IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p5933-d561457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology, Policy, and Market Adaptation Mechanisms for Sustainable Fresh Produce Industry: The Case of Tomato Production in Florida, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Saoli Chanda

    (Department of Earth and Environment, College of Arts, Sciences, and Education, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Mahadev Bhat

    (Department of Earth and Environment, College of Arts, Sciences, and Education, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Kateel G. Shetty

    (Department of Earth and Environment, College of Arts, Sciences, and Education, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Krishnaswamy Jayachandran

    (Department of Earth and Environment, College of Arts, Sciences, and Education, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

Abstract

Tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) is an important vegetable crop in Florida, a state located in the south-eastern region of the United States. The state is the second largest producer of tomatoes in the country and contributes to almost 90% of the domestic winter tomato supplies. However, tomato farmers in Florida have come under increasing pressure due to climate changes, foreign imports, and rising production costs. The purpose of this paper is to analyze whether Florida tomato growers will continue to sustain their production given the seasonal and geographic production advantage, yet against various internal and external threats emerging throughout the fresh produce supply chain. We developed our study on a multi-disciplinary conceptual model of network (supply chain) relationship and primary and secondary data gathered from various stakeholders and the literature. We found that Florida farmers have done remarkably well by adapting to warming temperatures and changing consumer expectations about environmental sustainability and responsible labor practices. However, foreign competition, labor shortage, the rising costs of inputs, extreme weather events (hurricanes), and pests and diseases due to humid climate continue to affect the sustainability of the Florida tomato production. Our paper suggests various farm-, market-, and institution-level adaptation mechanisms for preventing the regional production advantage of the Florida tomato industry from eroding. Newer immigration laws are necessary for easing the labor situation. In order to have a level playing field with respect to the use of protected agriculture technology such as in Mexico and Canada, U.S. farmers in general and Florida farmers in particular need government support. Florida farmers need to diversify their fresh produce market strategies, finding new product streams. There is also a need for reforming the product certification landscape, which some growers find cumbersome and cost prohibitive. Growers may gain from being better able to convey to consumers the information regarding their effort put into environmental sustainability, workers welfare, and safe food.

