarissa & Castro, Silvia, 2023. "Breaking the Silence," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277639, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Bernadette M. Clarke & Emma McKinley & Rhoda C. Ballinger, 2025. "UK Public Attitudes and Perceptions of Seafood Sustainability: A Case Study of the Marine Conservation Society’s Good Fish Guide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-32, January.
    5. Non, Arjan & Rohde, Ingrid & de Grip, Andries & Dohmen, Thomas, 2022. "Mission of the company, prosocial attitudes and job preferences: A discrete choice experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Olujide Arije & Jason Madan & Tintswalo Hlungwani, 2024. "Preferences in adolescents and young people’s sexual and reproductive health services in Nigeria: a discrete choice experiment," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Buchholz, Matthias & Danne, Michael & Musshoff, Oliver, 2022. "An experimental analysis of German farmers’ decisions to buy or rent farmland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Lancsar, Emily & Gu, Yuanyuan & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte & Butler, Jim & Ratcliffe, Julie & Bulfone, Liliana & Donaldson, Cam, 2020. "The relative value of different QALY types," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Nordmeyer, Eike Florenz & Danne, Michael & Musshoff, Oliver, 2023. "Can satellite-retrieved data increase farmers' willingness to insure against drought? – Insights from Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    10. Andreoni, Antonio & van Huellen, Sophie & Katera, Lucas & Jahari, Cornel, 2024. "How to overcome rent seeking in Tanzania’s skills sector? Exploring feasible reforms through discrete choice experiments," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Chen, Gang & Ratcliffe, Julie & Milte, Rachel & Khadka, Jyoti & Kaambwa, Billingsley, 2021. "Quality of care experience in aged care: An Australia-Wide discrete choice experiment to elicit preference weights," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    12. Jackson, Elizabeth, 2019. "Sustainability in Australian seafood supply chains: identifying the gap between theory and practice," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345860, International Farm Management Association.
    13. Bougherara, Douadia & Lapierre, Margaux & Préget, Raphaële & Sauquet, Alexandre, 2021. "Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-environmental schemes?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato, 2019. "Analysis of the Factors that Influence Olive Oil Demand in the Veneto Region (Italy)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Dunsch, Felipe Alexander & Velenyi, Edit, 2019. "Job Preferences of Frontline Health Workers in Ghana - A Discrete Choice Experiment," SocArXiv bqx5k, Center for Open Science.
    16. Wehner, Caroline & de Grip, Andries & Pfeifer, Harald, 2022. "Do recruiters select workers with different personality traits for different tasks? A discrete choice experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Khong, Tien Dung & Young, Michael D. & Loch, Adam & Thennakoon, Jayanthi, 2018. "Mekong River Delta farm-household willingness to pay for salinity intrusion risk reduction," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 80-89.
    18. Fang, Yingkai & Asche, Frank & Gao, Zhifeng, 2020. "Can ecolabel certifications for restaurants influence consumer choices away from home?," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304268, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Galárraga, Omar & Kuo, Caroline & Mtukushe, Bulelwa & Maughan-Brown, Brendan & Harrison, Abigail & Hoare, Jackie, 2020. "iSAY (incentives for South African youth): Stated preferences of young people living with HIV," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    20. Blake, Miranda R. & Lancsar, Emily & Peeters, Anna & Backholer, Kathryn, 2019. "Sugar-sweetened beverage price elasticities in a hypothetical convenience store," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 98-107.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:344093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.