Are Sunk Costs Irrelevant? Evidence from Playing Time in the National Basketball Association
AbstractThe importance of sunk costs in economic decision making is a major source of disagreement between neoclassical and behavioral economists. We provide a direct test of the role played by sunk costs using evidence from the National Basketball Association. Because teams have a greater financial and psychic stake in players chosen in the lottery portion of the draft and in the draftâ€™s first round, behavioral economists predict that teams are more committed to them than to players selected later in the draft and give these players more playing time. Neoclassical economists would assert that current performance should be all that matters when allocating playing time. Our study builds on previous studies in two ways. First, we use a more appropriate data set than earlier studies, one that captures total available playing time more accurately than previous studies by accounting for time lost due to injury, suspension, and other exogenous factors. Second and more importantly, we use a more appropriate estimation technique --- regression discontinuity (RD) --- to show how behavior changes when a player's draft position crosses the threshold between lottery and non-lottery or first- and second-round status. Our RD estimates provide little evidence that teams allocate more playing time to more highly-drafted players than to otherwise identical teammates. We conclude that the neoclassical model more appropriately captures behavior.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Department of Economics, Temple University in its series DETU Working Papers with number 1304.
Date of creation: Nov 2013
Date of revision:
competition; middlemen; ambiguity; platform; two-sided market; market intermediation;
Other versions of this item:
- Leeds, Daniel & Leeds, Michael A. & Motomura, Akira, 2013. "Are Sunk Costs Irrelevant? Evidence from Playing Time in the National Basketball Association," IZA Discussion Papers 7801, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics; Underlying Principles
- J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
- L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
Blog mentionsAs found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
- Are NBA coaches behavioral or neoclassical?
by Economic Logician in Economic Logic on 2014-01-17 15:45:00
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dimitrios Diamantaras).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.