IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/cafric/46373.html

Reducing Transaction Costs by Regulating Canada's Organic Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Weseen, Simon

Abstract

The regulation of Canada’s organic industry has been discussed for over a decade. Under the current voluntary system, organic producers and handlers are not required to obtain organic certification. Certifiers, in turn, are not required to obtain accreditation to Canada’s voluntary national organic standard. Participation in Canada’s national standard is low because certifiers feel that accreditation to the standard is too costly and does not provide access for their clients to foreign markets. At the same time, the federal government is having difficulty establishing equivalency agreements to enhance market access for Canadian organic products because participation in the national standard is low. This Catch-22 situation has meant that there is no minimum Canadian organic standard in place. The resultant proliferation of multiple regional certification standards results in high transaction costs for buyers and sellers of organic products (in both domestic and foreign markets), who must verify organic authenticity by evaluating regional standards on a case-by-case basis. Using a transaction cost framework, this paper examines the implications of regulating the Canadian organic industry through the creation of a mandatory minimum organic standard.

Suggested Citation

  • Weseen, Simon, . "Reducing Transaction Costs by Regulating Canada's Organic Industry," CAFRI: Current Agriculture, Food and Resource Issues, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society, issue 7, pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cafric:46373
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.46373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/46373/files/weseen7-1_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.46373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoram Barzel, 1997. "Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets," Chapters, in: Svetozar Pejovich (ed.), The Economic Foundations of Property Rights, chapter 13, pages 171-192, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sawyer, Erin N. & Kerr, William A. & Hobbs, Jill E., 2008. "Consumer preferences and the international harmonization of organic standards," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 607-615, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benito Arruñada, 2017. "How to Make Land Titling more Rational," Working Papers 983, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Glachant, Jean-Michel & Pignon, Virginie, 2005. "Nordic congestion's arrangement as a model for Europe? Physical constraints vs. economic incentives," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 153-162, June.
    3. Eric C. Edwards & Martin Fiszbein & Gary D. Libecap, 2022. "Property Rights to Land and Agricultural Organization: An Argentina–United States Comparison," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(S1), pages 1-33.
    4. Gerard Marty & Raphaele Preget, 2007. "A Socio-economic Analysis of French Public Timber Sales," Working Papers - Cahiers du LEF 2007-03, Laboratoire d'Economie Forestiere, AgroParisTech-INRA.
    5. Van Der Merwe, M. & Kirsten, J. & Trienekens, J., 2018. "Aligning enforcement and governance mechanisms to protect and govern food products with a protected designation of origin," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277232, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Haucap, Justus, 2017. "The rule of law and the emergence of market exchange: A new institutional economic perspective," DICE Discussion Papers 276, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    7. Armelle Mazé & Claude Ménard, 2010. "Private ordering, collective action, and the self-enforcing range of contracts," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 131-153, February.
    8. Torsten Steinrücken & Sebastian Jaenichen, 2007. "The Fair Trade Idea: Towards an Economics of Social Labels," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 201-217, September.
    9. Thomas Mellewigt & Glenn Hoetker & Martina Lütkewitte, 2018. "Avoiding High Opportunism Is Easy, Achieving Low Opportunism Is Not: A QCA Study on Curbing Opportunism in Buyer–Supplier Relationships," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1208-1208, December.
    10. Annie Royer, 2008. "The Emergence of Agricultural Marketing Boards Revisited: A Case Study in Canada," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 509-522, December.
    11. Sadao Nagaoka & Akira Takeishi & Yoshihisa Noro, 2008. "Determinants of Firm Boundaries: Empirical Analysis of the Japanese Auto Industry from 1984 to 2002," NBER Chapters, in: Organizational Innovation and Firm Performance, pages 187-206, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Aubert, M. & Bouhsina, Z. & Codron, J.M. & Rousset, S., 2013. "Pesticide safety risk, food chain organization, and the adoption of sustainable farming practices. The case of Moroccan early tomatoes," Working Papers MoISA 201304, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    13. Clasen, Michael, 2004. "Success Factors of Digital Markets in the Agricultural and Food Industry," 2004 Conference (48th), February 11-13, 2004, Melbourne, Australia 58394, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Bigelow, Lyda S. & Argyres, Nicholas, 2008. "Transaction costs, industry experience and make-or-buy decisions in the population of early U.S. auto firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 66(3-4), pages 791-807, June.
    15. Jérôme Barthélemy & Dominique Geyer, 2005. "An empirical investigation of IT outsourcing vs. quasi-outsourcing in France and Germany," Post-Print hal-00764228, HAL.
    16. Hendrikse, G.W.J. & Veerman, C.P., 1995. "Marketing Cooperatives and Financial Structure," Other publications TiSEM 27831493-dd36-42ee-b74d-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Chong Choi & Tarek Eldomiaty & Sae Kim, 2007. "Consumer Trust, Social Marketing and Ethics of Welfare Exchange," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 17-23, August.
    18. Caleb S. Fuller, 2019. "Is the market for digital privacy a failure?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 353-381, September.
    19. Agham C. Cuevas, 2014. "Transaction Costs of Exchange in Agriculture: A Survey," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 11(1), pages 21-38, June.
    20. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2011. "Appropriation, violent enforcement, and transaction costs: a critical survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 227-253, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cafric:46373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.