IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ack/journl/y2026id1202.html

USA leading regional centers of technological entrepreneurship in artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Danil V. Bashmakov

Abstract

The article is devoted to the US leading regional centers of technological entrepreneurship in artificial intelligence and their advantages for AI-startups developing. The history of 45 AI-startups that achieved the status of “unicorn companies†between 2022 and 2024 was studied. The focus was on the local context for the successful development of these companies, including: infrastructure and a market of specialized AI industry providers; talented specialists interested in developing AI-solutions; venture capital market and sales opportunities. Startups benefit from the latest technological solutions for creating AI products, strong teams, partner’s support and the ability to scale quickly. Five regions were identified, in which the transformation of AI-startups into a unicorn companies was observed. The leader among them is Silicon Valley, where more than 70% of such transformations have occurred. New York ranks second with a similar indicator of 15%. The other regions are Boston, Austin, and Seattle. Each region shows its strengths and advantages for local AI startups. The discussion of the results summarizes the regional context in the United States facilitating the stages of a startup’s life cycle before becoming a “unicorn company†. The possibilities for implementing the successful experience of developing U.S. AI entrepreneurship in Russia are identified. In particular, three pressing challenges for Russia that are successfully solved in the American economy are identified: diversification of national production through increasing productivity based on AI technologies; expansion of national consumer market and the share of the middle class in the population due to AI projects in the “long tail†digital economy; and the involvement of incumbents represented by large public companies in the development of science, education and ecosystems of AI entrepreneurship.

Suggested Citation

  • Danil V. Bashmakov, 2026. "USA leading regional centers of technological entrepreneurship in artificial intelligence," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 29(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1202
    DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(2)-163-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1202/684
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(2)-163-177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elaine Romanelli & Olga M. Khessina, 2005. "Regional Industrial Identity: Cluster Configurations and Economic Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 344-358, August.
    2. Zemtsov, S., 2022. "Technological entrepreneurship as a development factor of Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 53(1), pages 212-223.
    3. Dominik K. Kanbach & Louisa Heiduk & Georg Blueher & Maximilian Schreiter & Alexander Lahmann, 2024. "The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1189-1220, April.
    4. Keith C. Brown & Kenneth W. Wiles, 2015. "In Search of Unicorns: Private IPOs and the Changing Markets for Private Equity Investments and Corporate Control," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 27(3), pages 34-48, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalle Pajunen & Joonas Järvinen, 2018. "To survive or succeed? An analysis of biotechnology firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 757-771, October.
    2. Fabrizio Perretti & Giacomo Negro & Alessandro Lomi, 2008. "E Pluribus Unum : Framing, Matching, and Form Emergence in U.S. Television Broadcasting, 1940--1960," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 533-547, August.
    3. Anniken Grønstad, 2026. "Scoping reviews vis-à-vis systematic reviews and integrative reviews in management research: guidelines for good practice," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 221-250, January.
    4. Tobias Gössling & Konstantinos Pitsakis, 2026. "Regional institutions and place-based practice adoption: the forest stewardship council certificate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1513-1540, May.
    5. Luca Matteo Zagni & Gabriele Baima & Binh Do & Lam Duc Xuan Nguyen, 2026. "Convergence and divergence in digital game-based advertising: a systematic review of advergames and in-game advertising," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-534, February.
    6. Vestal, Alex & Danneels, Erwin, 2018. "Knowledge exchange in clusters: The contingent role of regional inventive concentration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1887-1903.
    7. Xiaoyue Lin & Tiandong Wang & Fan Sheng, 2025. "Exploring the dual effect of trust in GAI on employees’ exploitative and exploratory innovation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Bevilacqua, Simone & Ferraris, Alberto & Matzler, Kurt & Kuděj, Michal, 2026. "Strategic leadership at high altitude: Investigating how AI affects the required skills of top managers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Keld Laursen & Francesca Masciarelli, 2007. "The effect of regional social capital and external knowledge acquisition on process and product innovation," ROCK Working Papers 043, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 12 Jun 2008.
    10. Hu, Chenguang & Li, Jiatao & Yun, Kyung Hwan, 2023. "Re-examining foreign subsidiary survival in a transition economy: Impact of market identity overlap and conflict," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(3).
    11. Cristian Negrutiu, 2022. "Determinants of Venture Capital Investments in Tech Start-UPS," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 25(84), pages 31-40, December,.
    12. Gilbert, Brett Anitra, 2012. "Creative destruction: Identifying its geographic origins," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 734-742.
    13. Michelle Gittelman, 2007. "Does Geography Matter for Science-Based Firms? Epistemic Communities and the Geography of Research and Patenting in Biotechnology," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 724-741, August.
    14. Jiatao Li & Yi Tang, 2013. "The Social Influence of Executive Hubris," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 83-107, February.
    15. Manuel Portugal Ferreira & Fernando Ribeiro Serra & Benny Kramer Costa & Emerson Maccari & Hergos Couto, 2013. "Impact of the types of clusters on the innovation output and the appropriation of rents from innovation," Working Papers 102, globADVANTAGE, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria.
    16. Luo, Lingli & Ma, Xufei & Makino, Shige & Shinkle, George A., 2020. "Cluster status and new venture creation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    17. Pamela S. Tolbert & Robert J. David & Wesley D. Sine, 2011. "Studying Choice and Change: The Intersection of Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1332-1344, October.
    18. Pulles, Niels J. & Schiele, Holger, 2013. "Social Capital Determinants of Preferential Resource Allocation in Regional Clusters," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 24(2), pages 96-113.
    19. Bischoff, Thore Sören & Hipp, Ann & Runst, Petrik, 2022. "Firm innovation and generalized trust as a regional resource," ifh Working Papers 32/2022, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    20. Gu, Flora F. & Leung, Fine F. & Wang, Danny T. & Tang, Yi, 2024. "Navigating the Double-Edged Sword: Executive hubris and its impact on customer acquisition and retention," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 362-382.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.