Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Controlling For Heterogeneity And Asymmetry In Cross-Section Gravity Models Of Aggregate Migration: Evidence From Mexico

Contents:

Author Info

  • Ludo Peeters

    ()

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The standard gravity model of aggregate migration erroneously assumes homogeneity, quasi-symmetry, and (log) linearity. As a result, estimation of the model using, say, the convenient OLS estimator is plagued by omitted-variables and misspecification biases. This paper, therefore, presents estimates for a cross-section gravity model controlling for unobserved unilateral (origin-/destination-specific) and bilateral (flow-specific) effects. Individual slopes on the bilateral linkage factors have been included to account for potentially correlated heterogeneity in the bilateral dimension that is distinctively related to distance, contiguity, and previous migration (migrant stock), respectively. To implement the model, I use a novel “three-way” fixed-effects type of Generalized Maximum Entropy estimator (FE-GME). The importance of fixed effects is demonstrated by comparing the FE-GME results with those obtained from OLS. The model is applied for an exploratory analysis of cross-sectional data on inter-state migration in Mexico during the period 1995-2000. It is found that accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in all three dimensions results in appreciably lower magnitudes of all coefficients (except the one on distance!), while most of them retain their statistical significance. Moreover, including bilateral fixed-effects is found to be instrumental in keeping with arbitrary heteroskedasticity, even if the gravity model is specified in its conventional double-log form.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa10/ERSA2010finalpaper329.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa10p329.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Sep 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p329

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
    Web page: http://www.ersa.org

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Cushing, Brian J, 1986. "Accounting for Spatial Relationships in Models of Interstate Population Migration," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 66-73, July.
    2. Scott L. Baier & Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, 2005. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?," Working Paper 2005-03, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    3. Bruder, Jana, 2003. "East-West Migration in Europe, 2004 - 2015," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 40, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    4. I-Hui Cheng & Howard J. Wall, 2005. "Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Jan, pages 49-63.
    5. Taylor, J. Edward & Mora, Jorge & Adams, Richard H., Jr. & Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro, 2005. "Remittances, Inequality and Poverty: Evidence from Rural Mexico," Working Papers 60287, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Golan, Amos & Judge, George G. & Miller, Douglas, 1996. "Maximum Entropy Econometrics," Staff General Research Papers 1488, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Quirino Paris & Richard E. Howitt, 1998. "An Analysis of Ill-Posed Production Problems Using Maximum Entropy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(1), pages 124-138.
    8. Shioji, Etsuro, 2001. "Composition Effect of Migration and Regional Growth in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 29-49, March.
    9. Bauer, Thomas K. & Epstein, Gil S. & Gang, Ira N., 2002. "Herd Effects or Migration Networks? The Location Choice of Mexican Immigrants in the U.S," IZA Discussion Papers 551, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
    10. Laurent Calvet & Etienne Comon, 2003. "Behavioral Heterogeneity and the Income Effect," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(3), pages 653-669, August.
    11. Shen, Edward Z. & Perloff, Jeffrey M., 2001. "Maximum entropy and Bayesian approaches to the ratio problem," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 289-313, September.
    12. Thierry Warin & Andrew Blakely, 2009. "Choice or Mimetism in the Decision to Migrate? A European Illustration," CIRANO Working Papers 2009s-38, CIRANO.
    13. Richard C. Jones, 2001. "Maquiladoras and U.S.-Bound Migration in Central Mexico," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 32(2), pages 193-216.
    14. Michael Greenwood & Jerry Ladman & Barry Siegel, 1981. "Long-Term Trends In Migratory Behavior In A Developing Country: The Case of Mexico," Demography, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 369-388, August.
    15. Amos Golan & Esfandiar Maasoumi, 2008. "Information Theoretic and Entropy Methods: An Overview," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4-6), pages 317-328.
    16. Peter Mueser, 1989. "Measuring the impact of locational characteristics on migration: Interpreting cross-sectional analyses," Demography, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 499-513, August.
    17. Dunlevy, James A & Gemery, Henry A, 1977. "The Role of Migrant Stock and Lagged Migration in the Settlement Patterns of Nineteenth Century Immigrants," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 59(2), pages 137-44, May.
    18. Golan, Amos, 2007. "Information and entropy econometrics - volume overview and synthesis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 379-387, June.
    19. J. Ulyses Balderas & Michael Greenwood, 2010. "From Europe to the Americas: a comparative panel-data analysis of migration to Argentina, Brazil, and the United States, 1870–1910," Journal of Population Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1301-1318, September.
    20. Dunlevy, James A, 1993. "Migrant Stock vs. Lagged Migrant Flow as a Determinant of Migrant Settlement: A Comment," Journal of Population Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 181-88, May.
    21. Pedersen, Peder J. & Pytlikova, Mariola & Smith, Nina, 2008. "Selection and network effects--Migration flows into OECD countries 1990-2000," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 1160-1186, October.
    22. Combes, Pierre-Philippe & Duranton, Gilles & Gobillon, Laurent, 2008. "Spatial wage disparities: Sorting matters!," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 723-742, March.
    23. Swamy, P A V B & Tavlas, George S, 1995. " Random Coefficient Models: Theory and Applications," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 165-96, June.
    24. Schwartz, Aba, 1973. "Interpreting the Effect of Distance on Migration," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(5), pages 1153-69, Sept.-Oct.
    25. Jeremiah M. Allen & B. Curtis Eaton, 2005. "Incomplete Information and Migration: the Grass is Greener Across the Higher Fence," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 1-19.
    26. Cole, William E. & Sanders, Richard D., 1983. "Interstate migration in Mexico : Variations on the Todaro theme," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 341-354, June.
    27. James Raymer & Andrei Rogers, 2007. "Using age and spatial flow structures in the indirect estimation of migration streams," Demography, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 199-223, May.
    28. Peter Egger, 2005. "Alternative Techniques for Estimation of Cross-Section Gravity Models," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 881-891, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa10p329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.