IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists

  • Mark Blaug

No abstract is available for this item.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jep.15.1.145
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by American Economic Association in its journal Journal of Economic Perspectives.

Volume (Year): 15 (2001)
Issue (Month): 1 (Winter)
Pages: 145-164

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:aea:jecper:v:15:y:2001:i:1:p:145-164
Note: DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.1.145
Contact details of provider: Web page: https://www.aeaweb.org/jep/Email:


More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: https://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Vaughn, Karen I., 1993. "Why Teach the History of Economics?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(02), pages 174-183, September.
  2. John Pullen, 1998. "The Last Sixty-Five Years of Malthus Scholarship," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 343-352, Summer.
  3. Wible James, 1998. "The Economics Of Science, Methodology And Epistemology As If Economics Really Matter," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 18, December.
  4. Elias L. Khalil, 1995. "Has Economics Progressed? Rectilinear, Historicist, Universalist, and Evolutionary Historiographies," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 43-87, Spring.
  5. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1971. "After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 225-237, Fall.
  6. Backhouse, Roger E., 1992. "How Should We Approach the History of Economic Thought, Fact, Fiction or Moral Tale?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(01), pages 18-35, March.
  7. Barber, William J., 1967. "A History of Economic Thought," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number barber1967.
  8. Usher, Dan, 1998. "The Coase theorem is tautological, incoherent or wrong," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 3-11, October.
  9. Krueger, Anne O, et al, 1991. "Report of the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 1035-53, September.
  10. Blaug, M., 1998. "Misunderstanding Classical Economics - The Sraffian Interpretation of the Surplus Approach," Discussion Papers 9802, Exeter University, Department of Economics.
  11. Mayer, Thomas, 1980. "David Hume and Monetarism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 95(1), pages 89-101, August.
  12. William D. Grampp, 2000. "What Did Smith Mean by the Invisible Hand?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(3), pages 441-465, June.
  13. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1996. "Nobel Lecture: Monetary Neutrality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(4), pages 661-82, August.
  14. Blaug, Mark, 1990. "On the Historiography of Economics," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(01), pages 27-37, March.
  15. Barber, William J., 1990. "Does Scholarship in the History of Economics Have a Useful Future?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(02), pages 110-123, September.
  16. Bernard A. Corry, 1975. "Should Economists Abandon HOPE?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 252-260, Summer.
  17. Lowry, S. Todd, 1991. "Are there Limits to the Past in the History of Economic Thought?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(02), pages 134-143, September.
  18. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521641739 is not listed on IDEAS
  19. Keith Tribe, 1999. "Adam Smith: Critical Theorist?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(2), pages 609-632, June.
  20. Samuelson, Paul A. & Patinkin, Don & Blaug, Mark, 1991. "On the Historiography of Economics: A Correspondence," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(02), pages 144-158, September.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:jecper:v:15:y:2001:i:1:p:145-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jane Voros)

or (Michael P. Albert)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.