IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/psc803.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Renke Schmacker

Personal Details

First Name:Renke
Middle Name:
Last Name:Schmacker
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:psc803
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://rschmacker.github.io/

Affiliation

Faculté des Hautes Études Commerciales (HEC)
Université de Lausanne

Lausanne, Switzerland
http://www.hec.unil.ch/
RePEc:edi:heclsch (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Rustamdjan Hakimov & Renke Schmacker & Camille Terrier, 2023. "Confidence and College Applications: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 377, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  2. Camille Terrier & Rustamdjan Hakimov & Renke Schmacker, 2023. "Confiance en soi et choix d’orientation sur Parcoursup : Enseignements d’une intervention randomisée," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-04164914, HAL.
  3. Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2022. "Preferences for Sin Taxes," CESifo Working Paper Series 10046, CESifo.
  4. Renke Schmacker & Sinne Smed, 2020. "Sin Taxes and Self-Control," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1881, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  5. Grohmann, Antonia & Menkhoff, Lukas & Merkle, Christoph & Schmacker, Renke, 2019. "Earn More Tomorrow: Overconfident Income Expectations and Consumer Indebtedness," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 152, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  6. König, Tobias & Kübler, Dorothea & Mechtenberg, Lydia & Schmacker, Renke, 2019. "Fair Procedures with Naive Agents: Who Wants the Boston Mechanism?," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 222, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  7. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  8. Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Softdrinksteuer: Proportionale Steuer ist der vielversprechendste Ansatz," DIW aktuell 10, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  9. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo.
  10. Renke Schmacker, 2016. "Eine Softdrinksteuer zur fiskalischen Konsumsteuerung," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 103, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

Articles

  1. Renke Schmacker & Sinne Smed, 2023. "Sin Taxes and Self-Control," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-34, August.
  2. Castagnetti, Alessandro & Schmacker, Renke, 2022. "Protecting the ego: Motivated information selection and updating," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
  3. Renke Schmacker, 2020. "Zuckersteuern können zu einer gesünderen Ernährung beitragen: Kommentar," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(12), pages 248-248.
  4. Schmacker, Renke & Smed, Sinne, 2020. "Do prices and purchases respond similarly to soft drink tax increases and cuts?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
  5. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Fear of Stigmatization Prevents Individuals from Claiming Benefits," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 9(26/27), pages 215-220.
  6. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Die Angst vor Stigmatisierung hindert Menschen daran, Transferleistungen in Anspruch zu nehmen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(26), pages 455-461.
  7. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2022. "Preferences for Sin Taxes," CESifo Working Paper Series 10046, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Hermes, Henning & Bartling, Björn & Cappelen, Alexander & Skivenes, Marit & Tungodden, Bertil, 2023. "Free to Fail? Paternalistic Preferences in the United States," CEPR Discussion Papers 18156, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

  2. Renke Schmacker & Sinne Smed, 2020. "Sin Taxes and Self-Control," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1881, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Dickson, Alex & Gehrsitz, Markus & Kemp, Jonathan, 2021. "Does a Spoonful of Sugar Levy Help the Calories Go Down? An Analysis of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy," IZA Discussion Papers 14528, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  3. Grohmann, Antonia & Menkhoff, Lukas & Merkle, Christoph & Schmacker, Renke, 2019. "Earn More Tomorrow: Overconfident Income Expectations and Consumer Indebtedness," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 152, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Friehe, Tim & Pannenberg, Markus, 2021. "Time preferences and overconfident beliefs: Evidence from germany," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Niklas Gohl & Peter Haan & Claus Michelsen & Felix Weinhardt, 2022. "House Price Expectations," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1994, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Gohl, Niklas & Haan, Peter & Michelsen, Claus & Weinhardt, Felix, 2022. "House Price Expectations," IZA Discussion Papers 15040, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  4. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Jia, Z. Tingting & McMahon, Matthew J., 2020. "Being watched in an investment game setting: Behavioral changes when making risky decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Le, Huong Thu & Connelly, Luke B., 2020. "Who’s declining the “free lunch”? New evidence from the uptake of public child dental benefits," GLO Discussion Paper Series 501, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Jan Marcus & Thomas Siedler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2021. "The Long-Run Effects of Sports Club Vouchers for Primary School Children," CEPA Discussion Papers 34, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Pablo A. Celhay & Bruce D. Meyer & Nikolas Mittag, 2022. "Stigma in Welfare Programs," NBER Working Papers 30307, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Germain, Antoine, 2023. "Basic income versus fairness: redistribution with inactive agents," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2023022, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Spencer Bastani & Thomas Giebe & Chizheng Miao, 2019. "Ethnicity and tax filing behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 7576, CESifo.
    7. DELIS, Manthos & GALARIOTIS, Emilios & IOSIFIDI, Maria & MONNE, Jerome, 2023. "Poverty and seeking bank advice: Evidence from a survey experiment," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Osman, Adam & Speer, Jamin D., 2023. "Stigma and Take-up of Labor Market Assistance: Evidence from Two Field Experiments," IZA Discussion Papers 16599, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Delis, Manthos & Galariotis, Emilios & Monne, Jerome, 2021. "Financial vulnerability and seeking expert advice: Evidence from a survey experiment," MPRA Paper 107095, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Adam Osman & Jamin D. Speer, 2024. "Stigma and take‐up of labour market assistance: Evidence from two field experiments," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(361), pages 123-141, January.
    11. Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Truger, Achim & Wieland, Volker, 2019. "Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20 [Dealing with Structural Change. Annual Report 2019/20]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201920.
    12. Wolf, Tobias, 2020. "Welfare while working: How does the life satisfaction approach help to explain job search behavior?," Discussion Papers 2020/14, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    13. Reanos, Miguel Tovar & Curtis, John & Pillai, Arya & Meier, David, 2023. "Fuel poverty and financial literacy: Evidence from Irish home owners," Papers WP751, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).

