IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357366.html

Explaining Poverty and Inequality Changes in Rural Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Toyin, Adigun Grace
  • Timothy, Awoyemi Taiwo
  • Oladayo, Ajala Abiodun

Abstract

The problem of poverty and inequality has been a long standing issue in most Sub-sahara African countries including Nigeria. The rural poverty situation in Nigeria was assessed using three datasets which include; 1996 National Consumer Survey (NCS), 2004 National Living Standard Survey (NLSS) and 2008/09 Harmonized National Living Standard Survey (HNLSS) all sourced from the National Bureau of Statistics.The level of poverty in the rural area was more severe in 1996 than in 2004. It was 69.2 per cent in 1996 and 65.1 per cent in 2004 indicating a reduction of -5.9 per cent. In 2010, poverty headcount rose by 9.06 per cent. Elasticity of Total Poverty with Respect to Average Income Growth shows that a unit change in income growth results in -0.86 poverty headcount meaning if income rises by 10 per cent, poverty will be reduced by 8.6 percent. Poverty gap with elasticity of -1.38 shows more decrease in poverty than headcount. Severity with elasticity of -1.72 indicates that with 10 percent increase in income growth, poverty will be reduced by 17.2 per cent. Severity (α = 2) is therefore the most poverty sensitive measure. Elasticity of total poverty with respect to inequality indicates that if inequality increases by 1 unit, Headcount (P0) increases by 0.095. Similarly, poverty gap (P1) of 1.26 implies that a unit increment in inequality pushes poverty up by 1.26. The trend continues with poverty severity index, P2 which increases poverty by 2.41 percent with a unit increase in inequality. Policies targeted at reducing inequality of opportunities among rural population will go a long way in alleviating poverty and in achieving the millennium Development Goal1.

Suggested Citation

  • Toyin, Adigun Grace & Timothy, Awoyemi Taiwo & Oladayo, Ajala Abiodun, 2015. "Explaining Poverty and Inequality Changes in Rural Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 5(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357366/files/Toyin542014AJAEES15656.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. List & Craig A. Gallet, 1999. "The Kuznets Curve: What Happens After the Inverted‐U?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(2), pages 200-206, June.
    2. David Coady & Emmanuel Skoufias, 2004. "On the Targeting and Redistributive Efficiencies of Alternative Transfer Instruments," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 50(1), pages 11-27, March.
    3. Lucia Hanmer & Felix Naschold, 2000. "Attaining the International Development Targets: Will Growth Be Enough?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 18(1), pages 11-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bourguignon, Francois, 2005. "The Effect of Economic Growth on Social Structures," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 27, pages 1701-1747, Elsevier.
    2. repec:pru:wpaper:21 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Crespo, Cristian, 2020. "Two become one: improving the targeting of conditional cash transfers with a predictive model of school dropout," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123139, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Nanak Kakwani & Marcelo Neri & Hyun H. Son, 2006. "Linkages between Pro-Poor Growth, Social Programmes and Labour Market: The Recent Brazilian Experience," Working Papers 26, International Policy Centre.
    5. White, Howard & Blondal, Nina, 2007. "Projecting Progress toward the Millennium Development Goals," MPRA Paper 5687, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Kalwij, A.S. & Verschoor, A., 2004. "How Good is Growth for the Poor? The Role of Initial Income Distribution in Regional Diversity in Poverty Trends," Other publications TiSEM 199ed5a4-ad69-4cf9-81d7-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Lonnie Stevans & David Sessions, 2001. "Minimum Wage Policy and Poverty in the United States," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 65-75.
    8. repec:kap:iaecre:v:16:y:2010:i:4:p:410-418 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Sébastien Breau & Annie Lee, 2023. "The evolution of the Kuznets curve in Canada," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(4), pages 709-735, August.
    10. Adama Bah & Samuel Bazzi & Sudarno Sumarto & Julia Tobias, 2019. "Finding the Poor vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Exploring the Drivers of Targeting Effectiveness in Indonesia," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 33(3), pages 573-597.
    11. Kalwij, Adriaan & Verschoor, Arjan, 2007. "Not by growth alone: The role of the distribution of income in regional diversity in poverty reduction," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 805-829, May.
    12. Simon Maxwell, 2001. "Innovative and important, yes, but also instrumental and incomplete: the treatment of redistribution in the new 'New Poverty Agenda'," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 331-341.
    13. Kakwani, Nanak & Neri, Marcelo Côrtes & Son, Hyun H., 2010. "Linkages Between Pro-Poor Growth, Social Programs and Labor Market: The Recent Brazilian Experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 881-894, June.
    14. Kimhi, Ayal, "undated". "Growth, Inequality and Labor Markets in LDCs: A Survey," Discussion Papers 289990, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    15. Cassandro Mendes & Olugbenga Adesida, 2013. "Income inequality and economic development: evidence from sub-Saharan African countries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(2), pages 1565-1574.
    16. Del Rey, Elena & Estevan, Fernanda, 2013. "Conditional cash transfers and education quality in the presence of credit constraints," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 76-84.
    17. Brent Robert J., 2013. "A cost-benefit framework for evaluating conditional cash-transfer programs," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 159-180, August.
    18. Fan, Shenggen & Johnson, Michael E. & Saurkar, Anuja & Makombe, Tsitsi, 2007. "Investing in African agriculture to halve poverty by 2015," ReSAKSS issue notes 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. János Pénzes & Zoltán Bujdosó & Lóránt Dávid & Zsolt Radics & Gábor Kozma, 2014. "Differing development paths of spatial income inequalities after the political transition — by the example of Hungary and its regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 73-84.
    20. Narain Sinha, 2005. "Growth, Inequality and Structural Adjustment: An Empirical Interpretation of the S-Curve for the Indian Economy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Raghbendra Jha (ed.), Economic Growth, Economic Performance and Welfare in South Asia, chapter 18, pages 369-383, Palgrave Macmillan.
    21. Jennifer Mbabazi & Oliver Morrissey & Chris Milner, 2001. "Are Inequality and Trade Liberalization Influences on Growth and Poverty?," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2001-132, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    22. Piotr R. Paradowski & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2025. "Inequality, poverty, and child benefits: evidence from a natural experiment," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 242-262, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.