IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to pay for a new biopesticide to control mango fruit flies

Author

Listed:
  • Tassembédo, Boureima
  • Ouédraogo, Mathieu
  • Nébié, Karim
  • Sinzogan, Antonio Alain Coffi
  • Toé, Patrice

Abstract

Purpose. This study aimed to examine the willingness to pay (WTP) of mango farmers for a new biopesticide to control fruit flies in western Burkina Faso. Methodology / approach. This study is based on the example of mango farmers in Western Burkina Faso, which is the largest mango-producing area in the country. This research used a multistage sampling technique, the first of which involved selecting two regions where mango production is predominant and where late varieties are highly susceptible to fruit fly attack. In the second stage, three provinces were reasonably selected: Kénédougou, Comoé, and Houet in the west of the country. To achieve this goal, a cross-sectional data were gathered from a sample of 341 mango growers. The contingent valuation method was applied and the Cragg Double-Hurdle model was used for analysis. Furthermore, primary data was obtained from respondents through interviews, and secondary data was obtained from relevant agencies. Results. The results indicate that 81.52 % of growers are willing to pay an average of FCFA 2,745 and 70.38 % of them proposed an average amount to be paid of FCFA 2,851 for a weekly treatment with the new biopesticide. Education, access to advisory services, knowledge of fruit flies, and organic production methods influence both growers’ decision to pay and the value of their WTP. Additionally, the willingness to pay for the new biopesticide is positively influenced by the farming area and the perception of the detrimental effects of chemical pesticides on human health and the environment, while the decision to adopt is positively influenced by the income generated from the production of mangos. Knowledge of WTP and its determinants will make it possible to put in place appropriate and effective mechanisms for disseminating information on the new biopesticides to improve fruit fly control and, in turn, farmers’ production and income. Originality / scientific novelty. Despite the threat posed by fruit flies to the mango industry, no studies in Burkina Faso have examined the willingness to pay for methods to control these pests. The novelty of this research is in its application of the Cragg Double-Hurdle analytical model in an ex-ante setting for a new biopesticide. This is the first time that the price farmers are willing to pay for a new fruit fly control method and the factors that determine its use have been scientifically assessed before it is introduced to the market in Burkina Faso. Policymakers and other stakeholders will be able to use the analytical results to promote the new biopesticide for widespread use, as opposed to conventional control approaches. Practical value / implications. To effectively control fruit flies, it is necessary for decision makers to work closely with the private sector to make the yeast waste-based biopesticide for fruit fly control affordable by creating incentives for its multiplication and distribution. Extension services should also be involved in promoting this technology to growers. Finally, awareness-raising campaigns for growers on fruit fly damage and the biopesticide for successful collective control should be stepped up.

