IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357366.html

Explaining Poverty and Inequality Changes in Rural Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Toyin, Adigun Grace
  • Timothy, Awoyemi Taiwo
  • Oladayo, Ajala Abiodun

Abstract

The problem of poverty and inequality has been a long standing issue in most Sub-sahara African countries including Nigeria. The rural poverty situation in Nigeria was assessed using three datasets which include; 1996 National Consumer Survey (NCS), 2004 National Living Standard Survey (NLSS) and 2008/09 Harmonized National Living Standard Survey (HNLSS) all sourced from the National Bureau of Statistics.The level of poverty in the rural area was more severe in 1996 than in 2004. It was 69.2 per cent in 1996 and 65.1 per cent in 2004 indicating a reduction of -5.9 per cent. In 2010, poverty headcount rose by 9.06 per cent. Elasticity of Total Poverty with Respect to Average Income Growth shows that a unit change in income growth results in -0.86 poverty headcount meaning if income rises by 10 per cent, poverty will be reduced by 8.6 percent. Poverty gap with elasticity of -1.38 shows more decrease in poverty than headcount. Severity with elasticity of -1.72 indicates that with 10 percent increase in income growth, poverty will be reduced by 17.2 per cent. Severity (α = 2) is therefore the most poverty sensitive measure. Elasticity of total poverty with respect to inequality indicates that if inequality increases by 1 unit, Headcount (P0) increases by 0.095. Similarly, poverty gap (P1) of 1.26 implies that a unit increment in inequality pushes poverty up by 1.26. The trend continues with poverty severity index, P2 which increases poverty by 2.41 percent with a unit increase in inequality. Policies targeted at reducing inequality of opportunities among rural population will go a long way in alleviating poverty and in achieving the millennium Development Goal1.

Suggested Citation

  • Toyin, Adigun Grace & Timothy, Awoyemi Taiwo & Oladayo, Ajala Abiodun, 2015. "Explaining Poverty and Inequality Changes in Rural Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 5(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357366/files/Toyin542014AJAEES15656.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucia Hanmer & Felix Naschold, 2000. "Attaining the International Development Targets: Will Growth Be Enough?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 11-36, March.
    2. John A. List & Craig A. Gallet, 1999. "The Kuznets Curve: What Happens After the Inverted‐U?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(2), pages 200-206, June.
    3. David Coady & Emmanuel Skoufias, 2004. "On the Targeting and Redistributive Efficiencies of Alternative Transfer Instruments," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 50(1), pages 11-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sousa, Alexandre Gervasio & Araujo, Aracy Alves & Santos, Ricardo Bruno Nascimento dos & Santos, Francivane Teles Pampolha Dos & Diniz, Marvelo Bentes, 2008. "Sustentabilidade e meio ambiente no Brasil: uma análise a partir da curva de Kuznets," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil 103103, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
    2. Paul Mosley, 2013. "Two Africas? Why Africa’s ‘Growth Miracle’ is barely reducing poverty," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 19113, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Ms. Anne Epaulard, 2003. "Macroeconomic Performance and Poverty Reduction," IMF Working Papers 2003/072, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Diaz-Bonilla, Eugenio & Thomas, Marcelle & Robinson, Sherman, 2002. "On Boxes, Contents And Users: Food Security And The Wto Negotiations," TMD Discussion Papers 16266, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Zaman, Khalid & Khilji, Bashir Ahmad, 2013. "The relationship between growth and poverty in forecasting framework: Pakistan's future in the year 2035," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 468-491.
    6. Bourguignon, Francois, 2005. "The Effect of Economic Growth on Social Structures," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 27, pages 1701-1747, Elsevier.
    7. Collier, Paul & Dollar, David, 2001. "Can the World Cut Poverty in Half? How Policy Reform and Effective Aid Can Meet International Development Goals," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1787-1802, November.
    8. Bigsten, Arne & Shimeles, Abebe, 2005. "Can Africa Reduce Poverty by Half by 2015? The Case for a Pro-Poor Growth Strategy," Working Papers in Economics 177, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    9. Natalia Vashchelyuk, 2015. "The Impact of Output Dynamics on Income Inequality in the Russian Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 132-144.
    10. repec:pru:wpaper:21 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Crespo, Cristian, 2020. "Two become one: improving the targeting of conditional cash transfers with a predictive model of school dropout," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123139, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Chikako Yamauchi, 2010. "Community-Based Targeting and Initial Local Conditions: Evidence from Indonesia's IDT Program," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(1), pages 95-147, October.
    13. Nanak Kakwani & Marcelo Neri & Hyun H. Son, 2006. "Linkages between Pro-Poor Growth, Social Programmes and Labour Market: The Recent Brazilian Experience," Working Papers 26, International Policy Centre.
    14. Paul A. Dorosh & Mr. David Coady & Bart Minten, 2008. "Evaluating Alternative Approaches to Poverty Alleviation: Rice Tariffs Versus Targeted Transfers in Madagascar," IMF Working Papers 2008/009, International Monetary Fund.
    15. Tuominen Elina, 2016. "Reversal of the Kuznets curve: Study on the inequality–development relation using top income shares data," Working Papers 1610, Tampere University, Faculty of Management and Business, Economics.
    16. Kemal ERKİŞİ & Turgay CEYHAN, 2020. "The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Panel Data Analysis," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(43).
    17. İsmail Hakkı İşcan & Tuğba Demirel, 2024. "The Relationship Among Trade Openness, Financial Development and Economic Growth Indicators and Income Distribution Inequality: Testing the Kuznets, Financial Kuznets, and Stolper-Samuelson Hypotheses," Journal of Economic Policy Researches, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Worako, T.K. & Jordaan, H. & Van Schalkwyk, H.D., 2011. "Investigating Volatility in Coffee Prices Along the Ethiopian Coffee Value Chain," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 50(3), September.
    19. Coady, David P. & Parker, Susan W., 2005. "Program participation under means-testing and self-selection targeting methods," FCND briefs 191, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Kalwij, A.S. & Verschoor, A., 2004. "How Good is Growth for the Poor? The Role of Initial Income Distribution in Regional Diversity in Poverty Trends," Other publications TiSEM 199ed5a4-ad69-4cf9-81d7-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    21. Gunawardena, Aruni, 2012. "Effects of Increasing Agricultural Productivity: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for Sri Lanka," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124313, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.