IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05251774.html

Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Ana-Maria Florescu

    (CERGAM de Toulon - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille/Equipe de recherche de Toulon - CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - IAE Toulon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Toulon - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Claudio Vitari

    (CERGAM de Toulon - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille/Equipe de recherche de Toulon - CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - IAE Toulon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Toulon - UTLN - Université de Toulon, LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Serge Amabile

    (CERGAM de Toulon - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille/Equipe de recherche de Toulon - CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon - IAE Toulon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Toulon - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

As digital transformation accelerates, cybersecurity has emerged as a critical concern for organizations worldwide, driven by escalating cyber threats, geopolitical tensions, and increasingly complex supply chains. Effective inter-organizational collaboration in cybersecurity governance relies on trust, which influences information sharing, coordinated threat responses, and risk-management. This study explores how formal and informal rules shape trust dynamics in inter-organizational cybersecurity governance, using Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. A grounded theory approach is employed through a systematic literature review and semi-structured interviews. Preliminary findings highlight key barriers to trust-building, including partnership failures, disinformation, and geopolitical trust deficits, while identifying potential solutions such as blockchain, AI-driven security models, and structured cybersecurity disclosure frameworks. Trust also requires governance frameworks that balance compliance with collaboration. By advancing theoretical and practical insights, this research informs policymakers, cybersecurity leaders, and IS scholars on designing trust-centric cybersecurity ecosystems in an era of global digital uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana-Maria Florescu & Claudio Vitari & Serge Amabile, 2025. "Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance Trust Dynamics in Inter-Organizational Cybersecurity Governance," Post-Print hal-05251774, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05251774
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05251774v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05251774v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kshetri, Nir, 2017. "Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1027-1038.
    2. Rajiv D Banker & Hsihui Chang & Yi-Ching Kao, 2010. "Evaluating cross-organizational impacts of information technology – an empirical analysis," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 153-167, April.
    3. Joost F Wolfswinkel & Elfi Furtmueller & Celeste P M Wilderom, 2013. "Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 45-55, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diamanta VITO & Maja KLUN & Iztok RAKAR, 2024. "A Concept Of Maturity Model For Gender Responsive Budgeting At Local Level," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2024(42), pages 76-98.
    2. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    3. Myriam Schaschek & Fabian Gwinner & Nicolas Neis & Christoph Tomitza & Christian Zeiß & Axel Winkelmann, 2024. "Managing next generation BP-x initiatives," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 457-500, September.
    4. Erhan Baran & Tulay Korkusuz Polat, 2022. "Classification of Industry 4.0 for Total Quality Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Xiaobao Zhu & Jing Shi & Fengjie Xie & Rouqi Song, 2020. "Pricing strategy and system performance in a cloud-based manufacturing system built on blockchain technology," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1985-2002, December.
    7. Haotian Zhu & Yao Sun & Junfeng Yang, 2025. "Towards responsible artificial intelligence in education: a systematic review on identifying and mitigating ethical risks," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Kirimhan, Destan, 2023. "Importance of anti-money laundering regulations among prosumers for a cybersecure decentralized finance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Sujata Seshadrinathan & Shalini Chandra, 2025. "Trusting the trustless blockchain for its adoption in accounting: theorizing the mediating role of technology-organization-environment framework," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-39, December.
    10. Tenanoia Simona & Tauisi Taupo & Pedro Antunes, 2023. "A Scoping Review on Agency Collaboration in Emergency Management Based on the 3C Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 291-302, February.
    11. Macnish, Kevin & van der Ham, Jeroen, 2020. "Ethics in cybersecurity research and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Subhodeep Mukherjee & Zakir Hossen Shaikh & Naji Mansour Nomran, 2025. "Leveraging Blockchain for Transparency: A Study on Organ Supply Chains and Transplant Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Ma, Chao-Qun & Lei, Yu-Tian & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Chen, Xun-Qi & Wang, Yi-Ran & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Systematic analysis of the blockchain in the energy sector: Trends, issues, and future directions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    14. Narendra Gariya & Anjas Asrani & Adhirath Mandal & Amir Shaikh & Dowan Cha, 2025. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Integrating Blockchain Technology into the Energy Supply Chain for the Enhancement of Transparency and Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Yang Lu & Peixin Zuo & José C. Alves & Jinliang Wang, 2023. "Unlocking the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and international performance: A systematic review," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 464-504, December.
    16. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    17. Leny Vinceslas & Safak Dogan & Srikumar Sundareshwar & Ahmet M. Kondoz, 2023. "Abstracting Data in Distributed Ledger Systems for Higher Level Analytics and Visualizations," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Desveaud, Kathleen & Mandler, Timo & Eisend, Martin, 2024. "A meta-model of customer brand loyalty and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Matthias Fabian Gregersen Trischler & Jason Li-Ying, 2023. "Digital business model innovation: toward construct clarity and future research directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 3-32, January.
    20. Chakraborty, Debarun & Polisetty, Aruna & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Consumers' continuance intention towards metaverse-based virtual stores: A multi-study perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05251774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.