IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icmbdj/v1y2018i2p14-32.html

Blockchain: China’s Leading E-commerce Players Innovate in Traceability

Author

Listed:
  • Bălan Carmen

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The purpose of the research presented in this paper is to identify the answer to the following question: “RQ: Which is the present stage of the innovative blockchain-enabled traceability initiatives of China’s leading e-commerce players?†. A literature survey in prominent databases revealed that such review question is raised for the first time. The use of blockchain for goods traceability is extremely recent. The topic is almost absent in the research literature on logistics and supply chain. Consequently, an exploratory research design was applied. The research focused on the Alibaba Group and JD.com, China’s leading e-commerce players. Both players seized the opportunities of the new technology to improve goods traceability and supply chain transparency. They took initiatives and launched projects on blockchain-enhanced traceability. The present stage is pilot testing and a business ecosystem paradigm is applied. Implications for the e-commerce players that intend to use blockchain to enhance traceability are presented. They range from project aim and scope to strong partnerships and standardisation. The papaer addresses a research question in the nascent study field of blockchain-enabled traceability. Specific implications for practice are disclosed. A substantial agenda for further research is suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Bălan Carmen, 2018. "Blockchain: China’s Leading E-commerce Players Innovate in Traceability," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(2), pages 14-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2018:i:2:p:14-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mbd.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/icmbdj/2018/ICMBDJ_V2_2018_59.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kshetri, Nir, 2017. "Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1027-1038.
    2. Khaqqi, Khamila Nurul & Sikorski, Janusz J. & Hadinoto, Kunn & Kraft, Markus, 2018. "Incorporating seller/buyer reputation-based system in blockchain-enabled emission trading application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 8-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiang Wang & Min Su & Min Zhang & Rongrong Li, 2021. "Integrating Digital Technologies and Public Health to Fight Covid-19 Pandemic: Key Technologies, Applications, Challenges and Outlook of Digital Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-50, June.
    2. Hanghang Dong & Jun Yang & Xiaoming Li & Lan Xu, 2024. "Explore the Impact Mechanism of Block Chain Technology on China's Carbon Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 105-135, July.
    3. Umar, Abdullah & Kumar, Deepak & Ghose, Tirthadip, 2022. "Blockchain-based decentralized energy intra-trading with battery storage flexibility in a community microgrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    4. Ana-Maria Florescu & Claudio Vitari & Serge Amabile, 2025. "Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance," Post-Print hal-05251774, HAL.
    5. Lei, Yu-Tian & Ma, Chao-Qun & Mirza, Nawazish & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Narayan, Seema Wati & Chen, Xun-Qi, 2022. "A renewable energy microgrids trading management platform based on permissioned blockchain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Steve Simske & Horst Treiblmaier, 2021. "Blockchain Technologies in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-28, October.
    7. Amin Shokri & Ali Shokri & Dean White & Richard Gelski & Yosse Goldberg & Stephen Harrison & Taha Hossein Rashidi, 2022. "EnviroCoin: A Holistic, Blockchain Empowered, Consensus-Based Carbon Saving Unit Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    9. Changping Zhao & Juanjuan Sun & Yu Gong & Zhi Li & Peter Zhou, 2022. "Research on the Blue Carbon Trading Market System under Blockchain Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. repec:rbs:ijbess:v:7:y:2026:i:6:p:330-343 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Rui Sun & Dayi He & Jingjing Yan & Li Tao, 2021. "Mechanism Analysis of Applying Blockchain Technology to Forestry Carbon Sink Projects Based on the Differential Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Eduard Romulus Goean & Xavier Font & Yu Xiong & Susanne Becken & Jonathan L. Chenoweth & Lorenzo Fioramonti & James Higham & Amit Kumar Jaiswal & Jhuma Sadhukhan & Ya-Yen Sun & Horst Treiblmaier & Sen, 2024. "Using the Blockchain to Reduce Carbon Emissions in the Visitor Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2020. "Does the different sectoral coverage matter? An analysis of China's carbon trading market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Sam Hartmann & Sebastian Thomas, 2020. "Applying Blockchain to the Australian Carbon Market," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(2), pages 133-151, June.
    15. Ante, L. & Steinmetz, F. & Fiedler, I., 2021. "Blockchain and energy: A bibliometric analysis and review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Giuliano Sansone & Flavio Santalucia & Davide Viglialoro & Paolo Landoni, 2023. "Blockchain for social good and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from a case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2182-2193, September.
    17. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    18. Golinucci, Nicolò & Tonini, Francesco & Rocco, Matteo Vincenzo & Colombo, Emanuela, 2023. "Towards BitCO2, an individual consumption-based carbon emission reduction mechanism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Cai, Qinqin & Xu, Ying & Yi, Zhongkai & Tu, Zhenghong, 2025. "TSO-DSO coordination in the joint balancing and flexibility markets considering classification and participation of VPPs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    20. Marsela Thanasi-Boçe & Julian Hoxha, 2025. "Blockchain for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-38, May.
    21. Priti Jagwani & V. B. Singh & Noopur Agrawal & Aditya P. Tripathi, 2023. "Blockchain technology and software engineering practices: a systematic review of literature using topic modelling approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
    • O39 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:1:y:2018:i:2:p:14-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.