IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2315-d752125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profit-Sharing Contracts for Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Considering Spatio-Temporal Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Min Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Center of Comprehensive Transportation Economic Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Lina He

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Guangchuan Yang

    (Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

  • Zhen Lian

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

This paper investigated the effects of the informational asymmetry phenomenon that occurs in the direct sale of fresh agricultural products (FAP) in an e-commerce environment. A three-level FAP supply chain was proposed, which was composed of a FAP supplier, a logistics service provider, and a large e-commerce platform. Considering the perishable nature of FAP, this paper analyzed the effects of logistics spatio-temporal costs and the freshness of FAP on the profit of each stakeholder in the supply chain. Three scenarios were considered: (1) complete information, (2) partial information, and (3) considering logistics spatio-temporal cost. Analytical models were developed based on the principal-agent theory and the supply chain coordination contract theory to depict the effects of a profit-sharing contract on the operations of the FAP supply chain. Modeling results indicated that under a complete information condition, an increase in the loss rate of FAP correlated to a decrease in the profit of the FAP supply chain. Under a partial information condition, considering the loss rate of FAP and the potential compensation costs to suppliers, when the loss rate of FAP was fixed, the profit of each stakeholder in the FAP supply chain displayed a decreasing trend in relation to compensation ratio. In comparison, when the compensation ratio was fixed, the total profit decreased as the freshness of the FAP degraded. To improve customer satisfaction, this paper recommends adding a front warehouse to improve the freshness of FAP. Although this option increases the logistics costs, it has the potential of increasing the overall profit of the FAP supply chain. Findings from this research have the potential to help the e-commerce platform with coordinating the various stakeholders on the supply chain to determine the optimal quality and quantity of FAPs, eventually improving the operational efficiency of the FAP direct sales supply chain by reducing the logistics costs of FAP.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Li & Lina He & Guangchuan Yang & Zhen Lian, 2022. "Profit-Sharing Contracts for Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Considering Spatio-Temporal Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2315-:d:752125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriella Dellino & Teresa Laudadio & Renato Mari & Nicola Mastronardi & Carlo Meloni, 2018. "A reliable decision support system for fresh food supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1458-1485, February.
    2. Ömer Özgür Tort & Özalp Vayvay & Emine Çobanoğlu, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Sustainable Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-38, January.
    3. Konstantinos Giannakas, 2002. "Information Asymmetries and Consumption Decisions in Organic Food Product Markets," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(1), pages 35-50, March.
    4. Qian Zheng & Manman Wang & Feng Yang, 2021. "Optimal Channel Strategy for a Fresh Produce E-Commerce Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Avinadav, Tal & Chernonog, Tatyana & Fruchter, Gila E. & Prasad, Ashutosh, 2020. "Contract design when quality is co-created in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 908-918.
    6. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Sterns, James, 2013. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales of Farm Products: Producers and Supply Chains in the Southeast," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45, pages 1-12, August.
    7. David A. Hennessy, 1996. "Information Asymmetry as a Reason for Food Industry Vertical Integration," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(4), pages 1034-1043.
    8. Hung‐Hao Chang & Chad D. Meyerhoefer, 2021. "COVID‐19 and the Demand for Online Food Shopping Services: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 448-465, March.
    9. Ahearn, Mary & Sterns, James, 2013. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales of Farm Products: Producers and Supply Chains in the Southeast," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 497-508, August.
    10. Jabarzare, Nahid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for pricing and determining quality level through coordination contracts in a dual-channel supply chain including manufacturer and packaging company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Hennessy, David A., 1996. "Information Asymmetry As a Reason for Vertical Integration," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10422, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Nader Azad & Georgios Saharidis & Hamid Davoudpour & Hooman Malekly & Seyed Yektamaram, 2013. "Strategies for protecting supply chain networks against facility and transportation disruptions: an improved Benders decomposition approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 125-163, November.
    13. Saoli Chanda & Mahadev Bhat & Kateel G. Shetty & Krishnaswamy Jayachandran, 2021. "Technology, Policy, and Market Adaptation Mechanisms for Sustainable Fresh Produce Industry: The Case of Tomato Production in Florida, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    14. O’Hara, Jeffrey K. & Low, Sarah A., 2020. "Online Sales: A Direct Marketing Opportunity for Rural Farms?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 222-239, May.
    15. Michał Pietrzak & Aleksandra Chlebicka & Paweł Kraciński & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska, 2020. "Information Asymmetry as a Barrier in Upgrading the Position of Local Producers in the Global Value Chain—Evidence from the Apple Sector in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Ronald W. Ward, 1982. "Asymmetry in Retail, Wholesale, and Shipping Point Pricing for Fresh Vegetables," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(2), pages 205-212.
    17. Unnevehr, Laurian J., 2000. "Food safety issues and fresh food product exports from LDCs," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 231-240, September.
    18. Ilkyeong Moon & Yoon Jea Jeong & Subrata Saha, 2020. "Investment and coordination decisions in a supply chain of fresh agricultural products," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2307-2331, December.
    19. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2011. "Marketing-driven channel coordination with revenue-sharing contracts under price promotion to end-customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 246-255, October.