  5. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Cameron, Anna & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2021. "Gender-Based Violence, Economic Security, and the Potential of Basic Income: A Discussion Paper," MPRA Paper 107478, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Tedds, Lindsay M. & Crisan, I. Daria & Petit, Gillian, 2020. "Basic Income in Canada: Principles and Design Features," MPRA Paper 105911, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Articles

  1. Renke Schmacker & Sinne Smed, 2023. "Sin Taxes and Self-Control," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-34, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Castagnetti, Alessandro & Schmacker, Renke, 2022. "Protecting the ego: Motivated information selection and updating," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).

    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Coutts & Boon Han Koh & Zahra Murad, 2024. "The signals we give: Performance feedback, gender, and competition," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2024-02, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
    2. Jantsje M. Mol & Ivan Soraperra & Joël J. van der Weele, 2023. "Spoiling the party. Experimental evidence on the willingness to transmit inconvenient ethical information," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-062/I, Tinbergen Institute.

  3. Schmacker, Renke & Smed, Sinne, 2020. "Do prices and purchases respond similarly to soft drink tax increases and cuts?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).

    Cited by:

    1. Renke Schmacker & Sinne Smed, 2020. "Sin Taxes and Self-Control," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1881, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Yann Le Bodo & Fabrice Etilé & Chantal Julia & Marine Friant-Perrot & Eric Breton & Sébastien Lecocq & Christine Boizot-Szantai & Céline Bergeran & Françoise Jabot, 2022. "Public health lessons from the French 2012 soda tax and insights on the modifications enacted in 2018," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03673111, HAL.
    3. Sidse Marie Sidenius Bestle & Bodil Just Christensen & Ellen Trolle & Anja Pia Biltoft-Jensen & Jeppe Matthiessen & Sarah Jegsmark Gibbons & Bjarne Kjær Ersbøll & Anne Dahl Lassen, 2020. "Reducing Young Schoolchildren’s Intake of Sugar-Rich Food and Drinks: Study Protocol and Intervention Design for “Are You Too Sweet?” A Multicomponent 3.5-Month Cluster Randomised Family-Based Interve," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2022. "Preferences for Sin Taxes," CESifo Working Paper Series 10046, CESifo.
    5. Cawley, John & Frisvold, David, 2023. "Review: Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: Political economy, and effects on prices, purchases, and consumption," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

  4. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 14 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (9) 2017-01-01 2017-11-05 2018-08-13 2018-08-20 2018-08-27 2019-04-29 2021-05-03 2022-12-12 2023-02-06. Author is listed
  2. NEP-PBE: Public Economics (4) 2017-01-01 2020-07-27 2021-05-03 2022-12-12. Author is listed
  3. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (3) 2020-07-27 2021-05-03 2022-12-12
  4. NEP-DES: Economic Design (2) 2021-05-03 2023-02-06
  5. NEP-GER: German Papers (2) 2016-11-06 2018-05-14
  6. NEP-PUB: Public Finance (2) 2020-07-27 2022-12-12
  7. NEP-URE: Urban and Real Estate Economics (2) 2017-11-05 2021-05-03
  8. NEP-AGE: Economics of Ageing (1) 2023-02-06
  9. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (1) 2023-02-06
  10. NEP-HAP: Economics of Happiness (1) 2023-02-06
  11. NEP-LTV: Unemployment, Inequality and Poverty (1) 2023-02-06
  12. NEP-REG: Regulation (1) 2022-12-12
  13. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (1) 2023-02-06

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Renke Schmacker should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.