IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acg/journl/v6y2018i2p10-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of High Yielding Variety of Paddy on Factor Shares in Sivagangai District

Author

Listed:
  • K Meenakshi Sundaram

    (Raja Dorai Singam Government Arts College)

  • A Marimuthu

    (Government Arts College, Melur)

Abstract

In this paper an attempt is made to study the estimate input demand elasticties and supply responsiveness for small and large farmers producing High Yielding Variety (HYV) and Traditional Variety (TV) of paddy. In recent years, technological change has brought about a substantial increase in agricultural output and income in India. The following objectives was farmed to study the impact of new technology on factor shares and to measure the nature of factor biases in technical change. The profit function is inherently a cross-sectional approach. The application of profit function approach is warranted only under conditions of price variations between farms at a point of time. The indirect estimates of production elasticities derived from the Cobb-Douglas production function by using the results. The HYV of paddy cultivation reduces the problem of unemployment in the agricultural sector, particularly in sivagangai district. The present study that the share of land is found to be the maximum for both the varieties. The human labour share in output is observed to be higher for HYV than TV of paddy.

Suggested Citation

  • K Meenakshi Sundaram & A Marimuthu, 2018. "Impact of High Yielding Variety of Paddy on Factor Shares in Sivagangai District," Shanlax International Journal of Economics, Shanlax Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 10-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:acg:journl:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:10-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.shanlaxjournals.in/journals/index.php/economics/article/view/672
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.shanlaxjournals.in/wp-content/uploads/impact_of_high_yielding_variety_of_paddy_on_factor_shares_in_sivagangai_district.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bagi, F. S., 1981. "Economics of Irrigation in Crop Production in Haryana," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 36(3), July.
    2. John C. Quiggin & Anh Bui‐Lan, 1984. "The Use Of Cross‐Sectional Estimates Of Profit Functions For Tests Of Relative Efficiency: A Critical Review," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 28(1), pages 44-55, April.
    3. George, M. V. & Kurian, N. J. & Mohan, C. Chandra, 1983. "Factor Shares in Indian Agriculture: Temporal and Spatial Variations and Their Implications," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 38(3), July.
    4. Binswanger, Hans P, 1974. "The Measurement of Technical Change Biases with Many Factors of Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(6), pages 964-976, December.
    5. Lawrence J. Lau & Pan A. Yotopoulos, 1972. "Profit, Supply, and Factor Demand Functions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(1), pages 11-18.
    6. Alshi, M. R. & Kumar, P. & Mathur, V. C., 1983. "Technological Change and Factor Shares in Cotton Production: A Case Study of Akola Cotton Farms," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 38(3), July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thilmany, Dawn D. & Espey, Molly, 1998. "Farm Labor Demand And Supply: A Meta-Analysis Of Wage Elasticities," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 21001, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Noel Uri, 2001. "Telecommunications in the United States and Changing Productive Efficiency," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 321-335, September.
    3. Beatriz Muriel & Carlos Gustavo Machicado, 2012. "Employment and Labor Regulation: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms in Bolivia, 1988-2007," Development Research Working Paper Series 07/2012, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
    4. Uri, Noel D., 2001. "Technical efficiency, allocative efficiency, and the impact of incentive regulation in telecommunications in the United States," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 59-73, March.
    5. Tasso Adamopoulos & Diego Restuccia, 2014. "The Size Distribution of Farms and International Productivity Differences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(6), pages 1667-1697, June.
    6. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    7. Noel Uri, 2003. "The Effect of Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications in the United States," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 169-191, May.
    8. Meena, P.C. & Kumar, P. & Reddy, G.P., 2010. "Factor Demand and Output Supply of Wheat in Western India," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 65(4), pages 1-8.
    9. Zhang, Wei & Alston, Julian M., 2013. "Factor Substitution and Technical Change in the U.S. Dairy Processing and Manufacturing Industry," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150707, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Shoemaker, Robbin, 1986. "Effects of Changes in U.S. Agricultural Production on Demand for Farm Inputs," Technical Bulletins 157024, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Lachaal, Lassaad & Chebil, Ali & Dhehibi, Boubaker, 2005. "Measuring factor substitution and technological change in the Tunisian agricultural sector, 1971 - 2000," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11.
    12. Ijaz Nabi, 1984. "Issues in the Economics of Industrialization in Developing Countries: A Case Study from Pakistan's Light Engineering Sector," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 23(2-3), pages 311-329.
    13. Hildreth, R.J. & Bentley, Orville G. & Johnson, Glenn L. & Tweeten, Luther & Mellor, John W. & Bromley, Daniel W. & Pope, Rulon D. & Leman, Christopher K. & Paarlberg, Robert L. & King, R.P. & Sonka, , 1985. "Agriculture and Rural Areas Approaching the Twenty-first Century: Challenges for Agricultural Economics," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278707, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Yucan Liu & C. Richard Shumway, 2009. "Induced Innovation in U.S. Agriculture: Time-series, Direct Econometric, and Nonparametric Tests," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(1), pages 224-236.
    15. Antle, John M. & Aitah, Ali S., 1984. "Egypt'S Multiproduct Agricultural Technology And Agricultural Policy," Working Papers 225790, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Mellander, Erik, 1991. "An Indirect Approach to Measuring Productivity in Private Services," Working Paper Series 300, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised Mar 1992.
    17. Coleman, Jane A. & Shaik, Saleem, 2009. "Time-Varying Estimation of Crop Insurance Program in Altering North Dakota Farm Economic Structure," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49516, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Perrin, Richard K. & Fulginiti, Lilyan E., 1998. "Technological Change And Welfare In An Economy With Distortions," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 21013, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Edward Kokkelenberg & Sang Nguyen, 1989. "Modeling technical progress and total factor productivity: A plant level example," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 21-42, March.
    20. Napasintuwong, Orachos & Emerson, Robert D., 2003. "Farm Mechanization And The Farm Labor Market: A Socioeconomic Model Of Induced Innovation," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35117, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acg:journl:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:10-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: S.Lakshmanan (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.