    20. Luca Secondi & Ludovica Principato & Luca Ruini & Matteo Guidi, 2019. "Reusing Food Waste in Food Manufacturing Companies: The Case of the Tomato-Sauce Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    21. Widodo, K.H. & Nagasawa, H. & Morizawa, K. & Ota, M., 2006. "A periodical flowering-harvesting model for delivering agricultural fresh products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 24-43, April.
    22. Yang, Lei & Tang, Ruihong, 2019. "Comparisons of sales modes for a fresh product supply chain with freshness-keeping effort," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 425-448.
    23. Cai, Xiaoqiang & Chen, Jian & Xiao, Yongbo & Xu, Xiaolin & Yu, Gang, 2013. "Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 752-765.
    24. Liu, Molin & Dan, Bin & Zhang, Shuguang & Ma, Songxuan, 2021. "Information sharing in an E-tailing supply chain for fresh produce with freshness-keeping effort and value-added service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 572-584.
    25. Ilenia Zennaro & Serena Finco & Martina Calzavara & Alessandro Persona, 2022. "Implementing E-Commerce from Logistic Perspective: Literature Review and Methodological Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-37, January.
    26. Yu, Yunlong & Xiao, Tiaojun, 2021. "Analysis of cold-chain service outsourcing modes in a fresh agri-product supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    27. Leng, Mingming & Parlar, Mahmut, 2009. "Lead-time reduction in a two-level supply chain: Non-cooperative equilibria vs. coordination with a profit-sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 521-544, April.
    28. Aristotelis Batzios & Achilleas Kontogeorgos & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Panagiota Sergaki, 2021. "What Makes Producers Participate in Marketing Cooperatives? The Northern Greece Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianle Tian & Chuiyong Zheng & Liguo Yang & Xiaochun Luo & Lin Lu, 2022. "Optimal Recycling Channel Selection of Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Corporate Social Responsibility in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Jun Sun & Tianhang Jiang & Yufei Song & Hao Guo & Yushi Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Optimization of Fresh Agricultural Products Trade Distribution Path Based on Genetic Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Min Li & Zhen Lian & Guangchuan Yang & Liaoning Li, 2023. "Profit-Sharing Contract of the Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain under Community Group Purchase Mode Considering Freshness Preservation Efforts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Li & Zhen Lian & Guangchuan Yang & Liaoning Li, 2023. "Profit-Sharing Contract of the Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain under Community Group Purchase Mode Considering Freshness Preservation Efforts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Liu, Chao & Lv, Jingyu & Hou, Ping & Lu, Danrong, 2023. "Disclosing products’ freshness level as a non-contractible quality: Optimal logistics service contracts in the fresh products supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1085-1102.
    3. Qian Zheng & Manman Wang & Feng Yang, 2021. "Optimal Channel Strategy for a Fresh Produce E-Commerce Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Irz, Xavier & Mazzocchi, Mario & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Research in Food Economics: past trends and new challenges," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 187-237, March.
    5. Unterschultz, James R., 2000. "New Instruments For Co-Ordination And Risk Sharing Within The Canadian Beef Industry," Project Report Series 24046, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    6. Resende Filho, Moises de Andrade, 2007. "A Principal-Agent Model for Investigating Traceability Systems Incentives on Food Safety," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7897, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Zhinan Li & Qinming Liu & Chunming Ye & Ming Dong & Yihan Zheng, 2022. "Achieving Resilience: Resilient Price and Quality Strategies of Fresh Food Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering the Disruption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Moisés de Andrade Resende Filho & Brian L. Buhr, 2006. "A Principal-Agent Model For Evaluating The Economic Value Of A Beef Traceability System: A Case Study With Injection-Site Lesions Control In Fed Cattle In The Us," Anais do XXXIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 34th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 127, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    9. Unnevehr, Laurian J. & Jensen, Helen H., 1999. "The economic implications of using HACCP as a food safety regulatory standard," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 625-635, December.
    10. Blend Frangu & Jennie Sheerin Popp & Michael Thomsen & Arben Musliu, 2018. "Evaluating Greenhouse Tomato and Pepper Input Efficiency Use in Kosovo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Goodhue, Rachael E., 1997. "Production Control and Production Contracts: Why Do Integrators Control Inputs?," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35908, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    12. Wille, Stefan Clemens & Barklage, Britta & Spiller, Achim & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie, 2018. "Challenging factors of farmer-to-consumer direct marketing: An empirical analysis of German livestock owners," DARE Discussion Papers 1807, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    13. Li, Xiaokang & Guo, Hongdong & Li, Lin, 2016. "Contract Farming in China: Perspectives of Smallholders in Vegetable Production," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235573, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. O'Hara, Jeffrey K. & Benson, Matthew, 2017. "Local Food Production and Farm to School Expenditures," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252669, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Peng, Chao & Zeng, Yinchu & Huang, Bo & Yabe, Mitsuyasu, 2010. "The contracts between leading agribusiness enterprises and rural households: its effects on firm-level export of agricultural products," MPRA Paper 26499, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Neda Trifković, 2014. "Food Standards and Vertical Coordination in Aquaculture: The Case of Pangasius from Vietnam," IFRO Working Paper 2014/01, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    17. Jingci Xie & Jianjian Liu & Xin Huo & Qingchun Meng & Mengyu Chu, 2021. "Fresh Food Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon and Freshness Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    18. Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy, 2009. "Production and Abatement Distortions under Noisy Green Taxes," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 11(1), pages 37-53, February.
    19. Fang Qiu & Qifan Hu & Bing Xu, 2020. "Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Coordination and Volume Loss Reduction Based on Strategic Consumer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Mungandi, Sepiso & Conforte, Daniel & Shadbolt, Nicola M., 2012. "Integration of Smallholders in Modern Agri-food Chains: Lessons from the KASCOL Model in Zambia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2315-:d:752125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.