Suggested Citation

  • Saoli Chanda & Mahadev Bhat & Kateel G. Shetty & Krishnaswamy Jayachandran, 2021. "Technology, Policy, and Market Adaptation Mechanisms for Sustainable Fresh Produce Industry: The Case of Tomato Production in Florida, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5933-:d:561457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5933/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5933/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaufman, Phillip R. & Handy, Charles R. & McLaughlin, Edward W. & Park, Kristen & Green, Geoffrey M., 2000. "Understanding The Dynamics Of Produce Markets: Consumption And Consolidation Grow," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33747, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Dimitri, Carolyn & Tegene, Abebayehu & Kaufman, Phillip R., 2003. "U.S. Fresh Produce Markets: Marketing Channels, Trade Practices, And Retail Pricing Behavior," Agricultural Economic Reports 33907, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Wu, Feng & Qushim, Berdikul & Calle, Marcelo & Guan, Zhengfei, 2018. "Government Support in Mexican Agriculture," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(3), September.
    4. Batie, Sandra S., 1989. "Sustainable Development: Challenges to the Profession of Agricultural Economics," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270686, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Lien, Gudbrand & Brian Hardaker, J. & Flaten, Ola, 2007. "Risk and economic sustainability of crop farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 541-552, May.
    6. Asci, Serhat & VanSickle, John J. & Cantliffe, Daniel J., 2013. "The Potential for Greenhouse Tomato Production Expansion in Florida," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 143095, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Wu, Feng & Guan, Zhengfei, 2016. "Foreign Guest Workers or Domestic Workers? Farm Labor Decisions and Implications," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236135, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Schieffer, Jack & Vassalos, Michael, 2015. "Risk and the Use of Contracts by Vegetable Growers," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(3), pages 1-4, August.
    9. Rasul, Golam & Thapa, Gopal B., 2004. "Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: an assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 327-351, March.
    10. Minor, Travis & Perez, Agnes, 2018. "Consumer Demand for Fresh Fruit Drives Increases Across Sector," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 0(03), April.
    11. Michalopoulos, T. & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M. & Heuvelink, E. & Hogeveen, Henk, 2008. "Multi-criteria assessment of ethical aspects in fresh tomato systems: Plant genomics technology innovation and food policy uses," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44147, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Rihn, Alicia & Wei, Xuan & Khachatryan, Hayk, 2019. "Text vs. logo: Does eco-label format influence consumers’ visual attention and willingness-to-pay for fruit plants? An experimental auction approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Omar Ahumada & J. Villalobos, 2011. "A tactical model for planning the production and distribution of fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 339-358, October.
    14. Maria G. Lampridi & Claus G. Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2019. "Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Concepts and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-27, September.
    15. Sandra S. Batie, 1989. "Sustainable Development: Challenges to Profession of Agricultural Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1083-1101.
    16. Sacks, R. & Yi, S.S. & Nonas, C., 2015. "Increasing access to fruits and vegetables: Perspectives from the New York City experience," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(5), pages 29-37.
    17. Nzaku, Kilungu & Houston, Jack E. & Fonsah, Esendugue Greg, 2011. "U.S. Demand for Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Imports," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 42(1), pages 1-5, March.
    18. Low, Sarah A. & Vogel, Stephen J., 2011. "Direct and Intermediated Marketing of Local Foods in the United States," Economic Research Report 118025, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Guenther, Robert, 2017. "The Wonderful World of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2017 260554, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    20. Riccardo Testa & Anna Maria di Trapani & Filippo Sgroi & Salvatore Tudisca, 2014. "Economic Sustainability of Italian Greenhouse Cherry Tomato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    21. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    22. Yuko Onozaka & Dawn Thilmany Mcfadden, 2011. "Does Local Labeling Complement or Compete with Other Sustainable Labels? A Conjoint Analysis of Direct and Joint Values for Fresh Produce Claim," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(3), pages 689-702.
    23. Juan Carlos Pérez-Mesa & Laura Piedra-Muñoz & Mª Carmen García-Barranco & Cynthia Giagnocavo, 2019. "Response of Fresh Food Suppliers to Sustainable Supply Chain Management of Large European Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.
    24. Oakley, Emily, 2014. "Leveraging USDA Programs For Economic Development Through Food Systems," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2014 168656, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Li & Lina He & Guangchuan Yang & Zhen Lian, 2022. "Profit-Sharing Contracts for Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Considering Spatio-Temporal Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davis, Carlton George & Langham, Max R., 1995. "Agricultural Industrialization And Sustainable Development: A Global Perspective," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Printezis, Iryna & Grebitus, Carola, 2018. "Marketing Channels for Local Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 161-171.
    3. Kevin N. Griffith & Lawrence M. Scheier, 2013. "Did We Get Our Money’s Worth? Bridging Economic and Behavioral Measures of Program Success in Adolescent Drug Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
    4. Deaton, Brady J., 1996. "What is Agricultural Economics? A View From University Administration," AAEA Miscellaneous Paper Archive 337283, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Azam khatibi, 2015. "The Effect of University Establishment on Economic, Cultural, and Social Development in Iranian Cities," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(2), pages 97-112, February.
    6. Omar Ahumada & J. Villalobos, 2011. "A tactical model for planning the production and distribution of fresh produce," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 339-358, October.
    7. Davis, Carlton G. & Langham, Max R., 1995. "Agricultural Indistrialization and Sustainable Development: A Global Perspective," International Working Paper Series 237431, University of Florida, Food and Resource Economics Department.
    8. Veldstra, Michael D. & Alexander, Corinne E. & Marshall, Maria I., 2014. "To certify or not to certify? Separating the organic production and certification decisions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P2), pages 429-436.
    9. Forker, Olan D., 1989. "Farm Policy and Income-Enhancement Opportunities," Staff Papers 197591, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    10. Albers, Heidi & Fisher, Anthony & Hanemann, W., 1995. "Valuation and Management of Tropical Forests: Implications of Uncertainty and Irreversibility," CUDARE Working Papers 198641, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    11. Hinson, Roger A. & Sinoha, Ramona & Reaves, Dixie Watts, 2006. "Industry Concentration Impacts on Business Strategies Used by Small Produce Wholesalers," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35291, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    12. Elisa Giampietri & Dieter B. A. Koemle & Xiaohua Yu & Adele Finco, 2016. "Consumers’ Sense of Farmers’ Markets: Tasting Sustainability or Just Purchasing Food?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    13. András István Kun & Marietta Kiss, 2021. "On the Mechanics of the Organic Label Effect: How Does Organic Labeling Change Consumer Evaluation of Food Products?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Konrád Kiss & Csaba Ruszkai & Antónia Szűcs & Gábor Koncz, 2020. "Examining the Role of Local Products in Rural Development in the Light of Consumer Preferences—Results of a Consumer Survey from Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-24, July.
    15. Fox, Glenn, 1990. "The Economics Of The Sustainable Agriculture Movement," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270725, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Ruttan, Vernon W., 1991. "Sustainable Growth In Agricultural Production: Poetry, Policy And Science," Staff Papers 13601, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. Albers, Heidi & Fisher, Anthony & Hanemann, W., 1993. "Valuation and Management of Tropical Forests: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," CUDARE Working Papers 198629, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. Marshall, Graham R. & Fritsch, Simon J. & Dulhunty, Robert V., 2005. "Catalyzing common property farming for rural sustainability: lessons from the Furracabad Valley," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 13.
    19. Reeve, Ian & Kaine, Geoff, 1992. "A Market Approach to Sustainable Land Management," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147253, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Woods, Timothy A. & Saghaian, Sayed H. & Ona, Lucia Y., 2009. "Will Higher Shipping Costs Drive the U.S. to Source More Localized Produce?," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46872, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:5933-:d:561457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.