IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/313636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlling, monitoring and diagnostics in identifying effective management practices of agricultural enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Fedicheva, Krystyna
  • Kochetkov, Oleksii
  • Honcharenko, Stanislav
  • Levkina, Ruslana
  • Bichevin, Maksym

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study – taking into account the functional load of the system of controlling, monitoring and diagnostics, to determine a methodical approach to performance control in the process of monitoring production parameters of agricultural enterprises’ functioning and diagnosing problematic aspects of financial and economic results to justify management decisions when planning promising production programs. Methodology / approach. Studies were conducted on the basis of general scientific methods (in the study of the theoretical basis of the functions of controlling, monitoring, and diagnostics of management activities in ensuring the effectiveness of management decisions in planning the sown areas structure), abstract-logical (to generalize the influence features of intensive crops use degree on the effectiveness of the grain direction of agricultural enterprises), economic and mathematical (to identify the optimal strategy in terms of information uncertainty in the agricultural enterprise management associated with the presence of faintly structured problems), statistical methods (statistical solutions theories for modeling the mechanism of crops interaction in given conditions of natural resources), and constructive (determining the method of substantiation of optimal resources flows and results of activities in order to maximize the profitability in the condition of the constancy of the resource base). The methodological basis in processing material is the dialectical method of social and economic phenomena perception. Results. In the course of the research, the conditions of formation of effective system of agriculture entities and diagnostics prerequisites of possible management actions to ensure sustainable profitability were analyzed. It is established that a critical increase in the sunflower share in crops is a reactive behavior of management practice in the conditions of the Luhansk region. The dependence of management decisions on planning the structure of sown areas by the perception of favorable economic conditions is proved according to the diagnostic analysis. The main parameters of statistical modeling for the implementation of diagnostic functions for identifying probable management actions in ensuring sustainable profitability of enterprises are determined. Originality / scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the presented research is to improve the methodological approach to the implementation of controlling, monitoring and diagnostic functions in the process of substantiation of a promising production program of an agricultural enterprise in these conditions, which, unlike existing ones, is based on the methodology of statistical decision theory, high financial and economic efficiency in the study of information (parameters) about the technological discipline, which has no clear mathematical (regression) relationship. Practical value / implications. As a promising task for the development of the system of controlling, monitoring and diagnostics, it is determined the formation of mechanisms for programming the development of grain farming as the main specialization direction in the steppe conditions of Luhansk region on the principles of sectoral competitiveness, which will partially eliminate the reactivity of the management system of agricultural enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Fedicheva, Krystyna & Kochetkov, Oleksii & Honcharenko, Stanislav & Levkina, Ruslana & Bichevin, Maksym, 2021. "Controlling, monitoring and diagnostics in identifying effective management practices of agricultural enterprises," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:313636
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.313636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313636/files/11_Fedicheva_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.313636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shebanina, Olena & Burkovska, Anna & Petrenko, Vadym & Burkovska, Alla, 2023. "Economic planning at agricultural enterprises: Ukrainian experience of increasing the availability of data in the context of food security," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    2. Skrynkovskyy, Ruslan & Pavlenchyk, Nataliia & Tsyuh, Svyatoslav & Zanevskyy, Ihor & Pavlenchyk, Anatoliі, 2022. "Economic-mathematical model of enterprise profit maximization in the system of sustainable development values," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blazquez-Soriano, Amparo & Ramos-Sandoval, Rosmery, 2022. "Information transfer as a tool to improve the resilience of farmers against the effects of climate change: The case of the Peruvian National Agrarian Innovation System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Wicki, Ludwik & Wicka, Aleksandra, 2024. "Changes in the Macroenvironment and New Threats to Farms," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2024(2).
    3. Daxini, Amar & Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2019. "Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 428-437.
    4. Siqi Huang & Nik Hadiyan Nik Azman, 2023. "Enhancing Food Security through Digital Inclusive Finance: Evidence from Agricultural Enterprises in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Vigani, Mauro & Khafagy, Amr & Berry, Robert, 2024. "Public spending for agricultural risk management: Land use, regional welfare and intra-subsidy substitution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Jorge Freitas & Pedro Silva, 2022. "Sustainable Agricultural Systems for Fruit Orchards: The Influence of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria on the Soil Biodiversity and Nutrient Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Devon Johnson & Maya Almaraz & Jessica Rudnick & Lauren E. Parker & Steven M. Ostoja & Sat Darshan S. Khalsa, 2023. "Farmer Adoption of Climate-Smart Practices Is Driven by Farm Characteristics, Information Sources, and Practice Benefits and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, May.
    8. Krzysztof Pakuła & Krystyna Pieniak-Lendzion & Marcin Becher & Beata Kuziemska, 2021. "Selection of the supplier of production means as a risk element in farm logistics," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 585-594, June.
    9. Aslihan Arslan & Kristin Floress & Christine Lamanna & Leslie Lipper & Solomon Asfaw & Todd Rosenstock, 2020. "IFAD RESEARCH SERIES 63 - The adoption of improved agricultural technologies - A meta-analysis for Africa," IFAD Research Series 304758, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    10. Zaatra, Abderraouf & Kleftodimos, Georgios & Requier-Desjardins, Mélanie & Belhouchette, Hatem, 2025. "Economic valuation of groundwater over-exploitation in the Maghreb," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    11. Juan Carlos Pérez-Mesa & Francisco Javier Pérez-Mesa & Juan José Tapia-León & Diego Luis Valera, 2022. "Scheduling vegetable sales to supermarkets in Europe: The tomato case," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(11), pages 403-412.
    12. Chandra S. R. Nuthalapati & Chaitanya Nuthalapati, 2021. "Has Open Innovation Taken Root in India? Evidence from Startups Working in Food Value Chains," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1207-1230, December.
    13. Alan Renwick & Robyn Dynes & Paul Johnstone & Warren King & Lania Holt & Jemma Penelope, 2019. "Challenges and Opportunities for Land Use Transformation: Insights from the Central Plains Water Scheme in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Awais Ali & Tajamul Hussain & Noramon Tantashutikun & Nurda Hussain & Giacomo Cocetta, 2023. "Application of Smart Techniques, Internet of Things and Data Mining for Resource Use Efficient and Sustainable Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    16. Cécile Aubert & Yann Raineau & Marc Raynal & Nicolas Pasquier, 2024. "Multiple agricultural risks and insurance—issues, perspectives, and illustration for wine-growing," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 105(4), pages 371-391, December.
    17. Bastit, Félix & Brunette, Marielle & Montagné-Huck, Claire, 2023. "Pests, wind and fire: A multi-hazard risk review for natural disturbances in forests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Daniele Mozzato & Paola Gatto & Edi Defrancesco & Lucia Bortolini & Francesco Pirotti & Elena Pisani & Luigi Sartori, 2018. "The Role of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices: Can Geographical Context and Time Explain the Differences Emerging from Literature?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Wira Abu Bakar & Rabihah Md Sum, 2020. "Agriculture Risk Management: A Case Study on Rock Melon Farm in Sepang, Selangor, Malaysia," Food & Agribusiness Management (FABM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 75-82, June.
    20. Andreas Tsakiridis & Kevin Hanrahan & James Breen & Cathal O’Donoghue & Michael Wallace, 2025. "Modelling pasture-based beef production costs using panel data from farms with different soil quality," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 1-71, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:313636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.