IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05251774.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Ana-Maria Florescu

    (CERGAM de Toulon - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille/Equipe de recherche de Toulon - CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - IAE Toulon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Toulon - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Claudio Vitari

    (CERGAM de Toulon - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille/Equipe de recherche de Toulon - CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - IAE Toulon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Toulon - UTLN - Université de Toulon, LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Serge Amabile

    (CERGAM de Toulon - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille/Equipe de recherche de Toulon - CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - IAE Toulon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Toulon - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

As digital transformation accelerates, cybersecurity has emerged as a critical concern for organizations worldwide, driven by escalating cyber threats, geopolitical tensions, and increasingly complex supply chains. Effective inter-organizational collaboration in cybersecurity governance relies on trust, which influences information sharing, coordinated threat responses, and risk-management. This study explores how formal and informal rules shape trust dynamics in inter-organizational cybersecurity governance, using Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. A grounded theory approach is employed through a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews. Preliminary findings highlight key barriers to trust-building, including partnership failures, disinformation, and geopolitical trust deficits, while identifying potential solutions such as blockchain, AI-driven security models, and structured cybersecurity disclosure frameworks. Trust also requires governance frameworks that balance compliance with collaboration. By advancing theoretical and practical insights, this research informs policymakers, cybersecurity leaders, and IS scholars on designing trust-centric cybersecurity ecosystems in an era of global digital uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana-Maria Florescu & Claudio Vitari & Serge Amabile, 2025. "Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance," Post-Print hal-05251774, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05251774
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05251774v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05251774v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kshetri, Nir, 2017. "Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1027-1038.
    2. Rajiv D Banker & Hsihui Chang & Yi-Ching Kao, 2010. "Evaluating cross-organizational impacts of information technology – an empirical analysis," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 153-167, April.
    3. Joost F Wolfswinkel & Elfi Furtmueller & Celeste P M Wilderom, 2013. "Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 45-55, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    2. Xiaobao Zhu & Jing Shi & Fengjie Xie & Rouqi Song, 2020. "Pricing strategy and system performance in a cloud-based manufacturing system built on blockchain technology," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1985-2002, December.
    3. Haotian Zhu & Yao Sun & Junfeng Yang, 2025. "Towards responsible artificial intelligence in education: a systematic review on identifying and mitigating ethical risks," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Kirimhan, Destan, 2023. "Importance of anti-money laundering regulations among prosumers for a cybersecure decentralized finance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Sujata Seshadrinathan & Shalini Chandra, 2025. "Trusting the trustless blockchain for its adoption in accounting: theorizing the mediating role of technology-organization-environment framework," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-39, December.
    6. Ma, Chao-Qun & Lei, Yu-Tian & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Chen, Xun-Qi & Wang, Yi-Ran & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Systematic analysis of the blockchain in the energy sector: Trends, issues, and future directions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    7. Narendra Gariya & Anjas Asrani & Adhirath Mandal & Amir Shaikh & Dowan Cha, 2025. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Integrating Blockchain Technology into the Energy Supply Chain for the Enhancement of Transparency and Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Yang Lu & Peixin Zuo & José C. Alves & Jinliang Wang, 2023. "Unlocking the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and international performance: A systematic review," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 464-504, December.
    9. Desveaud, Kathleen & Mandler, Timo & Eisend, Martin, 2024. "A meta-model of customer brand loyalty and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Matthias Fabian Gregersen Trischler & Jason Li-Ying, 2023. "Digital business model innovation: toward construct clarity and future research directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 3-32, January.
    11. Priti Jagwani & V. B. Singh & Noopur Agrawal & Aditya P. Tripathi, 2023. "Blockchain technology and software engineering practices: a systematic review of literature using topic modelling approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Konstantinos Siassiakos & Stamatia Ilioudi & Tsaktsira Effrosyni & Vasiliki Mitsiou & Dimitris Nanouris, 2020. "Utilization of Blockchain Technology in Greek Public Administration," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12.
    13. Nianqi Deng & Yangyan Shi & Junbin Wang & Jighyasu Gaur, 2025. "Testing the adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management among MSMEs in China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 350(2), pages 629-648, July.
    14. James R. Barth & Hemantha S. B. Herath & Tejaswini C. Herath & Pei Xu, 2020. "Cryptocurrency valuation and ethics: a text analytic approach," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 367-388, July.
    15. Dutta, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Somani, Surabhi & Butala, Richa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    16. Irem Nur Ecemis & Fatih Ekinci & Koray Acici & Mehmet Serdar Guzel & Ihsan Tolga Medeni & Tunc Asuroglu, 2024. "Exploring Blockchain for Nuclear Material Tracking: A Scoping Review and Innovative Model Proposal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Michaelis, Anne & Hanny, Lisa & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Strüker, Jens & Weibelzahl, Martin, 2024. "Consumer-centric electricity markets: Six design principles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Patricia Akello & Nicole Lang Beebe & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, 2025. "A literature survey of security issues in Cloud, Fog, and Edge IT infrastructure," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 705-739, April.
    19. Huang, Wensheng & Wang, Xiaochen & Zhang, Qianyao & Han, Junhui & Zhang, Runtong, 2025. "Beyond likes and comments: How social proof influences consumer impulse buying on short-form video platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Teng, Sin Yong & Touš, Michal & Leong, Wei Dong & How, Bing Shen & Lam, Hon Loong & Máša, Vítězslav, 2021. "Recent advances on industrial data-driven energy savings: Digital twins and infrastructures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05251774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.