IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ach/journl/y2017id544.html

Complex method for investment climate and unsystematic investment risk analysis

Author

Listed:
  • G. A. Aleksandrov

  • I. V. Vyakina

  • G. G. Skvortsova

Abstract

The paper describes the author’s methodology and information system for the investment climate and unsystematic investment risk analysis of national economies, territories, industries and enterprises. It proposed an analytical tool, which includes three interrelated elements: a matrix, the algorithm and the program, which is designed for the analysis of groups of factors and individual factors in each of the groups in their impact on the investment climate and as a result to develop diversification measures to reduce risks and increase the attractiveness of the investment, and at all levels of the economic hierarchy. Development, description and formalization of decision support system based on the original algorithm and the method for investment climate factors and investment risk analysis and the discount rate determination. The study directs at – consideration of methods for making investment decisions and determining investment risks on different economic levels, based on industry characteristics,– description of a new approach to the diagnosis of the investment climate with the authors’ «AVS-matrix»,– development of an advanced algorithm and a step by step method of investment risk (risk premium) determining in the system of «quotient-risk»,– description of a computer program realizing the author’s technique and decision support system, the formalization of subjective perception of objective quantitative risk assessments: Methodological basis of the studies are traditional methods of scientific analysis, economic and mathematical statistics, technical, economic and logical analysis, graphic and economic and mathematical modeling, etc. The advanced algorithm, step by step methodology and decision support system for investment climate and unsystematic investment risk assessment were described and formalized in the paper. Author’s certificate of software product state registration No. 2015663672 «The program for assess investment climate and unsystematic investment risk assessment» was obtained. The use of author’s technique will significantly reduce the role of the subjective factor in expert estimates and uncertainty factors, will improve the validity and reliability of the investment climate and investment risks assessments, and will help to make an adequate decision about risks elimination.

Suggested Citation

  • G. A. Aleksandrov & I. V. Vyakina & G. G. Skvortsova, 2017. "Complex method for investment climate and unsystematic investment risk analysis," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, issue 3.
    • Handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2017:id:544
    DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2016-3-230-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/viewFile/544/507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17073/2072-1633-2016-3-230-240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Alesina & Silvia Ardagna & Giuseppe Nicoletti & Fabio Schiantarelli, 2005. "Regulation And Investment," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 3(4), pages 791-825, June.
    2. Colen, Liesbeth & Persyn, Damiaan & Guariso, Andrea, 2016. "Bilateral Investment Treaties and FDI: Does the Sector Matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 193-206.
    3. Andrade, Tiago, 2014. "The impact of regulation, privatization and competition on gas infrastructure investments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 82-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacques Pelkmans & Andrea Renda, "undated". "Does EU Regulation Hinder or Stimulate Innovation?," IRMO Occasional Papers 5, Institute for Development and International Relations, Zagreb.
    2. Balázs Égert, 2018. "Regulation, Institutions and Aggregate Investment: New Evidence from OECD Countries," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 415-449, April.
    3. repec:diw:diwwpp:dp1674 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Steven Bond‐Smith, 2022. "Discretely innovating: The effect of limited market contestability on innovation and growth," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 69(3), pages 301-327, July.
    5. Balazs Egert, 2022. "Public policy reforms and their impact on productivity, investment and employment: new evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 46(2), pages 179-205.
    6. Christos Agiakloglou & Michael Polemis, 2018. "Evaluating the liberalization process on Telecommunications services for EU countries," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 98-107.
    7. Vahagn Jerbashian & Anna Kochanova, 2016. "The impact of doing business regulations on investments in ICT," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 991-1008, May.
    8. Forni, L. & Gerali, A. & Pisani, M., 2010. "Macroeconomic Effects Of Greater Competition In The Service Sector: The Case Of Italy," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(5), pages 677-708, November.
    9. Crescioli, Tommaso, 2024. "Reinforcing each other: how the combination of European and domestic reforms increased competition in liberalized industries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123605, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Lindemann, Henrik, 2015. "Does Regulatory Independence Translate into a Higher Degree of Liberalization? - Evidence from EU Energy Regulators," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-545, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    11. Fabiano Schivardi & Eliana Viviano, 2007. "Entry barriers in Italian retail trade," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 616, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    12. Marino, Marianna & Parrotta, Pierpaolo & Valletta, Giacomo, 2019. "Electricity (de)regulation and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 748-758.
    13. Amendolagine, Vito & Prota, Francesco, 2021. "Bilateral investment treaties and backward linkages in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 172-185.
    14. Lucifora, Claudio & Moriconi, Simone, 2015. "Political instability and labour market institutions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 201-221.
    15. Li, Chen, 2016. "Signing a Bilateral Investment Treaty - A tradeoff between investment protection and regulation," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145505, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Paulo Júlio & Ricardo Pinheiro-Alves & José Tavares, 2011. "FDI and institutional reform in Portugal," GEE Papers 0040, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Sep 2011.
    17. Da Rin, Marco & Di Giacomo, Marina & Sembenelli, Alessandro, 2011. "Entrepreneurship, firm entry, and the taxation of corporate income: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 1048-1066.
    18. Adnan Hamid & Nina Silvana, 2025. "The impact of the constitutional court decision number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 concerning law number 6 of 2023 on national investment growth in Indonesia," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(1), pages 204-221, January.
    19. Janos Varga & Werner Roeger & Jan in’t Veld, 2014. "Growth effects of structural reforms in Southern Europe: the case of Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 323-363, May.
    20. Han, Yonghui & Cheng, Hao & Wang, Hao, 2025. "How bilateral investment treaties affect cross-border mergers and acquisitions: Novel evidence from China's internationalization," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    21. Andrea Cintolesi & Sauro Mocetti & Giacomo Roma, 2024. "Productivity and entry regulation: evidence from the universe of firms," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1455, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2017:id:544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Главный контакт редакции (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://misis.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.