IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jsesro/v4y2015i2p42-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Much Is The It Field Enhancing The Economic Activity Of The Romanian Counties?

Author

Listed:
  • Vasile Alecsandru STRAT

    (Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest/Department of Statistics and Econometrics)

Abstract

The main goal of this research is to provide a first quantitative assessment of the IT business sector at the level of the Romanian counties. The research is conducted using yearly data, presented at county level, for the period 2008 – 2014. All time series regarding characteristics of the IT businesses were acquired from the Office of the National Trade Register, while all other data were downloaded from the Tempo database of the NIS. The methodology employed during this research includes the evaluation of the evolution of the county level disparities and the identification of some important county level characteristics, which favor the development of the IT business sector. An important finding reveals that we can talk about a king and viceroy effect in the field, namely about Bucharest, Cluj County and Iasi County which concentrate a significant part of the field’s activity. Moreover, the most important 10 counties account for over 90% of the total turnover from the field. Other significant findings indicate the following county level characteristics as good indicators of the development level of the IT field, at county level: R&D employees, GDP and population of the capital city.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasile Alecsandru STRAT, 2015. "How Much Is The It Field Enhancing The Economic Activity Of The Romanian Counties?," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 42-53, DECEMBER.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:jsesro:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:42-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jses.ase.ro/downloads/Vol4NO2/Strat.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Certo, S. Trevis & Miller, Toyah, 2008. "Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 267-271.
    2. Cerqueti, Roy & Ausloos, Marcel, 2015. "Evidence of economic regularities and disparities of Italian regions from aggregated tax income size data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 421(C), pages 187-207.
    3. William Knudson & Allen Wysocki & Joseph Champagne & H. Christopher Peterson, 2004. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in the Agri-Food System," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1330-1336.
    4. Jim Taylor & Steve Bradley, 1997. "Unemployment in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Disparities in Germany, Italy and the UK," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 221-245, May.
    5. repec:bla:kyklos:v:50:y:1997:i:2:p:221-45 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Zizi Goschin & Daniela-L. Constantin & Monica Roman & Bogdan Ileanu, 2008. "The current state and dynamics of regional disparities in Romania," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 2(2), pages 80-105, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriana DAVIDESCU & Vasile Alecsandru STRAT, 2014. "Coordinates of a New Romanian Regional Policy - Identifying the Development Poles. A Case Study," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(2), pages 88-99.
    2. Vicente Rios Ibañez, 2014. "What drives regional unemployment convergence?," ERSA conference papers ersa14p924, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Galiani, Sebastian & Lamarche, Carlos & Porto, Alberto & Sosa-Escudero, Walter, 2005. "Persistence and regional disparities in unemployment (Argentina 1980-1997)," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 375-394, July.
    4. Nosheena Yasir & Nasir Mahmood & Hafiz Shakir Mehmood & Osama Rashid & An Liren, 2021. "The Integrated Role of Personal Values and Theory of Planned Behavior to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Higgins, Lindsey M. & Schroeter, Christiane & Wright, Carlyn, 2018. "Lighting the flame of entrepreneurship among agribusiness students," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(1).
    6. Hau-Lin Tam & Edward Asamoah & Angus Yuk-Fung Chan, 2021. "Developing Social Entrepreneurship as an Intervention to Enhance Disadvantaged Young People’s Sense of Self-Worth and Career Competence in Hong Kong," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(6), pages 2497-2526, December.
    7. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    8. Barbara Bradač Hojnik & Katja Crnogaj, 2020. "Social Impact, Innovations, and Market Activity of Social Enterprises: Comparison of European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    10. Dobrota Gabriela, 2015. "Analysis And Comparisons Of The Business Sector In Romania In Regional And National Level Under The Influence Of Macroeconomic Developments," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 95-100, December.
    11. repec:zbw:ifwkwp:1309 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Merkl, Christian & Snower, Dennis J., 2008. "Escaping the unemployment trap: The case of East Germany," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 542-556, December.
    13. Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Rogelio Puente-Diaz, 2019. "The Influence of Marketing Capability in Mexican Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Puie Florina Răzvanţă, 2019. "Conceptual framework for rural business models," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1130-1139, May.
    15. Abele Kuipers & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Aldona Stalgienė & Anita Ule & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "European Dairy Farmers’ Perceptions and Responses towards Development Strategies in Years of Turbulent Market and Policy Changes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    16. repec:sgm:resrep:y:2013:v:2013:i:1:p:43-55 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Michel Blanc & François Hild, 2008. "Analyse des marchés locaux du travail : du chômage à l'emploi," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 415(1), pages 45-60.
    18. J Herbst & H Ingham & M Ingham, 2005. "Local unemployment in Poland," Working Papers 566803, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    19. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 735-761, July.
    20. Inmaculada Garcia-Mainar & Victor Montuenga-Gomez, 2003. "The Spanish Wage Curve: 1994-1996," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 929-945.
    21. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 260-276, June.
    22. Dias, Cláudia & Franco, Mário, 2018. "Cooperation in tradition or tradition in cooperation? Networks of agricultural entrepreneurs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 36-48.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    IT field; panel data; Romanian counties; regional disparities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jsesro:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:42-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan-Vasile Ileanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.