Reducing Transaction Costs by Regulating Canada's Organic Industry
The regulation of Canadaâ€™s organic industry has been discussed for over a decade. Under the current voluntary system, organic producers and handlers are not required to obtain organic certification. Certifiers, in turn, are not required to obtain accreditation to Canadaâ€™s voluntary national organic standard. Participation in Canadaâ€™s national standard is low because certifiers feel that accreditation to the standard is too costly and does not provide access for their clients to foreign markets. At the same time, the federal government is having difficulty establishing equivalency agreements to enhance market access for Canadian organic products because participation in the national standard is low. This Catch-22 situation has meant that there is no minimum Canadian organic standard in place. The resultant proliferation of multiple regional certification standards results in high transaction costs for buyers and sellers of organic products (in both domestic and foreign markets), who must verify organic authenticity by evaluating regional standards on a case-by-case basis. Using a transaction cost framework, this paper examines the implications of regulating the Canadian organic industry through the creation of a mandatory minimum organic standard.
Volume (Year): (2006)
Issue (Month): 07 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://caes.usask.ca/papers/cafri/index.php|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Barzel, Yoram, 1982. "Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 25(1), pages 27-48, April.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cafric:46373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.