Suggested Citation

  • Tassembédo, Boureima & Ouédraogo, Mathieu & Nébié, Karim & Sinzogan, Antonio Alain Coffi & Toé, Patrice, 2024. "Willingness to pay for a new biopesticide to control mango fruit flies," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355997
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355997/files/7_Tassemb%D0%B5do_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coelli, Tim & Fleming, Euan, 2004. "Diversification economies and specialisation efficiencies in a mixed food and coffee smallholder farming system in Papua New Guinea," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 229-239, December.
    2. Gideon Danso-Abbeam & Gilbert Dagunga & Dennis Sedem Ehiakpor, 2019. "Adoption of Zai technology for soil fertility management: evidence from Upper East region, Ghana," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. repec:icf:icfjag:v:07:y:2010:i:4:p:17-32 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Solís & Boris E. Bravo‐Ureta & Ricardo E. Quiroga, 2009. "Technical Efficiency among Peasant Farmers Participating in Natural Resource Management Programmes in Central America," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 202-219, February.
    2. Markose Chekol Zewdie & Michele Moretti & Daregot Berihun Tenessa & Zemen Ayalew Ayele & Jan Nyssen & Enyew Adgo Tsegaye & Amare Sewnet Minale & Steven Van Passel, 2021. "Agricultural Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Raissa Sorgho & Isabel Mank & Moubassira Kagoné & Aurélia Souares & Ina Danquah & Rainer Sauerborn, 2020. "“We Will Always Ask Ourselves the Question of How to Feed the Family”: Subsistence Farmers’ Perceptions on Adaptation to Climate Change in Burkina Faso," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Bachewe, Fantu Nisrane & Koru, Bethlehem & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum, 2018. "Productivity and efficiency in high-potential areas," IFPRI book chapters, in: The economics of teff: Exploring Ethiopia’s biggest cash crop, chapter 7, pages 149-180, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Wollni, Meike & Brümmer, Bernhard, 2012. "Productive efficiency of specialty and conventional coffee farmers in Costa Rica: Accounting for technological heterogeneity and self-selection," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 67-76.
    6. Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Hatzenbuehler, Patrick L. & Edeh, Hyacinth O., 2020. "Effects of agricultural mechanization on economies of scope in crop production in Nigeria," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    7. Yang, Dan & Liu, Zimin, 2012. "Does farmer economic organization and agricultural specialization improve rural income? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 990-993.
    8. Mekhora, Thamrong & Fleming, Euan M., 2004. "An Analysis of Scope Economies and Specialisation Efficiencies Among Thai Shrimp and Rice Smallholders," Working Papers 12914, University of New England, School of Economics.
    9. Singbo, Alphonse G. & Emvalomatis, Grigorios & Alfons, Oude Lansink, 2013. "Assessing the impact of crop specialization on farms’ performance in vegetables farming in Benin: a non-neutral stochastic frontier approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149172, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Kibrom A. Abay & Tesfamicheal Wossen & Jordan Chamberlin, 2023. "Mismeasurement and efficiency estimates: Evidence from smallholder survey data in Africa," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 413-434, June.
    11. Ioannis Skevas & Grigorios Emvalomatis & Bernhard Brümmer, 2018. "The effect of farm characteristics on the persistence of technical inefficiency: a case study in German dairy farming," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(1), pages 3-25.
    12. Urbina, Jilber, 2017. "Eficiencia técnica en la producción de café en Nicaragua: Un análisis de fronteras estocásticas [Technical efficiency in coffee production: a stochastic frontier analysis for Nicaragua]," MPRA Paper 82690, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2017.
    13. Sanzidur Rahman & Basanta Kumar Barmon, 2018. "Total Factor Energy Productivity and Efficiency Changes of the Gher (Prawn-Carp-Rice) Farming System in Bangladesh: A Stochastic Input Distance Function Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Latruffe, Laure & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Moreira, Victor H. & Desjeux, Yann & Dupraz, Pierre, 2011. "Productivity and Subsidies in European Union Countries: An Analysis for Dairy Farms Using Input Distance Frontiers," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114396, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Md. Sadique Rahman & Monoj Kumar Majumder, 2021. "Drivers of adoption and impacts of an eco-friendly agricultural technology in Bangladesh," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Siyan Zeng & Fengwu Zhu & Fu Chen & Man Yu & Shaoliang Zhang & Yongjun Yang, 2018. "Assessing the Impacts of Land Consolidation on Agricultural Technical Efficiency of Producers: A Survey from Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Jorge Andrés Perdomo & Darrell Hueth, 2010. "Funciones de producción y eficiencia técnica en el eje cafetero colombiano: una aproximación con frontera estocástica," Documentos CEDE 7606, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    18. Yatribi Taoufik, 2020. "Factors Affecting Precision Agriculture Adoption: A Systematic Litterature Review," Economics, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 103-121, December.
    19. Fleming, Euan M. & Fleming, Pauline, 2006. "A Reappraisal of the Role of Agriculture in Economic Growth in Melanesian Countries," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25715, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Wirat Krasachat, 2023. "The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.