IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v41y2025i3p242-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality, poverty, and child benefits: evidence from a natural experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr R. Paradowski
  • Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz

Abstract

In this article, we empirically address the link between policy, and inequality and child poverty. Our analysis fills a gap in policy assessment research by examining the effect of introducing a cash universal child benefit (the program Family 500+ in 2016 in Poland) on income inequality and poverty, specifically child poverty. The analysis utilizes micro-level household data from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) and Statistics Poland. We examine the changes in various indicators of inequality and poverty and their decomposition. All conducted distributional analyses suggest that a decrease in income inequality and poverty reduction is attributable to the program Family 500 + . We assess relative and subjective poverty and show that both are influenced by the program. The causal relationship between the benefit and the decline in child relative and subjective poverty is confirmed by difference-in-differences estimation, in which treated and non-treated households are compared before and after the program’s introduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr R. Paradowski & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2025. "Inequality, poverty, and child benefits: evidence from a natural experiment," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 242-262, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:3:p:242-262
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2025.2487372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2487372
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2025.2487372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:41:y:2025:i:3:p:242-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.