IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/368230.html

Navigating Grassroots Innovation Journey in Tanzania: Factors Shaping Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Norah, Mdee
  • Catherine, Msuya
  • Innocent, Busindeli
  • Respikius, Martin

Abstract

Grassroots innovation is increasingly recognized for its potential to address localized challenges and promote sustainable development. This study addressed the factors influencing grassroots innovation journeys in Tanzania, utilizing PESTLE and SWOT analysis frameworks. A cross-sectional design was used to collect qualitative data guided by a semi-structured questionnaire from 35 grassroots innovators. 16 innovators were purposively selected from the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) innovators database, 11 were purposively selected from Mashindano ya Kitaifa ya Sayansi, Teknolojia na Ubunifu (MAKISATU) databases and 8 innovators were purposively selected from 2020, 2021 and 2022 and participants in the 45th and 46th Dar es Salaam International Trade Fair Exhibition (SABASABA) in 2021 and 2022. Key informant interviews and observations supplemented the collected data, identifying different prototypes according to the stages of innovation. Innovators were selected from 11 sectors: Agriculture, Information and Communication Technology, Environment, Energy, Engineering, Education, Health, Security, Transport, Industrial and Water. The findings highlight the critical role of political support, economic stability, technological access and community engagement in fostering successful grassroots innovation journeys. The study offers policy recommendations to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of grassroots innovation initiatives in Tanzania. Emphasizing the need for stable funding, robust legal frameworks and holistic approach to address multifaceted challenges. This includes policy reforms, economic incentives, societal attitude shifts, technological support, legal clarity and infrastructural improvements. By tackling these issues comprehensively, Tanzania can create a more vibrant and inclusive innovation ecosystem, unlocking the potential of its innovators to drive sustainable development and economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Norah, Mdee & Catherine, Msuya & Innocent, Busindeli & Respikius, Martin, 2025. "Navigating Grassroots Innovation Journey in Tanzania: Factors Shaping Innovation," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(3), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:368230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/368230/files/Norah4332025AJAEES132181.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juma, Calestous, 2016. "Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190467036.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269.
    2. Darcy W.E. Allen, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Exit: Developing the Cryptoeconomy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Melanie Swan & Jason Potts & Soichiro Takagi & Frank Witte & Paolo Tasca (ed.), Blockchain Economics: Implications of Distributed Ledgers Markets, Communications Networks, and Algorithmic Reality, chapter 10, pages 197-214, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Ian Miles, 2020. "A Disrupted Future?," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 6-27.
    4. SAKA Rahmon Olawale & OSADEME Gloria Chinagozi & ONONOKPONO Nyong Joe, 2023. "Technopreneurship and Business Performance of Ride-Hailing Firms in Lagos State," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(4), pages 1367-1383, April.
    5. Chunyan Zhou & Henry Etzkowitz, 2021. "Triple Helix Twins: A Framework for Achieving Innovation and UN Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. repec:ehl:lserod:90534 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Michaela Carni & Tamar Gur & Yossi Maaravi, 2024. "Entrepreneurs’ Social Capital in Overcoming Business Challenges: Case Studies of Seven Greentech, Climate Tech and Agritech Startups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-26, September.
    8. O'Brien, Patrick, 2018. "Cosmographies for the discovery, development and diffusion of useful and reliable knowledge in pre-industrial Europe and Late imperial China: a survey and speculation," Economic History Working Papers 90534, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    9. Ongo Nkoa, Bruno Emmanuel & Fonguen-Kong-Ngoh, Arnaud Barnabé, 2024. "Industrialisation in Africa: The role of energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Gagnon, Mark A. & Broad, Garrett & Grandison, Kelia & Chiles, Robert M., . "AgriTech investor and informant perspectives about cellular agriculture," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(01).
    11. Adu-Baffour, Ferdinand & Daum, Thomas & Birner, Regina, "undated". "Can Big Companies’ Initiatives to Promote Mechanization Benefit Small Farms in Africa? A Case Study from Zambia," Discussion Papers 273521, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    12. Mikayla Novak, 2024. "Sociologically influenced coevolutionary dynamics," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 473-493, October.
    13. Pînzaru Florina & Zbuchea Alexandra & Stratone Mădălina-Elena, 2025. "AI in Project Management: Technical Prerequisites, Digital Knowledge, and Organizational Maturity," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 4146-4160.
    14. Mugwagwa, Julius & Banda, Geoffrey & Ozor, Nicholas & Bolo, Maurice & Oriama, Ruth, 2022. "Optimising governance capabilities for science, research and innovation in Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Philipp Aerni, 2021. "The Ethics of Farm Animal Biotechnology from an Anthropological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Steve J. Bickley & Alison Macintyre & Benno Torgler, 2021. "Safety in Smart, Livable Cities: Acknowledging the Human Factor," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-17, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    17. Jeffry Frieden & Arthur Silve, 2023. "The political reception of innovations," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 595-628, July.
    18. V. Shestak P. & E. Moreva I. & I. Tyutyunnik G. & В. Шестак П. & Е. Морева Л. & И. Тютюнник Г., 2019. "Финансовое управление инновационной активностью // Financial Management of Innovative Activity," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 23(6), pages 63-75.
    19. Wu, Min & Lin, Angie Shi Qi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2024. "The effects of motivated consumer innovativeness on consumer acceptance of autonomous delivery robots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Goodman, Nathan P. & Lehto, Otto & Novak, Mikayla, 2025. "Institutional diversity and innovative recombination," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    21. Henry Etzkowitz & Alex Mack & Thomas Schaffer & Jim Scopa & Lei Guo & Tatiana Pospelova, 2020. "Innovation by design: SPARK and the Overcoming of Stanford University's Translational “Valley of Death” in Bio‐Medicine," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1113-1125, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:368230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.