IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ach/journl/y2018id675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the industrial potential the Arctic regions

Author

Listed:
  • V. A. Tsukerman
  • E. S. Goryachevskaya

Abstract

The conceptual apparatus associated with the industrial potential of the regions is considered. Taking into account the specific living conditions of the population and economic activity in the Arctic, the methodology for estimating the production, financial, human and infrastructural potential of the Arctic regions for 2013–2016 is chosen.As a result of the analysis, it was determined that strong differentiation is observed in the components of the industrial potential in the regions of theArctic. Tendencies of change of separate indicators by regions for 2013–2016 have been revealed.Ranking of the Arctic regions by the integral index of development of industrial potential allowed to determine that the best indicators are characteristic for the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District and theMurmanskregion. Chukotka AD on industrial potential takes the last place. The importance of assessing the level of industrial potential for the innovative development of the Arctic regions is shown. Further research is required to improve the methodology for assessing the industrial potential of the territories. The assessment allows to correct strategic directions of innovative development of specific regions. The methodology used can be used with appropriate adjustments to assess the industrial potential of northern and other subjects of theRussian Federation.

Suggested Citation

  • V. A. Tsukerman & E. S. Goryachevskaya, 2018. "Assessment of the industrial potential the Arctic regions," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2018:id:675
    DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2018-2-195-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/viewFile/675/611
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17073/2072-1633-2018-2-195-200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Godin, Benoit, 2004. "The New Economy: what the concept owes to the OECD," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 679-690, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    2. Wysokinska Zofia Maria, 2008. "Catching-Up Strategy: New Member States of the European Union in the European Internal Market for High-Tech and Environmental Products in the Context of the Renewed Lisbon Strategy," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Otto Raspe & Frank Van Oort, 2006. "The Knowledge Economy and Urban Economic Growth," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(9), pages 1209-1234, May.
    4. Paul Bishop, 2008. "Spatial Spillovers And The Growth Of Knowledge Intensive Services," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(3), pages 281-292, July.
    5. Alonso Rodríguez-Navarro & Ricardo Brito, 2022. "The link between countries’ economic and scientific wealth has a complex dependence on technological activity and research policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2871-2896, May.
    6. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl & Lukas Lengauer, 2008. "Towards Regional Knowledge Economies: Routes and Policy Options," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2008_05, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    7. Saif Al Weshahi, 2023. "The Perspectives of Academic Leaders on Positioning Higher Education for the Knowledge Economy in Oman: Challenges and Opportunities," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, February.
    8. Matthijs J Janssen & Joeri Wesseling & Jonas Torrens & K Matthias & Caetano Penna & Laurens Klerkx, 2023. "Missions as boundary objects for transformative change: understanding coordination across policy, research, and stakeholder communities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 398-415.
    9. del Portillo, Inigo & Eiskowitz, Skylar & Crawley, Edward F. & Cameron, Bruce G., 2021. "Connecting the other half: Exploring options for the 50% of the population unconnected to the internet," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3).
    10. Kenneth Carlaw & Les Oxley & Paul Walker & David Thorns & Michael Nuth, 2006. "Beyond The Hype: Intellectual Property And The Knowledge Society/Knowledge Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 633-690, September.
    11. Frank Van Oort & Otto Raspe, 2005. "The knowledge economy and Dutch cities," ERSA conference papers ersa05p165, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Henriques, Luisa & Larédo, Philippe, 2013. "Policy-making in science policy: The ‘OECD model’ unveiled," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 801-816.
    13. Chandra, Yanto & Coviello, Nicole, 2010. "Broadening the concept of international entrepreneurship: 'Consumers as International Entrepreneurs'," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 228-236, July.
    14. Paul Jackson & Jochen Runde & Philip Dobson & Nancy Richter, 2016. "Identifying mechanisms influencing the emergence and success of innovation within national economies: a realist approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(3), pages 233-256, September.
    15. Godin, Benoit, 2007. "Science, accounting and statistics: The input-output framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1388-1403, November.
    16. Boothby, Daniel & Dufour, Anik & Tang, Jianmin, 2010. "Technology adoption, training and productivity performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 650-661, June.
    17. Davut Emrah Ayan & Laurel L. Haak & Donna K. Ginther, 2023. "How many people in the world do research and development?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 270-287, May.
    18. Godin, Benoit, 2004. "The obsession for competitiveness and its impact on statistics: the construction of high-technology indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1217-1229, October.
    19. Jadranka Švarc & Marina Dabić, 2017. "Evolution of the Knowledge Economy: a Historical Perspective with an Application to the Case of Europe," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(1), pages 159-176, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2018:id:675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Главный контакт редакции (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://misis.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.