IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/389056.html

Assessing the Dynamics and Scope of Farm Mechanization in Karnataka, India

Author

Listed:
  • Tabsum, Ayesha
  • Sharif, Mahin
  • Bindu, H. A.
  • Hurakadli, Kavita

Abstract

Agriculture plays an important and significant role in the development of a country. The Indian economy has undergone a tremendous change from agriculture dominance to non-agriculture dominance, as it is reflected in the decline in the share of agriculture in total income from 55 per cent in 1950-51 to 18.30 per cent in 2022-23. Farm mechanization holds substantial scope and importance in an agricultural landscape. It involves the integration of modern machinery and technology into various farming processes, ranging from initial soil preparation to the final harvest. In this regard, the study aimed to conduct research on the dynamics of nature and extent of farm mechanization across zones and crop-wise over the years and to understand the extent of farm mechanization in different operations of various crops. This study was based on the secondary data obtained from the Comprehensive Scheme for studying the Cost of Cultivation of Principal Crops of Karnataka. Data from 2011-12 to 2020-21 for 18 major crops were analysed using descriptive statistics, CAGR, and mechanization index. Here, data analysis was done using analytical tools such as Descriptive statistics, Mechanization Index (MI) and Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) analysis were used. The results revealed that the North East Transition Zone (6.73%) and Hill Zone (6.03%) have positive growth in farm mechanization. In 2020-21, North Eastern Dry Zone (41.76%) and Northern Dry Zone (36.65%) and Southern Transition Zone (28.80%) showed high mechanization, while Coastal Zone (16.18%), North Transition Zone (17.77%) and Southern Dry Zone (23.19%) have low mechanization. Overall, mechanization was 27 per cent in Karnataka, with a CAGR of 2 per cent. In paddy, red gram and green gram, the highest growth in mechanization was observed. The intercrop comparison revealed that paddy (41.81%) and green gram (35.69%) cultivation was more mechanized, while chilli (14.97%) was low mechanized. The share of machine labour cost was highest in paddy (18.67%). Operations such as preparatory tillage (49%), irrigation (41%) and harvesting/picking (41%) are more mechanized. Inter-zonal and inter-crop disparity in the adoption of farm mechanization is reported in this study. This can be overcome by improving the availability of farm power and farm machinery and equipment through expanding new custom hiring centres and developing suitable and affordable farm machinery and equipment engineered to specific crop and regional characteristics. Hence, enhancing farm machinery availability and encouraging private investments in rental services is crucial for expanding mechanization in the Karnataka state.

Suggested Citation

  • Tabsum, Ayesha & Sharif, Mahin & Bindu, H. A. & Hurakadli, Kavita, 2025. "Assessing the Dynamics and Scope of Farm Mechanization in Karnataka, India," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(7).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/389056/files/Tabsum4372025AJAEES133641.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belton, Ben & Win, Myat Thida & Zhang, Xiaobo & Filipski, Mateusz, 2021. "The rapid rise of agricultural mechanization in Myanmar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhi Li & Ming Zhu & Huang Huang & Yu Yi & Jingyi Fu, 2022. "Influencing Factors and Path Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Mechanization: Econometric Evidence from Hubei, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Hang Thi Thuy Nguyen & Thi Quynh Anh Le & Pham Xuan Hung & Nguyen Thai Phan, 2026. "Non-farm employment and agricultural mechanisation adoption: A reciprocal relationship," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 72(1), pages 37-55.
    3. Yuanying Chi & Wenbing Zhou & Zhenyu Wang & Yu Hu & Xiao Han, 2021. "The Influence Paths of Agricultural Mechanization on Green Agricultural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Meng, Meng & Zhang, Wuke & Zhu, Xi & Shi, Qinghua, 2024. "Agricultural mechanization and rural worker mobility: Evidence from the Agricultural Machinery Purchase Subsidies programme in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    5. Tefera, Yared Deribe & Awoke, Bisrat G. & Daum, Thomas, 2025. "What factors are inducing or impeding the adoption of agricultural mechanization? Revisiting farm scale, overhead capital and spatial divergence," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    6. Hua Zhang & Ying Li & Hanxiaoxue Sun & Xiaohui Wang, 2023. "How Can Digital Financial Inclusion Promote High-Quality Agricultural Development? The Multiple-Mediation Model Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Ning Geng & Shanyao Wang & Xibing Han, 2025. "Efficacy of Social Networks in Promoting the Green Production Behaviors of Chinese Farmers: An Empirical Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Brown, Brendan & Paudel, Gokul P. & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2021. "Visualising adoption processes through a stepwise framework: A case study of mechanisation on the Nepal Terai," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Min Zhou & Hua Zhang & Zixuan Zhang & Hanxiaoxue Sun, 2023. "Digital Financial Inclusion, Cultivated Land Transfer and Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Ma, Wanglin & Zhou, Xiaoshi & Boansi, David & Horlu, Godwin Seyram Agbemavor & Owusu, Victor, 2024. "Adoption and intensity of agricultural mechanization and their impact on non-farm employment of rural women," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Huaquan Zhang & Abbas Ali Chandio & Fan Yang & Yashuang Tang & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Ghulam Raza Sargani, 2022. "Modeling the Impact of Climatological Factors and Technological Revolution on Soybean Yield: Evidence from 13-Major Provinces of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Xue Shen & Quanyu Yang & Ting Qiu & Rongjun Ao, 2023. "Off-Farm Employment, Outsourced Machinery Services, and Farmers’ Ratoon Rice Production Behavior: Evidence from Rice Farmers in Central China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Jingmiao Shao & Chunyu Gao & Patience Afi Seglah & Jie Xie & Li Zhao & Yuyun Bi & Yajing Wang, 2023. "Analysis of the Available Straw Nutrient Resources and Substitution of Chemical Fertilizers with Straw Returned Directly to the Field in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Wangda Liao & Fusheng Zeng & Meseret Chanieabate, 2022. "Mechanization of Small-Scale Agriculture in China: Lessons for Enhancing Smallholder Access to Agricultural Machinery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    15. repec:ags:aaea22:335478 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Hilary Oliva Faxon, 2023. "Small farmers, big tech: agrarian commerce and knowledge on Myanmar Facebook," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 897-911, September.
    17. Song, Hengfei & Li, Xiubin & Xin, Liangjie & Wang, Xue, 2025. "Improving mechanization conditions or encouraging non-grain crop production? Strategies for mitigating farmland abandonment in China’s mountainous areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    18. Ziming Bai & Tianyi Wang & Jiabin Xu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Can Agricultural Productive Services Inhibit Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Huaquan Zhang & Yashuang Tang & Abbas Ali Chandio & Ghulam Raza Sargani & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi, 2022. "Measuring the Effects of Climate Change on Wheat Production: Evidence from Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    21. Liu, Yan & Chen, Minjie & Yu, Jianyu & Wang, Xiaobing, 2024. "Being a happy farmer: Technology adoption and subjective well-being," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 385-405.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.